• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盆腔器官脱垂定量检查D点能否预测子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术的效果?

Does Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination D Point Predict Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Outcomes?

作者信息

Richter Lee A, Park Amy J, Boileau Jenine E, Janni Megan, Desale Sameer, Iglesia Cheryl B

机构信息

From the *National Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, MedStarWashington Hospital Center; †Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, ‡Georgetown University School of Medicine; and §Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 May-Jun;22(3):146-50. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000245.

DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000245
PMID:26829342
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The best predictors for postoperative anatomic apical success after transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension remain unknown. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a correlation between the preoperative D point and anatomic outcomes for apical prolapse after 1 year.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included subjects undergoing transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension from 2008 through 2013 who had at least 1 year follow-up. Demographic information, preoperative and postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) examination measurements, need for retreatment or repeat surgery, and assessment of pelvic floor symptoms were reviewed. Postoperative apical success was defined as C point descent no more than one third into the vaginal canal.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five women met inclusion criteria and had follow-up at 1 year or more. Concomitant procedures included anterior/posterior repair and midurethral sling. Mean follow-up time was 22.8 months (range, 12-63 months). At last follow-up, 96% met criteria for apical success. A more negative preoperative D point was significantly related to improved postoperative apical support, with each 1-cm descent in preoperative D point resulting in a postoperative C point that was 0.21 cm lower (P = 0.0005). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, a "cutoff" D point value of -4.25 (sensitivity, 0.8; specificity, 0.65) was determined to be a predictor of postoperative apical success at 1 year or more.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative D point correlates with postoperative apical support, and a clinically meaningful relationship exists between the preoperative D point and anatomic apical success.

摘要

目的

经阴道子宫骶韧带悬吊术后解剖学上的顶端成功的最佳预测因素仍不明确。本研究的目的是确定术前D点与1年后顶端脱垂的解剖学结局之间是否存在相关性。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2008年至2013年接受经阴道子宫骶韧带悬吊术且至少随访1年的受试者。回顾了人口统计学信息、术前和术后盆底器官脱垂定量(POPQ)检查测量结果、再次治疗或再次手术的需求以及盆底症状评估。术后顶端成功定义为C点下降不超过阴道管的三分之一。

结果

125名女性符合纳入标准并进行了1年或更长时间的随访。同期手术包括前后壁修补和尿道中段吊带术。平均随访时间为22.8个月(范围12 - 63个月)。在最后一次随访时,96%的患者达到顶端成功标准。术前D点越负与术后顶端支持改善显著相关,术前D点每下降1 cm,术后C点降低0.21 cm(P = 0.0005)。根据受试者工作特征曲线,确定“临界”D点值为 -4.25(敏感性0.8;特异性0.65)可作为1年或更长时间术后顶端成功的预测指标。

结论

术前D点与术后顶端支持相关,术前D点与解剖学上的顶端成功之间存在具有临床意义的关系。

相似文献

1
Does Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination D Point Predict Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Outcomes?盆腔器官脱垂定量检查D点能否预测子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术的效果?
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 May-Jun;22(3):146-50. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000245.
2
Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带固定术与经阴道全子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗前位和前顶脱垂:手术结果和患者满意度。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
3
[A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].[对有或无自体组织修复的经阴道高位子宫骶韧带悬吊术治疗中盆腔缺陷效果的五年分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 25;54(7):445-451. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.07.003.
4
[Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].经阴道高位骶子宫韧带悬吊术的长期疗效
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 25;52(6):363-368. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.06.002.
5
Association of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification examination D point with uterosacral ligament suspension outcomes: the "OPTIMAL" D point.盆腔器官脱垂定量检查 D 点与子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术结局的相关性:“OPTIMAL”D 点。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Aug;32(8):2179-2184. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04687-0. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
6
Do Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination Ba and D Guide the Selection of Operation for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse?盆腔器官脱垂定量检查 Ba 和 D 是否指导重度盆腔器官脱垂手术的选择?
J Invest Surg. 2020 Jun;33(5):438-445. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2018.1533055. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
Estimated levator ani subtended volume: a novel assay for predicting surgical failure after uterosacral ligament suspension.预估肛提肌下面积:预测子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术后手术失败的新方法。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;214(5):611.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
8
Concomitant Anterior Repair, Preoperative Prolapse Severity, and Anatomic Prolapse Outcomes After Vaginal Apical Procedures.阴道顶端手术联合前路修复、术前脱垂严重程度及解剖学脱垂结局
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan/Feb;25(1):22-28. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000526.
9
Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.Uterosacral 韧带悬吊术与骶棘韧带固定术联合或不联合围手术期行为疗法治疗盆腔器官阴道脱垂 5 年的手术结果和脱垂症状的影响:OPTIMAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1554-1565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2827.
10
Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.经骶骨固定术或阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术后盆腔器官脱垂复发的危险因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):252.e1-252.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.017. Epub 2022 Apr 16.