• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盆腔器官脱垂定量检查 D 点与子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术结局的相关性:“OPTIMAL”D 点。

Association of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification examination D point with uterosacral ligament suspension outcomes: the "OPTIMAL" D point.

机构信息

MedStar National Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mission Hospital, Asheville, NC, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Aug;32(8):2179-2184. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04687-0. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-021-04687-0
PMID:33710427
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective was to determine the relationship between the preoperative D-point and apical outcomes at 24 months, using the Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss (OPTIMAL) dataset.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of the OPTIMAL trial, a randomized multi-centered study comparing outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation and transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS). The 2-year dataset utilized included women undergoing USLS with concomitant hysterectomy. The primary outcome was the relationship between preoperative D-point and apical outcomes at 24 months. Secondary objectives were to determine the relationship between preoperative D-point and anatomical, composite and subjective outcomes, and to determine a D-point cut-off that could be used to predict success in each of these categories.

RESULTS

Of the 186 women in the USLS arm, 120 were available for analysis of anatomical failure at 24 months. A higher preoperative D-point correlated with improved apical outcome (C-point) at 24 months (r = 0.34; p value = 0.0002). Using ROC curves, a moderate association was found between the preoperative D-point and apical and anatomical success, (AUC 0.689 and 0.662). There was no relationship between preoperative D-point and composite or subjective success (AUC 0.577 and 0.458). Based on the ROC curves, a "cut-off" D-point value of -4.25 cm (sensitivity = 0.58, specificity = 0.67) was determined to be a predictor of postoperative anatomical success at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative D-point correlates with postoperative anatomical and apical support, but is less successful at predicting subjective outcomes. The strongest predictive D-point cut-off for anatomical and apical success at 24 months was -4.25 cm.

摘要

简介与假设

目的是使用 Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss(OPTIMAL)数据集,确定术前 D 点与术后 24 个月时顶点结局之间的关系。

方法

这是 OPTIMAL 试验的二次分析,该试验是一项比较骶棘韧带固定术和经阴道子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术(USLS)结局的随机多中心研究。使用的 2 年数据集包括接受 USLS 联合子宫切除术的女性。主要结局是术前 D 点与术后 24 个月时顶点结局的关系。次要目标是确定术前 D 点与解剖学、综合和主观结局的关系,并确定可用于预测这些类别中每个类别的成功的 D 点截止值。

结果

在 USLS 组的 186 名女性中,有 120 名女性可分析术后 24 个月时的解剖学失败。较高的术前 D 点与术后 24 个月时顶点结局(C 点)改善相关(r=0.34;p 值=0.0002)。使用 ROC 曲线,术前 D 点与顶点和解剖学成功之间存在中度关联(AUC 0.689 和 0.662)。术前 D 点与综合或主观成功之间无相关性(AUC 0.577 和 0.458)。基于 ROC 曲线,术前 D 点值为-4.25cm(敏感性=0.58,特异性=0.67)被确定为术后 2 年时解剖学成功的预测因子。

结论

术前 D 点与术后解剖学和顶点支撑相关,但在预测主观结局方面效果较差。预测术后 24 个月时解剖学和顶点成功的最佳预测 D 点截止值为-4.25cm。

相似文献

1
Association of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification examination D point with uterosacral ligament suspension outcomes: the "OPTIMAL" D point.盆腔器官脱垂定量检查 D 点与子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术结局的相关性:“OPTIMAL”D 点。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Aug;32(8):2179-2184. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04687-0. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
2
Does Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination D Point Predict Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Outcomes?盆腔器官脱垂定量检查D点能否预测子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术的效果?
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 May-Jun;22(3):146-50. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000245.
3
Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带固定术与经阴道全子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗前位和前顶脱垂:手术结果和患者满意度。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
4
Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension.辅助后修补与固有组织顶点悬吊术成功的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;222(2):161.e1-161.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
5
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.骶棘韧带固定术与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗 2 度或以上子宫脱垂的疗效比较:多中心随机试验的随访观察。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.
6
Anterior repair versus no anterior repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse resolved under simulated apical support at the time of uterosacral ligament suspension.经阴道骶骨固定术时模拟顶支持下的前阴道壁膨出的前修补与不修补。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Oct;31(10):2043-2049. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04229-0. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
7
Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.经腹及经阴道联合子宫切除术治疗女性生殖道盆腔脏器脱垂的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Aug;32(8):2021-2031. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04861-4. Epub 2021 May 29.
8
vNOTES versus Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Perioperative and Short-Term Outcomes.vNOTES 与腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的比较:围手术期和短期结局。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Sep;35(9):1899-1908. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05907-z. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
9
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.骶棘韧带子宫固定术与子宫骶骨韧带悬吊的阴道子宫切除术治疗2期及以上子宫脱垂女性的多中心随机非劣效性试验
BMJ. 2015 Jul 23;351:h3717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3717.
10
The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.骶棘韧带子宫固定术及阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶韧带悬吊术对子宫脱垂女性性功能的影响:一项随机对照研究的二次分析
J Sex Med. 2016 Feb;13(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.经阴道手术入路与围手术期行为疗法治疗阴道顶端脱垂的比较:OPTIMAL 随机试验。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1023-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1719.
2
Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis.经阴道子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;202(2):124-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.052.
3
Risk factors for prolapse recurrence after vaginal repair.
阴道修复术后脱垂复发的危险因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;191(5):1533-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.109.