Song Gui Bin, Kim Jwa Jun, Park Eun Cho
Department of Physical Therapy, Yeungnam University College, Republic of Korea.
Department of Physical Therapy, Choonhae College of Health Sciences, Republic of Korea.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Dec;27(12):3879-82. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.3879. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
[Purpose] The purpose of the study was to closely examine the efficiency of Swiss ball exercise and resistance exercise in improving the on the static balancing ability by applying them to patients with scoliosis and to compare the effects of the interventions. [Subjects] Forty scoliosis patients were divided into a Swiss ball exercise group (SEG, N = 20) and a Resistance exercise group (REG, N = 20) randomly. [Methods] SEG conducted chest stretching, trunk exercise using the Swiss ball. REG conducted chest stretching, trunk exercise with therapist's resistance. Both groups received training 30 min per day, five times per week, for eight weeks. [Results] Both SEG and REG showed significant differences between pre- and post-mediation in terms of weight distribution, sway area, sway length, sway speed, and limit of stability. Sway speed and limit of stability had increased more significantly in REG than in SEG. [Conclusion] According to the result of this study, both Swiss ball exercise and chest Resistance exercise were effective for improving on the static balancing ability. But we suggest resistance exercise is more efficient to increase of sway speed, limit of stability.
[目的] 本研究的目的是通过将瑞士球运动和抗阻运动应用于脊柱侧弯患者，来仔细检验它们在改善静态平衡能力方面的效果，并比较这两种干预措施的效果。[对象] 40名脊柱侧弯患者被随机分为瑞士球运动组（SEG，N = 20）和抗阻运动组（REG，N = 20）。[方法] SEG进行胸部伸展、使用瑞士球的躯干运动。REG进行胸部伸展、在治疗师的助力下进行躯干运动。两组均每天训练30分钟，每周训练五次，共训练八周。[结果] SEG和REG在调解前后的体重分布、摆动面积、摆动长度、摆动速度和稳定极限方面均显示出显著差异。REG的摆动速度和稳定极限的增加比SEG更显著。[结论] 根据本研究结果，瑞士球运动和胸部抗阻运动均对改善静态平衡能力有效。但我们建议抗阻运动在提高摆动速度和稳定极限方面更有效。
