Narasimha Deepika, Curtis Anne B
Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, US.
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2015 Aug;4(2):129-35. doi: 10.15420/aer.2015.04.02.129.
Multiple studies have demonstrated that implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) provide significant mortality and morbidity benefits to eligible patients irrespective of gender. However, female patients are less likely to receive this life-saving therapy and are significantly under-represented in cardiac device trials. Various performance improvement programmes have proved that this gender disparity can be reduced and these therapies should be offered to all eligible patients regardless of sex. Efforts should be made to enrol more women in clinical trials and sex-specific analysis in medical device clinical studies should be encouraged. In this article we review the data on sex differences in clinical outcomes with ICDs and CRT and explore the reasons for this sex-based disparity.
多项研究表明,植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)和心脏再同步治疗(CRT)可为符合条件的患者带来显著的死亡率和发病率改善,无论性别如何。然而,女性患者接受这种挽救生命治疗的可能性较小,并且在心脏设备试验中的代表性明显不足。各种性能改进计划已证明,这种性别差异可以减少,这些治疗应提供给所有符合条件的患者,无论性别。应努力让更多女性参与临床试验,并鼓励在医疗器械临床研究中进行性别特异性分析。在本文中,我们回顾了关于ICD和CRT临床结果性别差异的数据,并探讨了这种基于性别的差异的原因。