Chaffee-Cipich Michelle N, Hoss Darby J, Sweat Melissa L, Beaudoin Stephen P
School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, 480 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, 480 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Mar;260:85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.12.041. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
Realistic descriptions of interfacial contact between rough, deformable surfaces under load are difficult to obtain; however, this contact is of great import in a wide range of applications. Here, we detail, through experiment and computational simulation, the interfacial contact between four common traps and five commonly investigated surfaces encountered in explosives detection applications associated with airport security. The Young's modulus and hardness of four traps and seven substrates were measured using nanoindentation. These properties determine how deformation occurs when traps are applied for contact sampling of explosives. The nanoindentation data were analyzed using the Oliver-Pharr method, and an indenter area function was created using silicon and gold as the reference materials. The Young's moduli of the traps ranged from 0.2 to 8 GPa, while those of the surfaces ranged from 0.5 to 4 GPa. The hardness values of the traps ranged from 0.005 to 0.22 GPa, while those of the surfaces ranged from 0.02 to 0.2 GPa. For each of 20 scenarios (4 traps, 5 surfaces), six contact simulations were performed. In these contact simulations, the Greenwood-Willliamson microcontact model was used to represent the behavior of the asperities on the traps, while the Timoshenko Beam model was used to describe the macroscopic behavior of the bulk trap materials spanning the space between asperities. This combination of feature- and trap-scale modeling provides a more realistic description of the interfacial contact than either model applied individually. The calculated distributions of separation distances between the traps and surfaces when the traps were contacted with the surfaces under a normal load were compared to estimate the relative effectiveness of the traps at interrogating the topography of the surfaces. This method is proposed as a tool to guide the development of trap materials for surface sampling and surface cleaning applications.
要获得关于粗糙、可变形表面在负载下界面接触的真实描述并非易事;然而,这种接触在广泛的应用中具有重要意义。在此,我们通过实验和计算模拟,详细研究了与机场安检相关的爆炸物检测应用中常见的四种捕集器与五种常用研究表面之间的界面接触。使用纳米压痕法测量了四种捕集器和七种基底的杨氏模量和硬度。这些特性决定了在使用捕集器对爆炸物进行接触采样时变形是如何发生的。使用奥利弗 - 法尔方法分析纳米压痕数据,并以硅和金作为参考材料创建压头面积函数。捕集器的杨氏模量范围为0.2至8吉帕,而表面的杨氏模量范围为0.5至4吉帕。捕集器的硬度值范围为0.005至0.22吉帕,而表面的硬度值范围为0.02至0.2吉帕。对于20种情况(4种捕集器,5种表面)中的每一种,都进行了六次接触模拟。在这些接触模拟中,格林伍德 - 威廉姆森微接触模型用于表示捕集器上微凸体的行为,而铁木辛柯梁模型用于描述跨越微凸体之间空间的捕集器块状材料的宏观行为。这种特征尺度和捕集器尺度建模的结合比单独应用任何一种模型都能更真实地描述界面接触。比较了在法向载荷下捕集器与表面接触时捕集器和表面之间分离距离的计算分布,以估计捕集器探测表面形貌的相对有效性。该方法被提议作为一种工具,用于指导用于表面采样和表面清洁应用的捕集器材料的开发。