Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 Jul-Aug;20(4):439-47. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1128029. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
EMS personnel often work in unpredictable environments and are at high risk for sustaining occupational injuries. One potential source of injury that is of growing concern is violence toward EMS personnel.
To describe the prevalence of violence directed at EMS personnel by type and source, and to identify characteristics associated with experiencing violence.
The 2013 Longitudinal EMT Attributes and Demographics Study contained 14 items assessing violence experienced in the past 12 months. Violence was categorized by type (physical or verbal) and by source (the patient or a patient's family member or bystander). EMS personnel characteristics included sex, age, race, marital status, certification level, firefighter, volunteerism, agency type, and community size. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed on personnel whose primary role was providing patient care. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to assess associations between provider characteristics and experiencing violence.
A total of 2,515/4,238 (59.3%) responses were received and 1,789 met inclusion criteria. Over two-thirds (69.0%) experienced at least one form of violence in the past 12 months. Verbal violence was more prevalent than physical (67.0% vs. 43.6%). Using multivariable logistic regression to control for other demographic and employment characteristics, paramedics had nearly triple the odds of experiencing physical (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 2.06-3.46) and verbal (OR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.99-3.46) violence as EMTs. Urban personnel had increased odds of experiencing physical (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.21-1.93) and verbal violence (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.02-1.71). Each additional weekly transport increased the odds of experiencing physical (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.03-1.05) and verbal (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.03-1.06) violence by 4%. Those who were volunteers at their main EMS jobs had decreased odds of experiencing physical (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.50-0.92) and verbal (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.44-0.78) violence.
Over two-thirds of EMS personnel experienced at least one form of violence in the last 12 months. Demographic and employment characteristics associated with experiencing violence were identified. Our findings may be used in education initiatives to raise awareness of the high prevalence of violence toward EMS personnel and factors associated with experiencing violence.
EMS 人员经常在不可预测的环境中工作,并且面临职业伤害的高风险。一种越来越令人关注的潜在伤害源是针对 EMS 人员的暴力行为。
描述 EMS 人员遭受暴力的类型和来源的流行程度,并确定与遭受暴力相关的特征。
2013 年 EMT 属性和人口统计学纵向研究包含 14 项评估过去 12 个月内经历过的暴力行为的项目。暴力行为按类型(身体或言语)和来源(患者或患者的家庭成员或旁观者)进行分类。EMS 人员特征包括性别、年龄、种族、婚姻状况、认证级别、消防员、志愿服务、机构类型和社区规模。对主要负责提供患者护理的人员进行描述性和比较分析。多变量逻辑回归模型用于评估提供者特征与经历暴力之间的关联。
共收到 4238 份问卷中的 2515 份(59.3%),其中 1789 份符合纳入标准。超过三分之二(69.0%)的人在过去 12 个月中至少经历过一种形式的暴力。言语暴力比身体暴力更为普遍(67.0%比 43.6%)。使用多变量逻辑回归来控制其他人口统计学和就业特征,护理人员经历身体暴力(OR = 2.67,95% CI = 2.06-3.46)和言语暴力(OR = 2.63,95% CI = 1.99-3.46)的可能性几乎是 EMT 的三倍。城市人员经历身体暴力(OR = 1.53,95% CI = 1.21-1.93)和言语暴力(OR = 1.32,95% CI = 1.02-1.71)的可能性增加。每周每增加一次转运,经历身体暴力(OR = 1.04,95% CI = 1.03-1.05)和言语暴力(OR = 1.04,95% CI = 1.03-1.06)的几率分别增加 4%。在主要 EMS 工作中担任志愿者的人员经历身体暴力(OR = 0.68,95% CI = 0.50-0.92)和言语暴力(OR = 0.59,95% CI = 0.44-0.78)的几率降低。
超过三分之二的 EMS 人员在过去 12 个月中至少经历过一种形式的暴力。确定了与经历暴力相关的人口统计学和就业特征。我们的研究结果可用于教育计划,以提高对 EMS 人员遭受暴力的高流行率以及与经历暴力相关的因素的认识。