Belcaro G, Vasdekis S, Rulo A, Nicolaides A N
Irvine Laboratory for Cardiovascular Investigation and Research, St. Mary's Hospital Medical School, London, England.
Angiology. 1989 Nov;40(11):953-7. doi: 10.1177/000331978904001103.
Skin blood flow in the distal foot was evaluated in patients with peripheral vascular disease and diabetes and compared with skin blood flow in normal volunteers by use of laser Doppler flowmetry. Resting blood flow (RBF) and standing blood flow (SBF) were recorded in a room at a constant temperature (20-22 degrees C). The RBF was found to be different in the five groups (normal, diabetics, patients with intermittent claudication, those with rest pain and those with impending gangrene. In diabetics RBF was significantly higher than in normal subjects. Even on standing, SBF in diabetics was higher and not different from RBF, indicating an ineffective venoarteriolar response (VAR). The VAR was also reduced in patients with claudication and was abolished in patients with rest pain and impending gangrene. In patients with rest pain SBF was increased. Laser Doppler flowmetry is a useful technique for evaluating skin perfusion in patients with peripheral arterial disease and for discriminating among different classes of patients.
通过激光多普勒血流仪对周围血管疾病和糖尿病患者足部远端的皮肤血流进行评估,并与正常志愿者的皮肤血流进行比较。在恒温(20 - 22摄氏度)的房间内记录静息血流(RBF)和站立血流(SBF)。发现五组(正常组、糖尿病组、间歇性跛行患者组、静息痛患者组和即将发生坏疽患者组)的RBF存在差异。糖尿病患者的RBF显著高于正常受试者。即使在站立时,糖尿病患者的SBF也较高,且与RBF无差异,表明静脉小动脉反应(VAR)无效。间歇性跛行患者的VAR也降低,而静息痛和即将发生坏疽的患者VAR消失。静息痛患者的SBF增加。激光多普勒血流仪是评估外周动脉疾病患者皮肤灌注以及区分不同类型患者的有用技术。