Suppr超能文献

伊伐布雷定用于伴或不伴左心室功能障碍的稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的荟萃分析

Meta-analysis of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease With and Without Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

作者信息

Cammarano Carolyn, Silva Matthew, Comee Morgan, Donovan Jennifer L, Malloy Michael J

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, MCPHS University, Worcester, Massachusetts.

Department of Pharmacy Practice, MCPHS University, Worcester, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2016 Feb;38(2):387-95. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.12.018. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Ivabradine is a novel If-channel antagonist that controls heart rate and may be helpful in treating patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) who are unable to tolerate β-blockers or achieve a heart rate of 70 beats/min with standard therapy. Three landmark trials were used for the approval of ivabradine in the United States. These trials tested ivabradine in addition to a standard of care (including β-blockers) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and found modest benefit in those with established LVD unable to tolerate β-blockers. The goal of this review was to pool data from ivabradine studies in all patients with stable CAD to compare cardiovascular and safety-related outcomes.

METHODS

Three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of ivabradine added to standard treatment (including β-blockers) in patients with stable CAD with and without LVD were reviewed for effects on mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, and adverse events. Data were independently abstracted by 2 reviewers; the Oxford quality scoring system was used to evaluate randomization, blinding, withdrawals, and dropouts; and a Mantel-Haenszel random effects pairwise meta-analysis was used to combine data into odds ratios.

FINDINGS

The initial search identified 116 trials; 3 of these trials, representing 36,524 patients with stable CAD, met inclusion criteria. According to the pooled results, ivabradine did not consistently reduce all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.91-1.11]; P = 0.98], cardiovascular death (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.91-1.15]; P = 0.74), or hospitalization for worsening or new onset heart-failure in patients with stable CAD (OR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.71-1.25]; P = 0.69). Ivabradine did not increase serious adverse drug reactions (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.88-1.13]; P = 0.93) or cardiac disorders (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.87-1.22]; P = 0.74). However, it was associated with drug-specific effects, including new-onset atrial fibrillation (OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.19-1.53]; P < 0.001], bradycardia (OR, 6.54 [95% CI, 3.30-12.9]; P < 0.001), phosphenes (OR, 7.77 [95% CI, 4.12-14.63]; P < 0.001), and blurry vision (OR, 3.07 [95% CI, 2.18-4.32]; P < 0.001).

IMPLICATIONS

Unselective use of ivabradine in patients with stable CAD is not supported by evidence and can be associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, and drug-related nuisance adverse events.

摘要

目的

伊伐布雷定是一种新型的If通道拮抗剂,可控制心率,可能有助于治疗无法耐受β受体阻滞剂或采用标准治疗后心率仍无法达到70次/分钟的左心室功能不全(LVD)患者。在美国,三项具有里程碑意义的试验被用于批准伊伐布雷定。这些试验在稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中,除了采用包括β受体阻滞剂在内的标准治疗外,还对伊伐布雷定进行了测试,结果发现它对那些已确诊LVD且无法耐受β受体阻滞剂的患者有一定益处。本综述的目的是汇总伊伐布雷定在所有稳定型CAD患者研究中的数据,以比较心血管和安全性相关结局。

方法

回顾了三项在有或无LVD的稳定型CAD患者中,将伊伐布雷定添加到标准治疗(包括β受体阻滞剂)中的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,以评估其对死亡率、心血管结局和不良事件的影响。数据由两名审阅者独立提取;采用牛津质量评分系统评估随机化、盲法、撤药和失访情况;并使用Mantel-Haenszel随机效应成对荟萃分析将数据合并为比值比。

结果

初步检索识别出116项试验;其中3项试验,代表36524例稳定型CAD患者,符合纳入标准。根据汇总结果,伊伐布雷定并不能持续降低全因死亡率(比值比[OR],1.00[95%置信区间,0.91-1.11];P = 0.98)、心血管死亡(OR,1.02[95%置信区间,0.91-1.15];P = 0.74),或稳定型CAD患者因心力衰竭恶化或新发而住院的情况(OR,0.94[95%置信区间,0.71-1.25];P = 0.69)。伊伐布雷定并未增加严重药物不良反应(OR,0.99[95%置信区间,0.88-1.13];P = 0.93)或心脏疾病(OR,1.03[95%置信区间,0.87-1.22];P = 0.74)。然而,它与特定药物效应相关,包括新发房颤(OR,1.35[95%置信区间,1.19-1.53];P < 0.001)、心动过缓(OR,6.54[95%置信区间,3.30-12.9];P < 0.001)、光幻视(OR,7.77[95%置信区间,4.12-14.63];P < 0.001)和视物模糊(OR,3.07[95%置信区间,2.18-4.32];P < 0.001)。

结论

在稳定型CAD患者中无差别地使用伊伐布雷定缺乏证据支持,且可能与新发房颤、心动过缓及药物相关的烦扰性不良事件有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验