Van Dillen Lotte F, Enter Dorien, Peters Leonie P M, van Dijk Wilco W, Rotteveel Mark
Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Leiden University, The Netherlands; Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Biol Psychol. 2017 Jan;122:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
People derive their sense of belonging from perceptions of being a moral person. Research moreover suggests that social cues of rejection rapidly influence visual scanning, and result in avoidant gaze behavior, especially in socially anxious individuals. With the current eye-tracking experiment, we therefore examined whether moral integrity threats and affirmations influence selective avoidance of social threat, and how this varies with individual differences in social anxiety. Fifty-nine participants retrieved a memory of a past immoral, moral, or neutral act. Next, participants passively viewed angry, happy, and neutral faces, while we recorded how often they first fixated on the eyes. In addition, we administered the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (1987). Participants first fixated less on angry eyes compared to happy or neutral eyes when their moral integrity was threatened, and this selective avoidance was enhanced with increasing social anxiety. Following a moral affirmation, however, participants no longer selectively avoided the eyes of angry faces, regardless of individual differences in social anxiety. The results thus suggest that both low and high socially anxious people adjust their social gaze behavior in response to threats and affirmations of their moral integrity, pointing to the importance of the social context when considering affective processing biases.
人们从对自身是一个有道德的人的认知中获得归属感。此外,研究表明,被排斥的社会线索会迅速影响视觉扫描,并导致回避性注视行为,尤其是在社交焦虑的个体中。因此,通过当前的眼动追踪实验,我们研究了道德完整性威胁和肯定是否会影响对社会威胁的选择性回避,以及这如何因社交焦虑的个体差异而有所不同。59名参与者回忆了过去不道德、道德或中性行为的记忆。接下来,参与者被动地观看愤怒、高兴和中性的面孔,同时我们记录他们首次注视眼睛的频率。此外,我们使用了利博维茨社交焦虑量表(1987年)。当道德完整性受到威胁时,与高兴或中性的眼睛相比,参与者首次注视愤怒眼睛的次数减少,并且这种选择性回避随着社交焦虑的增加而增强。然而,在进行道德肯定之后,无论社交焦虑的个体差异如何,参与者不再选择性地回避愤怒面孔的眼睛。因此,结果表明,社交焦虑程度低和高的人都会根据对其道德完整性的威胁和肯定来调整他们的社交注视行为,这表明在考虑情感加工偏差时社会背景的重要性。