Eikenberg Joshua D, Savla Jyoti, Marinik Elaina L, Davy Kevin P, Pownall John, Baugh Mary E, Flack Kyle D, Boshra Soheir, Winett Richard A, Davy Brenda M
Department of Internal Medicine, Carilion Clinic-Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, United States of America.
Center for Gerontology & Department of Human Development, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 3;11(2):e0148009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148009. eCollection 2016.
To determine if prediabetes phenotype influences improvements in glucose homeostasis with resistance training (RT).
Older, overweight individuals with prediabetes (n = 159; aged 60±5 yrs; BMI 33±4 kg/m2) completed a supervised RT program twice per week for 12 weeks. Body weight and composition, strength, fasting plasma glucose, 2-hr oral glucose tolerance, and Matsuda-Defronza estimated insulin sensitivity index (ISI) were assessed before and after the intervention. Participants were categorized according to their baseline prediabetes phenotype as impaired fasting glucose only (IFG) (n = 73), impaired glucose tolerance only (IGT) (n = 21), or combined IFG and IGT (IFG/IGT) (n = 65).
Chest press and leg press strength increased 27% and 18%, respectively, following the 12-week RT program (both p<0.05). Waist circumference (-1.0%; pre 109.3±10.3 cm, post 108.2±10.6 cm) and body fat (-0.6%; pre 43.7±6.8%, post 43.1±6.8%) declined, and lean body mass (+1.3%; pre 52.0±10.4 kg, post 52.7±10.7 kg) increased following the intervention. Fasting glucose concentrations did not change (p>0.05) following the intervention. However, 2-hr oral glucose tolerance improved in those with IGT (pre 8.94±0.72 mmol/l, post 7.83±1.11 mmol/l, p<0.05) and IFG/IGT (pre 9.66±1.11mmol/l, post 8.60±2.00 mmol/l) but not in those with IFG (pre 6.27±1.28mmol/l, post 6.33± 1.55 mmol/l). There were no significant changes in ISI or glucose area under the curve following the RT program.
RT without dietary intervention improves 2-hr oral glucose tolerance in individuals with prediabetes. However, the improvements in glucose homeostasis with RT appear limited to those with IGT or combined IFG and IGT.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01112709.
确定糖尿病前期表型是否会影响抗阻训练(RT)对葡萄糖稳态的改善作用。
159名患有糖尿病前期的老年超重个体(年龄60±5岁;体重指数33±4kg/m²),每周进行两次有监督的RT计划,共12周。在干预前后评估体重和身体成分、力量、空腹血糖、2小时口服葡萄糖耐量以及松田-德弗龙扎估计胰岛素敏感性指数(ISI)。参与者根据其基线糖尿病前期表型分为仅空腹血糖受损(IFG)(n = 73)、仅葡萄糖耐量受损(IGT)(n = 21)或IFG与IGT合并(IFG/IGT)(n = 65)。
经过12周的RT计划后,卧推和腿举力量分别增加了27%和18%(均p<0.05)。干预后腰围(-1.0%;干预前109.3±10.3cm,干预后108.2±10.6cm)和体脂(-0.6%;干预前43.7±6.8%,干预后43.1±6.8%)下降,瘦体重增加(+1.3%;干预前52.0±10.4kg,干预后52.7±10.7kg)。干预后空腹血糖浓度未发生变化(p>0.05)。然而,IGT患者(干预前8.94±0.72mmol/l,干预后7.83±1.11mmol/l,p<0.05)和IFG/IGT患者(干预前9.66±1.11mmol/l,干预后8.60±2.00mmol/l)的2小时口服葡萄糖耐量有所改善,而IFG患者(干预前6.27±1.28mmol/l,干预后6.33±1.55mmol/l)则没有。RT计划后ISI或曲线下葡萄糖面积没有显著变化。
未经饮食干预的RT可改善糖尿病前期个体的2小时口服葡萄糖耐量。然而,RT对葡萄糖稳态的改善似乎仅限于IGT患者或IFG与IGT合并的患者。
ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01112709。