Van Haute Tom, De Poorter Eli, Crombez Pieter, Lemic Filip, Handziski Vlado, Wirström Niklas, Wolisz Adam, Voigt Thiemo, Moerman Ingrid
INTEC Department, IBCN, Ghent University, Gaston Crommenlaan 8, 9050, Ghent, Belgium.
Televic NV, Leo Bekaertlaan 1, 8870, Izegem, Belgium.
Int J Health Geogr. 2016 Feb 3;15:7. doi: 10.1186/s12942-016-0034-z.
The combination of an aging population and nursing staff shortages implies the need for more advanced systems in the healthcare industry. Many key enablers for the optimization of healthcare systems require provisioning of location awareness for patients (e.g. with dementia), nurses, doctors, assets, etc. Therefore, many Indoor Positioning Systems (IPSs) will be indispensable in healthcare systems. However, although many IPSs have been proposed in literature, most of these have been evaluated in non-representative environments such as office buildings rather than in a hospital.
To remedy this, the paper evaluates the performance of existing IPSs in an operational modern healthcare environment: the "Sint-Jozefs kliniek Izegem" hospital in Belgium. The evaluation (data-collecting and data-processing) is executed using a standardized methodology and evaluates the point accuracy, room accuracy and latency of multiple IPSs. To evaluate the solutions, the position of a stationary device was requested at 73 evaluation locations. By using the same evaluation locations for all IPSs the performance of all systems could objectively be compared.
Several trends can be identified such as the fact that Wi-Fi based fingerprinting solutions have the best accuracy result (point accuracy of 1.21 m and room accuracy of 98%) however it requires calibration before use and needs 5.43 s to estimate the location. On the other hand, proximity based solutions (based on sensor nodes) are significantly cheaper to install, do not require calibration and still obtain acceptable room accuracy results.
As a conclusion of this paper, Wi-Fi based solutions have the most potential for an indoor positioning service in case when accuracy is the most important metric. Applying the fingerprinting approach with an anchor installed in every two rooms is the preferred solution for a hospital environment.
人口老龄化与护理人员短缺的双重因素意味着医疗行业需要更先进的系统。优化医疗系统的许多关键推动因素都需要为患者(如患有痴呆症的患者)、护士、医生、资产等提供位置感知。因此,许多室内定位系统(IPS)在医疗系统中将不可或缺。然而,尽管文献中已经提出了许多IPS,但其中大多数是在办公楼等非典型环境中进行评估的,而非在医院环境中。
为了弥补这一不足,本文在一个实际运营的现代医疗环境中评估了现有IPS的性能:比利时的“圣约瑟夫斯克林尼克伊泽海姆”医院。评估(数据收集和数据处理)采用标准化方法进行,评估了多个IPS的点精度、房间精度和延迟。为了评估这些解决方案,在73个评估位置请求了一个固定设备的位置。通过对所有IPS使用相同的评估位置,可以客观地比较所有系统的性能。
可以确定几个趋势,例如基于Wi-Fi的指纹识别解决方案具有最佳的精度结果(点精度为1.21米,房间精度为98%),但使用前需要校准,估计位置需要5.43秒。另一方面,基于接近度的解决方案(基于传感器节点)安装成本显著更低,不需要校准,并且仍然能够获得可接受的房间精度结果。
作为本文的结论,在精度是最重要指标的情况下,基于Wi-Fi的解决方案在室内定位服务方面具有最大潜力。在医院环境中,每两个房间安装一个锚点的指纹识别方法是首选解决方案。