Hanna Tarek N, Shekhani Haris, Zygmont Matthew E, Kerchberger James Matthew, Johnson Jamlik-Omari
Division of Emergency Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 550 Peachtree Road, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA.
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emerg Radiol. 2016 Apr;23(2):169-74. doi: 10.1007/s10140-016-1378-1. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of incidental findings (IFs) in emergency department (ED) imaging reports and evaluate the adherence of imaging recommendations to consensus societal guidelines for IFs. A retrospective review of consecutive ED computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) reports from two university-affiliated EDs over a 2-month period was performed. Each imaging report was reviewed in its entirety, and incidental findings were documented along with recommendations for additional imaging. Imaging recommendations were compared to published societal guidelines from the American College of Radiology (ACR) and Fleischner Society. Three thousand one hundred thirty-one total cases consisting of 1967 CTs and 1164 US contained 514 incidental findings (16.4 %), with 329 CT IFs (64 %) and 185 US IFs (36 %). The ovary was the most common organ for an IF (n = 214, 42 %). Of all IFs, 347 (67.5 %) recommendations were concordant with societal guidelines and 167 (32.5 %) were discordant. 39.8 % of CT recommendations were discordant, while 19.5 % of US recommendations were discordant (p < 0.0001). Incidental findings are commonly encountered in the emergent setting. Variable adherence to societal guidelines is noted. Targeted radiologist education and technological solutions may decrease rates of discordance.
本研究的目的是评估急诊科(ED)影像报告中偶然发现(IFs)的频率,并评估影像建议对IFs社会共识指南的遵循情况。对两所大学附属医院急诊科连续2个月的计算机断层扫描(CT)和超声检查(US)报告进行了回顾性分析。对每份影像报告进行了全面审查,记录了偶然发现以及额外影像检查的建议。将影像建议与美国放射学会(ACR)和弗莱施纳学会发布的社会指南进行了比较。总共3131例病例,包括1967例CT和1164例US,包含514个偶然发现(16.4%),其中329个CT偶然发现(64%),185个US偶然发现(36%)。卵巢是偶然发现最常见的器官(n = 214,42%)。在所有偶然发现中,347条(67.5%)建议与社会指南一致,167条(32.5%)不一致。CT建议中有39.8%不一致,而US建议中有19.5%不一致(p < 0.0001)。偶然发现在急诊环境中很常见。注意到对社会指南的遵循情况存在差异。有针对性的放射科医生教育和技术解决方案可能会降低不一致率。