Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Aug;19(8):1379-1389. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1220OC.
Millions of people are diagnosed with incidental pulmonary nodules every year. Although most nodules are benign, it is universally recommended that all patients be assessed to determine appropriate follow-up and ensure that it is obtained. To determine the degree of concordance and adherence to 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines among radiologists, clinicians, and patients at two Veterans Affairs healthcare systems with incidental nodule tracking systems. Trained researchers abstracted data from the electronic health records of patients with incidental pulmonary nodules as identified by interpreting radiologists from 2008 to 2016. We classified radiology reports and patient follow-up into three categories. Radiologist-Fleischner adherence was the agreement between the radiologist's recommendation in the computed tomography (CT) report and the 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines. Clinician/patient-Fleischner concordance was agreement between patient follow-up and the guidelines. Clinician/patient-radiologist adherence was agreement between the radiologist's recommendation and patient follow-up. We evaluated whether the recommendation or follow-up was more (e.g., sooner) or less (e.g., later) aggressive than recommended. After exclusions, 4,586 patients with 7,408 imaging tests ( = 4,586 initial chest CT scans; = 2,717 follow-up chest CT scans; = 105 follow-up low-dose CT scans) were included. Among radiology reports that could be classified in terms of Fleischner Society guidelines ( = 3,150), 80% had nonmissing radiologist recommendations. Among those reports, radiologist-Fleischner adherence was 86.6%, with 4.8% more aggressive and 8.6% less aggressive. Among patients whose initial scans could be classified, clinician/patient-Fleischner concordance was 46.0%, 14.5% were more aggressive, and 39.5% were less aggressive. Clinician/patient-radiologist adherence was 54.3%. Veterans whose radiology reports were adherent to Fleischner Society guidelines had a substantially higher proportion of clinician/patient-Fleischner concordance: 52.0% concordance among radiologist-Fleischner adherent versus 11.6% concordance among radiologist-Fleischner nonadherent. In this multi-health system observational study of incidental pulmonary nodule follow-up, we found that radiologist adherence to 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines may be necessary but not sufficient. Our results highlight the many facets of care processes that must occur to achieve guideline-concordant care.
每年都有数百万人被诊断出患有偶然发现的肺结节。尽管大多数结节是良性的,但普遍建议所有患者都进行评估,以确定适当的随访,并确保获得随访。本研究旨在确定在两个退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中,偶然结节跟踪系统中,放射科医生、临床医生和患者之间对 2005 年 Fleischner 学会指南的一致性和遵循程度。研究人员从 2008 年至 2016 年放射科医生解读的偶然肺结节患者的电子健康记录中提取数据。我们将放射学报告和患者随访分为三类。放射科医生-Fleischner 一致性是放射科医生在 CT 报告中的建议与 2005 年 Fleischner 学会指南之间的一致性。临床医生/患者-Fleischner 一致性是患者随访与指南的一致性。临床医生/患者-放射科医生一致性是放射科医生的建议与患者随访之间的一致性。我们评估了建议或随访是否比推荐的更(例如更早)或更不(例如更晚)激进。排除后,4586 名患者进行了 7408 次影像学检查( = 4586 例初始胸部 CT 扫描; = 2717 例随访胸部 CT 扫描; = 105 例随访低剂量 CT 扫描)。在可以根据 Fleischner 学会指南进行分类的放射学报告中( = 3150),80%的报告有非缺失的放射科医生建议。在这些报告中,放射科医生-Fleischner 一致性为 86.6%,其中 4.8%更激进,8.6%不那么激进。在可以对初始扫描进行分类的患者中,临床医生/患者-Fleischner 一致性为 46.0%,14.5%更激进,39.5%不那么激进。临床医生/患者-放射科医生一致性为 54.3%。放射学报告符合 Fleischner 学会指南的退伍军人患者,其临床医生/患者-Fleischner 一致性比例显著更高:放射科医生-Fleischner 一致性患者中 52.0%的一致性,而放射科医生-Fleischner 非一致性患者中 11.6%的一致性。在这项关于偶然肺结节随访的多医疗系统观察性研究中,我们发现放射科医生对 2005 年 Fleischner 学会指南的遵循可能是必要的,但不是充分的。我们的研究结果突出了实现指南一致的护理过程中必须发生的许多方面。