Aristi I, Casellas M, Elosegi A, Insa S, Petrovic M, Sabater S, Acuña V
Faculty of Science and Technology, The University of the Basque Country, PO Box 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain.
Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA), Carrer Emili Grahit 101, 17003 Girona, Spain.
Environ Pollut. 2016 May;212:208-215. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.067. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
Freshwater ecosystems are threatened by multiple anthropogenic stressors, which might be differentiated into two types: those that reduce biological activity at all concentrations (toxic contaminants), and those that subsidize biological activity at low concentrations and reduce it at high concentrations (assimilable contaminants). When occurring in mixtures, these contaminants can have either antagonistic, neutral or synergistic effects; but little is known on their joint effects. We assessed the interaction effects of a mixture of assimilable and toxic contaminants on stream biofilms in a manipulative experiment using artificial streams, and following a factorial design with three nutrient levels (low, medium or high) and either presence or absence of a mixture of emerging contaminants (ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, diclofenac, methylparaben, and sulfamethoxazole). We measured biofilm biomass, basal fluorescence, gross primary production and community respiration. Our initial hypotheses were that biofilm biomass and activity would: increase with medium nutrient concentrations (subsidy effect), but decrease with high nutrient concentrations (stress effect) (i); decrease with emerging contaminants, with the minimum decrease at medium nutrient concentrations (antagonistic interaction between nutrients subsidy and stress by emerging contaminants) and the maximum decrease at high nutrient concentrations (synergistic interaction between nutrients and emerging contaminants stress) (ii). All the measured variables responded linearly to the available nutrients, with no toxic effect at high nutrient concentrations. Emerging contaminants only caused weak toxic effects in some of the measured variables, and only after 3-4 weeks of exposure. Therefore, only antagonistic interactions were observed between nutrients and emerging contaminants, as medium and high nutrient concentrations partly compensated the harmful effects of emerging contaminants during the first weeks of the experiment. Our results show that contaminants with a subsidy effect can alleviate the effects of toxic contaminants, and that long-term experiments are required to detect stress effects of emerging contaminants at environmentally relevant concentrations.
淡水生态系统受到多种人为压力源的威胁,这些压力源可分为两类:一类是在所有浓度下都会降低生物活性的(有毒污染物),另一类是在低浓度下促进生物活性而在高浓度下降低生物活性的(可同化污染物)。当这些污染物混合存在时,它们可能产生拮抗、中性或协同效应;但对于它们的联合效应我们知之甚少。我们在一项使用人工溪流的操纵性实验中,采用三因素设计,设置三个营养水平(低、中、高)以及是否存在新兴污染物混合物(环丙沙星、红霉素、双氯芬酸、对羟基苯甲酸甲酯和磺胺甲恶唑),评估了可同化污染物和有毒污染物混合物对溪流生物膜的相互作用影响。我们测量了生物膜生物量、基础荧光、总初级生产力和群落呼吸。我们最初的假设是生物膜生物量和活性将会:随着中等营养浓度增加(补贴效应),但随着高营养浓度降低(胁迫效应)(i);随着新兴污染物减少,在中等营养浓度下减少量最小(营养补贴与新兴污染物胁迫之间的拮抗相互作用),在高营养浓度下减少量最大(营养与新兴污染物胁迫之间的协同相互作用)(ii)。所有测量变量对可利用营养呈线性响应,在高营养浓度下没有毒性效应。新兴污染物仅在一些测量变量中产生微弱的毒性效应,且仅在暴露3 - 4周后才出现。因此,在实验的最初几周,仅观察到营养与新兴污染物之间的拮抗相互作用,因为中等和高营养浓度部分抵消了新兴污染物的有害影响。我们的结果表明,具有补贴效应的污染物可以减轻有毒污染物的影响,并且需要长期实验来检测环境相关浓度下新兴污染物的胁迫效应。