Gaither Julie R, Goulet Joseph L, Becker William C, Crystal Stephen, Edelman E Jennifer, Gordon Kirsha, Kerns Robert D, Rimland David, Skanderson Melissa, Justice Amy C, Fiellin David A
Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Avenue, West Haven, CT, 06516, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 May;31(5):492-501. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3571-4.
For patients receiving long-term opioid therapy (LtOT), the impact of guideline-concordant care on important clinical outcomes--notably mortality--is largely unknown, even among patients with a high comorbidity and mortality burden (e.g., HIV-infected patients). Our objective was to determine the association between receipt of guideline-concordant LtOT and 1-year all-cause mortality.
Among HIV-infected and uninfected patients initiating LtOT between 2000 and 2010 through the Department of Veterans Affairs, we used Cox regression with time-updated covariates and propensity-score matched analyses to examine the association between receipt of guideline-concordant care and 1-year all-cause mortality.
Of 17,044 patients initiating LtOT between 2000 and 2010, 1048 patients (6%) died during 1 year of follow-up. Patients receiving psychotherapeutic co-interventions (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.75; P < 0.001) or physical rehabilitative therapies (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.67-0.98; P = 0.03) had a decreased risk of all-cause mortality compared to patients not receiving these services, whereas patients prescribed benzodiazepines concurrent with opioids had a higher risk of mortality (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.12-1.66; P < 0.001). Among patients with a current substance use disorder (SUD), those receiving SUD treatment had a lower risk of mortality than untreated patients (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.32-0.68; P = < 0.001). No association was found between all-cause mortality and primary care visits (HR 1.12; 95% CI 0.90-1.26; P = 0.32) or urine drug testing (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.78-1.17; P = 0.67).
Providers should use caution in initiating LtOT in conjunction with benzodiazepines and untreated SUDs. Patients receiving LtOT may benefit from multi-modal treatment that addresses chronic pain and its associated comorbidities across multiple disciplines.
对于接受长期阿片类药物治疗(LtOT)的患者,符合指南的治疗对重要临床结局(尤其是死亡率)的影响在很大程度上尚不清楚,即使在合并症和死亡负担较高的患者(如感染HIV的患者)中也是如此。我们的目标是确定接受符合指南的LtOT与1年全因死亡率之间的关联。
在2000年至2010年期间通过退伍军人事务部开始接受LtOT的感染HIV和未感染HIV的患者中,我们使用带时间更新协变量的Cox回归和倾向评分匹配分析来检验接受符合指南的治疗与1年全因死亡率之间的关联。
在2000年至2010年开始接受LtOT的17044例患者中,1048例患者(6%)在1年随访期间死亡。与未接受这些服务的患者相比,接受心理治疗联合干预(风险比[HR]0.62;95%置信区间[CI]0.51 - 0.75;P < 0.001)或物理康复治疗(HR 0.81;95% CI 0.67 - 0.98;P = 0.03)的患者全因死亡风险降低,而同时开具苯二氮䓬类药物和阿片类药物的患者死亡风险更高(HR 1.39;95% CI 1.12 - 1.66;P < 0.001)。在当前患有物质使用障碍(SUD)的患者中,接受SUD治疗的患者比未治疗的患者死亡风险更低(HR 0.47;95% CI 0.32 - 0.68;P = < 0.001)。未发现全因死亡率与初级保健就诊(HR 1.12;95% CI 0.90 - 1.26;P = 0.32)或尿液药物检测(HR 0.96;95% CI 0.78 - 1.17;P = 0.67)之间存在关联。
医疗服务提供者在开始LtOT时应谨慎联合使用苯二氮䓬类药物和未治疗的SUD。接受LtOT的患者可能受益于跨多学科解决慢性疼痛及其相关合并症的多模式治疗。