• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外部质量控制实验室干预后宫颈细胞病理学的可重复性

Reproducibility of cervical cytopathology following an intervention by an external quality control laboratory.

作者信息

Ázara Cinara Zago Silveira, Manrique Edna Joana Claudio, Tavares Suelene Brito do Nascimento, Alves de Souza Nadja Lindany, Magalhães Juliana Cristina, Amaral Rita Goreti

机构信息

External Quality Control Laboratory, School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.

Department of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.

出版信息

Diagn Cytopathol. 2016 Apr;44(4):305-10. doi: 10.1002/dc.23445. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1002/dc.23445
PMID:26848707
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the effects of a continued education program on the agreement between cervical cytopathology exams interpreted by local laboratories and interpretation made by an external quality control laboratory (LabMEQ).

METHODS

Overall, 9,798 exams were analyzed between 2007 and 2008, prior to implementation of a continued education program, and 10,028 between 2010 and 2011, following implementation. Continued education consisted of theoretical and practical classes held every two months. The chi-square test and the kappa coefficient were used in the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Following implementation of continued education, the rate of false-negative results, and those leading to delays in clinical management fell in eight laboratories and the rate of false-positive results in five. Agreement between the results reported by the laboratories and the findings of LabMEQ, evaluated according to clinical management, remained excellent in three laboratories (kappa >0.80 and <1.0), went from good (kappa >0.60 and <0.80) to excellent in seven and from excellent to good in two. Agreement regarding the identification of metaplastic epithelium was poor (kappa = 0.25) but progressed to excellent following the implementation of continued education (kappa = 0.950). Agreement between cytopathology results improved significantly following implementation of continued education in cases reported as unsatisfactory (P < 0.001), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (P < 0.001), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (P < 0.001), and glandular atypia (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Continued education contributed towards improving the reproducibility of cervical cytopathology, decreased the rates of false-negative and false-positive results, and reduced delays in clinical management.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了一项继续教育项目对当地实验室解读的宫颈细胞病理学检查结果与外部质量控制实验室(LabMEQ)解读结果之间一致性的影响。

方法

总体而言,在2007年至2008年实施继续教育项目之前分析了9798份检查,在2010年至2011年实施之后分析了10028份。继续教育包括每两个月举办的理论和实践课程。统计分析采用卡方检验和kappa系数。

结果

实施继续教育后,八个实验室的假阴性结果率以及导致临床管理延迟的结果率下降,五个实验室的假阳性结果率下降。根据临床管理评估,实验室报告的结果与LabMEQ的结果之间的一致性在三个实验室中仍然极佳(kappa>0.80且<1.0),在七个实验室中从良好(kappa>0.60且<0.80)提升至极佳,在两个实验室中从极佳降至良好。关于化生上皮识别的一致性较差(kappa = 0.25),但在实施继续教育后提升至极佳(kappa = 0.950)。在报告为不满意(P < 0.001)、意义不明确的非典型鳞状细胞、不能排除高级别鳞状上皮内病变(P < 0.001)、低级别鳞状上皮内病变(P < 0.001)和腺上皮异型性(P < 0.001)的病例中,实施继续教育后细胞病理学结果之间的一致性显著改善。

结论

继续教育有助于提高宫颈细胞病理学的可重复性,降低假阴性和假阳性结果率,并减少临床管理中的延迟。

相似文献

1
Reproducibility of cervical cytopathology following an intervention by an external quality control laboratory.外部质量控制实验室干预后宫颈细胞病理学的可重复性
Diagn Cytopathol. 2016 Apr;44(4):305-10. doi: 10.1002/dc.23445. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
2
Impact of Implementing 100% Rapid Review as a Quality Control Tool in Cervical Cytology.将100%快速审核作为宫颈细胞学质量控制工具的影响
Acta Cytol. 2018;62(2):115-120. doi: 10.1159/000487426. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
3
Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.p16免疫组化在评估高危巴氏试验结果后宫颈活检阴性中的应用
Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 Jan;42(1):69-75. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000960.
4
Internal quality control indicators of cervical cytopathology exams performed in laboratories monitored by the External Quality Control Laboratory.由外部质量控制实验室监测的实验室所进行的宫颈细胞病理学检查的内部质量控制指标。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;36(9):398-403. doi: 10.1590/so100-720320140004996.
5
Performance of Laboratories after 10 Years of Participating in External Quality Monitoring in Cervical Cytology.参与宫颈细胞学外部质量监测10年后各实验室的表现
Acta Cytol. 2020;64(3):224-231. doi: 10.1159/000502433. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
6
[Significance of p16/Ki-67 double immunocytochemical staining in cervical cytology ASCUS, LSIL, and ASC-H].p16/Ki-67双重免疫细胞化学染色在宫颈细胞学不典型鳞状细胞(ASCUS)、低度鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)及不典型鳞状细胞不排除高度鳞状上皮内病变(ASC-H)中的意义
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Nov 25;52(11):734-739. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.11.004.
7
External quality control of cervical cytopathology: interlaboratory variability.宫颈细胞病理学的外部质量控制:实验室间的变异性
Acta Cytol. 2013;57(6):585-90. doi: 10.1159/000353843. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
8
Silent High Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Atypical Smears from Liquid Based Cervical Cytology - Three Years Experience in Thammasat University Hospital.泰国国立法政大学医院三年经验:液基宫颈细胞学非典型涂片检测中的沉默性高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(9):4353-4356.
9
Team Reading (Peer Review) of Suspicious/Positive Slides for Continuous Quality Improvement in Cervical-Vaginal Cytology: A Comparison between Methods and Indicators.为持续改进宫颈阴道细胞学质量对可疑/阳性涂片进行团队阅片(同行评审):方法与指标的比较
Acta Cytol. 2016;60(5):458-464. doi: 10.1159/000448370. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
10
Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.宫颈细胞学质量指标:单机构研究。
Cytopathology. 2022 Mar;33(2):230-235. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13082. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
External Quality Monitoring of the Cervical Cytopathological Exams in the Rio de Janeiro City.里约热内卢市宫颈细胞病理学检查的外部质量监测
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018 Jun;40(6):338-346. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1657755. Epub 2018 Jun 20.