Suppr超能文献

临时全口、丙烯酸树脂、螺丝固位义齿的悬臂长度和前后伸展及其与修复并发症的关系。

Cantilever Lengths and Anterior-Posterior Spreads of Interim, Acrylic Resin, Full-Arch Screw-Retained Prostheses and Their Relationship to Prosthetic Complications.

机构信息

Gundersen Health System, LaCrosse WI.

Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2017 Aug;26(6):502-507. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12426. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To retrospectively record the distal cantilever lengths (CL) of full-arch interim, all-acrylic resin prostheses used in an immediate occlusal loading protocol. Anterior/posterior (A/P) spreads were measured on master casts associated with the interim prostheses. Ratios were calculated (CL/AP). Prosthetic complications were recorded. The ratios and prosthetic complications were statistically compared and analyzed for statistical and clinical significance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-eight patients with 192 edentulous arches (109 maxillary; 83 mandibular; 190 arches were restored with 4 implants; 2 maxillary arches were restored with 5 implants) were treated. Seven hundred seventy implants (Brånemark System) from September 1, 2011, until August 31, 2013 were included in this report. Patients were treated and followed in a single private practice for up to 40 months. Implants had to have at least 35 Ncm of insertion torque to be immediately loaded. All implants were immediately loaded with full functional occlusions on the day the implants were placed. Interim, full-arch, all-acrylic resin prostheses were fabricated and placed into full functional occlusion following an All-on-Four protocol. Measurements of the distal cantilevered segments were made on the prostheses prior to insertion. A/P spreads were measured on the master casts made from abutment level impressions made on the day of surgery. Prosthetic complications (denture base fracture, cohesive/adhesive denture tooth fractures) were recorded in the charts as they occurred. All charts were reviewed for this report; no patients were lost to follow-up. Interim prosthetic repairs were analyzed by type (tooth or denture base), arch, gender, and location within the edentulous arches.

RESULTS

One patient experienced complete maxillary implant failure; the overall implant survival rate (SR) was 99.5% (766 of 770). Four hundred thirty of 434 maxillary implants and 336 of 336 mandibular implants survived for SRs of 99.1 and 100%, respectively. Thirty four of the 192 interim prostheses (17.7%) warranted at least one repair during treatment. The average cantilevered segments for the interim maxillary prostheses without prosthetic complications were 9.7 mm (right) and 9.5 mm (left). The average cantilevered segments for the repaired maxillary prostheses were 10.1 mm (right); 9.9 mm (left). The average cantilevered segments for the interim mandibular prostheses without prosthetic complications were 9.2 mm (right) and 9.3 mm (left). The average cantilevered segments for the repaired mandibular prostheses were 9.87 mm (right) and 9.18 mm (left). The average maxillary A/P spread was 18.4 mm; the average mandibular A/P spread was 17.3 mm. The average maxillary CL/AP spread ratios were 0.55 (right) and 0.53 (left); the average mandibular CL/AP spread ratios were 0.61 (right) and 0.57 (left). There were no statistical correlations between the CL/AP ratios and the frequency or type of prosthetic repairs recorded in this study. The ratios were statistically significant (p = 0.041) for mandibular prostheses with prosthetic complications: slightly greater CL/A-P ratios were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this 2-year clinical retrospective analysis indicated that CL/AP ratios in the range of 0.5 to 0.6 generally resulted in successful interim prostheses during the time the interim prostheses were in function. The results of this investigation also revealed that 1 of 129 patients experienced implant failures; implants placed and restored on the same day with full-arch, screw-retained prostheses resulted in high clinical survival rates for implants and prostheses. The All-on-Four treatment protocol used in this study was a viable alternative to other implant loading/placement protocols for rehabilitating edentulous patients and resulted in minimal prosthetic complications.

摘要

目的

回顾性记录即刻咬合负载方案中使用的全口临时、全亚克力树脂修复体的远端悬臂长度(CL)。在与临时修复体相关的主模型上测量前后(AP)展开度。计算比例(CL/AP)。记录修复体并发症。对比例和修复体并发症进行统计比较和分析,以确定其统计学和临床意义。

材料和方法

对 192 个无牙颌患者(109 个上颌;83 个下颌;190 个牙弓用 4 个种植体修复;2 个上颌牙弓用 5 个种植体修复)进行了治疗。从 2011 年 9 月 1 日至 2013 年 8 月 31 日,共纳入 770 个种植体(Brånemark 系统)。患者在一家私人诊所接受治疗和随访,最长时间为 40 个月。种植体的插入扭矩至少为 35 Ncm 才能立即加载。所有种植体在放置当天均采用全功能咬合立即加载。根据 All-on-Four 方案制作并放置全口临时、全亚克力树脂修复体,使其处于全功能咬合状态。在插入前测量远端悬臂段的尺寸。在手术当天的基台水平印模上制作主模型,测量 AP 展开度。在图表中记录修复体并发症(义齿基托折断、固位/粘固义齿牙折断),并在发生时进行记录。本报告对所有图表进行了回顾分析,没有患者失访。对临时修复体的修复类型(牙或义齿基托)、牙弓、性别和无牙颌牙槽嵴内的位置进行了分析。

结果

1 例患者上颌种植体完全失败;总体种植体存活率(SR)为 99.5%(766/770)。434 个上颌种植体中有 410 个和 336 个下颌种植体的存活率分别为 99.1%和 100%。在治疗过程中,34 个临时修复体(17.7%)需要至少一次修复。无修复体并发症的临时上颌修复体的平均悬臂段为 9.7mm(右侧)和 9.5mm(左侧)。修复后的上颌修复体的平均悬臂段为 10.1mm(右侧)和 9.9mm(左侧)。无修复体并发症的临时下颌修复体的平均悬臂段为 9.2mm(右侧)和 9.3mm(左侧)。修复后的下颌修复体的平均悬臂段为 9.87mm(右侧)和 9.18mm(左侧)。上颌的平均 AP 展开度为 18.4mm;下颌的平均 AP 展开度为 17.3mm。上颌的平均 CL/AP 展开比为 0.55(右侧)和 0.53(左侧);下颌的平均 CL/AP 展开比为 0.61(右侧)和 0.57(左侧)。本研究记录的修复体修复类型和频率与 CL/AP 比值之间没有统计学相关性。下颌修复体的比值具有统计学意义(p=0.041),与修复体并发症有关:稍大的 CL/AP 比值与下颌修复体有关。

结论

这项为期 2 年的临床回顾性分析结果表明,CL/AP 比值在 0.5 到 0.6 的范围内,通常会导致临时修复体在功能期间获得成功。本研究结果还表明,1 例患者发生种植体失败;同一天用全口、螺丝固位修复体放置和修复种植体,使种植体和修复体具有较高的临床存活率。本研究采用的 All-on-Four 治疗方案是一种替代其他种植体加载/放置方案的可行方法,可用于修复无牙颌患者,且修复体并发症较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验