• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无牙下颌即刻临时修复中使用非翻瓣技术植入倾斜种植体后的牙槽嵴稳定性:一项前瞻性对照临床试验。

Crestal bone stability after flapless placement of sloped implants with immediate temporization in edentulous mandible. A prospective comparative clinical trial.

机构信息

Vilnius Research Group, Private Practice VIC Clinic, Vilnius, Lithuania.

VIC Clinic, Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Apr;7(2):131-136. doi: 10.1002/cre2.352. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1002/cre2.352
PMID:33283487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8019769/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate crestal bone stability around sloped implants using the flapless procedure and compare it with conventional implants placed axially.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 40 bone-level implants with platform switching were used for this study for 10 patients (4 males and 6 females) in edentulous mandible. Twenty mesial conventional implants were placed in upright position and 20 distal 30° sloped implants tilted 30°. Bone loss was estimated using radiographic imaging after a 6- and a 12-month follow-up period. Comparison of the bone loss in the distal and mesial region at both implantation angles were conducted to understand the nature and progression of crestal bone loss.

RESULTS

Crestal bone loss around the sloped implants was 0.29 mm (SD = 0.292) on average, while around conventional implants it was 0.22 mm (SD = 0.202) after one-year follow-up. However, there was no significant difference in the average of crestal bone loss between two trial groups after 6 months (p < 0.243) and one-year (p < 0.614) follow-up. The results indicated a 100% implant survival rate after one-year follow-up. Additionally, three fixed prostheses needed realignment after fracturing during the follow-up time.

CONCLUSION

Considering the limitations of this study, it can be presumed that sloped and conventional implants with platform switching and conical connection have the same potential for minimal crestal bone loss.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用无瓣技术的倾斜种植体周围的牙槽嵴骨稳定性,并将其与轴向放置的传统种植体进行比较。

材料与方法

本研究共使用 40 个具有平台转换功能的骨水平种植体,用于 10 名无牙颌下颌骨患者(4 名男性,6 名女性)。20 个近中常规种植体垂直放置,20 个远中 30°倾斜种植体倾斜 30°。在 6 个月和 12 个月的随访期间,使用影像学评估骨丢失情况。比较两种植入角度的远中和近中区域的骨丢失情况,以了解牙槽嵴骨丢失的性质和进展。

结果

倾斜种植体周围的牙槽嵴骨丢失平均为 0.29mm(SD=0.292),而常规种植体周围的牙槽嵴骨丢失为 0.22mm(SD=0.202),随访 1 年后。然而,在 6 个月(p<0.243)和 1 年(p<0.614)随访时,两组试验的平均牙槽嵴骨丢失无显著差异。结果表明,随访 1 年后种植体的存活率为 100%。此外,在随访期间,有 3 个固定修复体因断裂需要重新调整。

结论

考虑到本研究的局限性,可以推测使用无瓣技术的倾斜种植体和传统种植体具有相同的最小牙槽嵴骨丢失潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/8019769/8effa9432074/CRE2-7-131-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/8019769/569957ad0ffd/CRE2-7-131-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/8019769/70aa71fcd2fe/CRE2-7-131-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/8019769/8effa9432074/CRE2-7-131-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/8019769/569957ad0ffd/CRE2-7-131-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/8019769/70aa71fcd2fe/CRE2-7-131-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/8019769/8effa9432074/CRE2-7-131-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Crestal bone stability after flapless placement of sloped implants with immediate temporization in edentulous mandible. A prospective comparative clinical trial.无牙下颌即刻临时修复中使用非翻瓣技术植入倾斜种植体后的牙槽嵴稳定性:一项前瞻性对照临床试验。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Apr;7(2):131-136. doi: 10.1002/cre2.352. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
2
Comparative evaluation of circumferential crestal bone loss after 1 year of implant placement with flapless versus flap surgery using surgical template after immediate loading in the posterior mandibular region using cone-beam computed tomography: A randomized controlled trial.应用锥形束 CT 评估即刻负重后在后牙区使用外科模板行无瓣与有瓣种植手术 1 年后种植体周边缘骨丧失的对比:一项随机对照试验。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Jul-Sep;23(3):226-233. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_129_23.
3
Comparative evaluation of soft and hard tissue changes following endosseous implant placement using flap and flapless techniques in the posterior edentulous areas of the mandible-a randomized controlled trial.在下颌后牙缺失区使用翻瓣和不翻瓣技术植入骨内种植体后软硬组织变化的比较评估——一项随机对照试验
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;22(2):215-223. doi: 10.1007/s10006-018-0695-9. Epub 2018 May 5.
4
The fate of marginal bone around axial vs. tilted implants: a systematic review.轴向种植体与倾斜种植体周围边缘骨的转归:一项系统评价
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Summer;7 Suppl 2:S171-89.
5
Ten-year follow-up of dental implants used for immediate loading in the edentulous mandible: A prospective clinical study.十年随访即刻负载在下颌无牙颌中使用的牙种植体:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Aug;20(4):515-521. doi: 10.1111/cid.12612. Epub 2018 May 23.
6
Crestal Bone Loss under Delayed Loading of Full Thickness Versus Flapless Surgically Placed Dental Implants in Controlled Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Parallel Group Randomized Clinical Trial.全厚层即刻负重与无瓣微创外科植入种植体在 2 型糖尿病患者中牙槽骨丧失的对比:一项平行组随机临床试验。
J Prosthodont. 2018 Aug;27(7):611-617. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12549. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
7
Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.微间隙大小对非潜入式牙种植体嵴顶骨水平的影响:犬下颌骨的影像学研究
J Periodontol. 2002 Oct;73(10):1111-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.10.1111.
8
Radiological comparison of laser-microtextured and platform-switched implants in thin mucosal biotype.薄黏膜生物型中激光微纹理种植体与平台转换种植体的影像学比较
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 May;26(5):599-605. doi: 10.1111/clr.12544. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
9
A prospective multicenter clinical trial comparing one- and two-stage titanium screw-shaped fixtures with one-stage plasma-sprayed solid-screw fixtures.一项前瞻性多中心临床试验,比较单阶段和两阶段钛螺旋形种植体与单阶段等离子喷涂实心螺旋种植体。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2(3):159-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00007.x.
10
The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial.软组织厚度对种植体周围嵴顶骨变化的影响:一项为期1年的前瞻性对照临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):712-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical efficacy of two vertical soft tissue augmentation techniques for peri-implant crestal bone level stability: A randomized clinical trial.两种垂直软组织增量技术对种植体周围嵴顶骨水平稳定性的临床疗效:一项随机临床试验
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Dec;26(6):1086-1100. doi: 10.1111/cid.13365. Epub 2024 Aug 11.
2
Rehabilitation Using Implants with Sloped Platform Edge vs. Standard Platform with Guided Bone Regeneration: A Randomized Control Clinical Trial.使用带倾斜平台边缘种植体与标准平台种植体并结合引导骨再生的康复治疗:一项随机对照临床试验。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 4;12(7):205. doi: 10.3390/dj12070205.
3
Influence of the Tube Angle on the Measurement Accuracy of Peri-Implant Bone Defects in Rectangular Intraoral X-ray Imaging.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Different Positions and Angles of Implants in Maxillary Edentulous Jaw on Surrounding Bone Stress under Dynamic Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.上颌无牙颌种植体不同位置和角度对动态加载下周围骨应力的影响:三维有限元分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2019 Dec 17;2019:8074096. doi: 10.1155/2019/8074096. eCollection 2019.
2
The effect of implant placement torque on crestal bone remodeling after 1 year of loading.种植体植入扭矩对加载1年后牙槽嵴骨改建的影响。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018 Oct 9;10:203-209. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S174895. eCollection 2018.
3
Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
口腔内矩形X线成像中管角度对种植体周围骨缺损测量准确性的影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 10;13(2):391. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020391.
4
What Does Bone Corticalization around Dental Implants Mean in Light of Ten Years of Follow-Up?基于十年随访,种植牙周围骨皮质化意味着什么?
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):3545. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123545.
通过三维有限元分析比较All-on-4治疗理念中不同种植体倾斜度和悬臂长度的生物力学特性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):64-71. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6201.
4
Initial and long-term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants.现代牙种植体的初始和长期牙槽骨反应。
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):41-50. doi: 10.1111/prd.12176.
5
Partial Rehabilitation with Distally Tilted and Straight Implants in the Posterior Maxilla with Immediate Loading Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 5-Year Follow-up.采用即刻负重方案,使用远中倾斜和直立种植体对上颌后牙区进行部分修复:一项为期5年随访的回顾性队列研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):891-9. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4324.
6
Minimally invasive flapless vs. flapped approach for single implant placement: a 2-year randomized controlled clinical trial.微创无瓣与有瓣方法在单牙种植中的应用:一项为期 2 年的随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jun;28(6):757-764. doi: 10.1111/clr.12875. Epub 2016 May 19.
7
Mandibular Full-Arch Fixed Prostheses Supported on 4 Implants with Either Axial Or Tilted Distal Implants: A 3-Year Prospective Study.下颌全牙弓固定修复体由4颗种植体支持,种植体采用轴向或倾斜远中种植体:一项3年前瞻性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Dec;18(6):1119-1133. doi: 10.1111/cid.12419. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
8
Retrospective analysis of the prevalence of peri-implant diseases in non-smoking patients rehabilitated with a fixed full-arch restoration, supported by two mesial axial and two distal tilted implants.对采用两颗近中轴向种植体和两颗远中倾斜种植体支持的固定全牙弓修复体修复的非吸烟患者种植体周围疾病患病率的回顾性分析。
Minerva Stomatol. 2016 Jun;65(3):164-75.
9
The Comparison of Stress Distribution with Different Implant Numbers and Inclination Angles In All-on-four and Conventional Methods in Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis.上颌全口四颗种植体与传统方法中不同种植体数量和倾斜角度下应力分布的比较:有限元分析
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015 Fall;9(4):246-53. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2015.044. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
10
Cantilever Lengths and Anterior-Posterior Spreads of Interim, Acrylic Resin, Full-Arch Screw-Retained Prostheses and Their Relationship to Prosthetic Complications.临时全口、丙烯酸树脂、螺丝固位义齿的悬臂长度和前后伸展及其与修复并发症的关系。
J Prosthodont. 2017 Aug;26(6):502-507. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12426. Epub 2016 Feb 5.