Suppr超能文献

无牙下颌即刻临时修复中使用非翻瓣技术植入倾斜种植体后的牙槽嵴稳定性:一项前瞻性对照临床试验。

Crestal bone stability after flapless placement of sloped implants with immediate temporization in edentulous mandible. A prospective comparative clinical trial.

机构信息

Vilnius Research Group, Private Practice VIC Clinic, Vilnius, Lithuania.

VIC Clinic, Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Apr;7(2):131-136. doi: 10.1002/cre2.352. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate crestal bone stability around sloped implants using the flapless procedure and compare it with conventional implants placed axially.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 40 bone-level implants with platform switching were used for this study for 10 patients (4 males and 6 females) in edentulous mandible. Twenty mesial conventional implants were placed in upright position and 20 distal 30° sloped implants tilted 30°. Bone loss was estimated using radiographic imaging after a 6- and a 12-month follow-up period. Comparison of the bone loss in the distal and mesial region at both implantation angles were conducted to understand the nature and progression of crestal bone loss.

RESULTS

Crestal bone loss around the sloped implants was 0.29 mm (SD = 0.292) on average, while around conventional implants it was 0.22 mm (SD = 0.202) after one-year follow-up. However, there was no significant difference in the average of crestal bone loss between two trial groups after 6 months (p < 0.243) and one-year (p < 0.614) follow-up. The results indicated a 100% implant survival rate after one-year follow-up. Additionally, three fixed prostheses needed realignment after fracturing during the follow-up time.

CONCLUSION

Considering the limitations of this study, it can be presumed that sloped and conventional implants with platform switching and conical connection have the same potential for minimal crestal bone loss.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用无瓣技术的倾斜种植体周围的牙槽嵴骨稳定性,并将其与轴向放置的传统种植体进行比较。

材料与方法

本研究共使用 40 个具有平台转换功能的骨水平种植体,用于 10 名无牙颌下颌骨患者(4 名男性,6 名女性)。20 个近中常规种植体垂直放置,20 个远中 30°倾斜种植体倾斜 30°。在 6 个月和 12 个月的随访期间,使用影像学评估骨丢失情况。比较两种植入角度的远中和近中区域的骨丢失情况,以了解牙槽嵴骨丢失的性质和进展。

结果

倾斜种植体周围的牙槽嵴骨丢失平均为 0.29mm(SD=0.292),而常规种植体周围的牙槽嵴骨丢失为 0.22mm(SD=0.202),随访 1 年后。然而,在 6 个月(p<0.243)和 1 年(p<0.614)随访时,两组试验的平均牙槽嵴骨丢失无显著差异。结果表明,随访 1 年后种植体的存活率为 100%。此外,在随访期间,有 3 个固定修复体因断裂需要重新调整。

结论

考虑到本研究的局限性,可以推测使用无瓣技术的倾斜种植体和传统种植体具有相同的最小牙槽嵴骨丢失潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/8019769/569957ad0ffd/CRE2-7-131-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验