• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利拉鲁肽对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者无复流现象的影响。

Effects of liraglutide on no-reflow in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Chen Wei Ren, Tian Feng, Chen Yun Dai, Wang Jing, Yang Jun Jie, Wang Zhi Feng, Da Wang Jin, Ning Qing Xiu

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, PLA General Hospital, at Beijing, China.

Department of Cardiology, PLA General Hospital, at Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 1;208:109-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.12.009
PMID:26849684
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 'no-reflow' phenomenon after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a strong predictor of both short- and long-term mortality. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) exerts a cardioprotective effect during ischemia reperfusion injury. We planned to evaluate the effects of liraglutide on myocardial no-reflow after PCI for STEMI.

METHODS

A total of 284 patients with STEMI undergoing PCI were enrolled in this study between September 2013 and March 2015. Of these, 210 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either liraglutide or placebo 30 min before PCI (1.8 mg).

RESULTS

The primary end point, the prevalence of no-reflow, was significantly lower in the liraglutide group than in the control group (5% vs. 15%, P=0.01). Administration of liraglutide was consistently identified as a significant determinant for no-reflow ratio. There was a significant decrease in serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels at 6-hour reperfusion in the liraglutide group compared to the control group (0.87 ± 0.09 mg/dL vs. 0.96 ± 0.10mg/dL, P<0.001). During a 3-month follow-up period, no difference was observed in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event.

CONCLUSIONS

Liraglutide may be associated with less no-reflow in STEMI, which should be confirmed by larger-scale trials.

摘要

背景

急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后出现的“无复流”现象是短期和长期死亡率的有力预测指标。胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)在缺血再灌注损伤期间发挥心脏保护作用。我们计划评估利拉鲁肽对STEMI患者PCI术后心肌无复流的影响。

方法

2013年9月至2015年3月期间,共有284例接受PCI的STEMI患者纳入本研究。其中,210例患者按1:1随机分组,在PCI术前30分钟接受利拉鲁肽(1.8mg)或安慰剂治疗。

结果

主要终点,即无复流的发生率,利拉鲁肽组显著低于对照组(5%对15%,P=0.01)。利拉鲁肽的使用一直被确定为无复流率的重要决定因素。与对照组相比,利拉鲁肽组在再灌注6小时时血清高敏C反应蛋白水平显著降低(0.87±0.09mg/dL对0.96±0.10mg/dL,P<0.001)。在3个月的随访期内,主要不良心血管事件的发生率未观察到差异。

结论

利拉鲁肽可能与STEMI患者较少的无复流相关,这一点应通过大规模试验予以证实。

相似文献

1
Effects of liraglutide on no-reflow in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.利拉鲁肽对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者无复流现象的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 1;208:109-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
2
Predictive value of admission red cell distribution width-platelet ratio for no-reflow phenomenon in acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.入院时红细胞分布宽度-血小板比值对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者无复流现象的预测价值
Cardiol J. 2016;23(1):84-92. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2015.0070. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
3
Effects of Liraglutide on Reperfusion Injury in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.利拉鲁肽对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者再灌注损伤的影响
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Dec;9(12). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005146.
4
Effects of liraglutide on left ventricular function in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.利拉鲁肽对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者左心室功能的影响。
Am Heart J. 2015 Nov;170(5):845-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
5
Coronary artery ectasia, an independent predictor of no-reflow after primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.冠状动脉扩张是 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无复流的独立预测因子。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 15;265:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.120. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
6
Usefulness of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting angiographic reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.血小板与淋巴细胞比值对急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血管造影再通的预测价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 1;114(3):342-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.045. Epub 2014 May 15.
7
Impact of ultrasound attenuation and plaque rupture as detected by intravascular ultrasound on the incidence of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.血管内超声检测的超声衰减和斑块破裂对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无复流现象发生率的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 May;3(5):540-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.01.015.
8
Impact of clopidogrel resistance on ST-segment resolution and no-reflow in acute myocardial infarction with ST-elevation patients treated with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention.氯吡格雷抵抗对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者ST段回落及无复流现象的影响
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Dec;23(8):523-7. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283596c29.
9
Serum B-type natriuretic peptide on admission can predict the 'no-reflow' phenomenon after primary drug-eluting stent implantation for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.入院时的血清 B 型利钠肽可预测 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接药物洗脱支架置入术后的“无复流”现象。
Int J Cardiol. 2010 May 28;141(2):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.11.189. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
10
The impact of NT-proBNP on admission for early risk stratification of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.NT-proBNP 对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者早期风险分层入院的影响。
Kardiol Pol. 2013;71(2):165-75. doi: 10.5603/KP.2013.0011.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of oral nicorandil administration prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention on no-reflow: a randomized controlled trial.在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前口服尼可地尔对无复流的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02734-0.
2
Reduced adenosine receptor expression in ACS patients with no-reflow phenomenon undergoing primary PCI.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的无复流现象急性冠状动脉综合征患者腺苷受体表达降低。
Future Cardiol. 2025 Jan;21(1):23-29. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2445419. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
3
[Angiographic result with the use of adenosine before percutaneous coronary intervention in pharmacoinvasive therapy].
[药物侵入性治疗中经皮冠状动脉介入术前使用腺苷的血管造影结果]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 May 6;62(3):1-7. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10998706.
4
Therapeutic Potential of Sodium-glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review of Clinical Evidence.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床疗效评价。
Curr Pharm Des. 2024;30(27):2109-2119. doi: 10.2174/0113816128304097240529053538.
5
Role of glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis.胰高血糖素样肽-1激动剂在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Am Heart J Plus. 2021 Oct 25;11:100063. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2021.100063. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
The role and mechanisms of microvascular damage in the ischemic myocardium.微血管损伤在缺血性心肌中的作用和机制。
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2023 Oct 29;80(11):341. doi: 10.1007/s00018-023-04998-z.
7
Incretins-Based Therapies and Their Cardiovascular Effects: New Game-Changers for the Management of Patients with Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease.基于肠促胰岛素的疗法及其心血管效应:糖尿病和心血管疾病患者管理的新变革者。
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jul 1;15(7):1858. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071858.
8
GLP-1RAs caused gastrointestinal adverse reactions of drug withdrawal: a system review and network meta-analysis.GLP-1RA 引起药物撤药时的胃肠道不良反应:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 6;14:1149328. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1149328. eCollection 2023.
9
Glycaemic Control in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: What Is the Role for the Novel Antidiabetic Agents? .接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的血糖控制:新型抗糖尿病药物的作用是什么?
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 30;23(13):7261. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137261.
10
Myocardial preservation during primary percutaneous intervention: It's time to rethink?直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的心肌保护:是时候重新思考了?
Indian Heart J. 2021 Jul-Aug;73(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.07.008. Epub 2021 Jul 28.