Gessler Florian, Mutlak Haitham, Tizi Karima, Senft Christian, Setzer Matthias, Seifert Volker, Weise Lutz
Departments of 1 Neurosurgery and.
Anesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):965-70. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15415. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
OBJECTIVE The value of postoperative epidural analgesia after major spinal surgery is well established. Thus far, the use of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has been denied to patients undergoing debridement and instrumentation in spondylodiscitis, with the risk of increased postoperative pain resulting in prolonged recovery. The value of PCEA with special regard to infectious complications remains to be clarified. The present study examined the value of postoperative PCEA in comparison with intravenous analgesia in patients with spondylodiscitis undergoing posterior spinal surgery. METHODS Thirty-two patients treated surgically for spondylodiscitis of the thoracic and lumbar spine were prospectively included in a database and retrospectively reviewed for this study. Postoperative antibiotic treatment, functional capacity, pain levels, side effects, and complications were documented. Sixteen patients were given patient-demanded intravenous analgesia (PIA) followed by 16 patients assigned to PCEA. If PCEA was applied, the insertion of an epidural catheter was performed under the direct visual guidance of the surgeon at the end of the surgery. RESULTS Three patients intended for PCEA treatment were excluded due to predefined exclusion criteria. Postoperative pain was significantly lower in the PCEA group during the first 48 hours after surgery (p = 0.03). As determined by the trunk control test conducted at 8 (p < 0.001), 24 (p = 0.004), 48 (p = 0.015), 72 (p = 0.0031), and 96 hours (p < 0.001), patients in the PCEA treatment group displayed significantly increased mobilization capacity compared with those of the PIA group. Time until normal accomplishment of all mobilization maneuvers was reduced in the PCEA group compared with that in the PIA group (p = 0.04). No differences in complication rates were observed between the 2 groups (p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS PCEA may reduce postoperative pain and lead to earlier achievement of functional capacity at a low complication rate in patients with surgically treated lumbar and thoracic spondylodiscitis.
目的 脊柱大手术后硬膜外镇痛的价值已得到充分证实。到目前为止,对于因脊椎椎间盘炎接受清创和器械植入手术的患者,一直未采用患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA),因为术后疼痛加剧可能导致恢复时间延长。PCEA在感染性并发症方面的价值仍有待阐明。本研究比较了PCEA与静脉镇痛在因脊椎椎间盘炎接受后路脊柱手术患者中的术后效果。方法 前瞻性纳入32例因胸腰椎脊椎椎间盘炎接受手术治疗的患者,并录入数据库,本研究对其进行回顾性分析。记录术后抗生素治疗、功能能力、疼痛程度、副作用和并发症情况。16例患者接受按需静脉镇痛(PIA),随后16例患者接受PCEA。若采用PCEA,在手术结束时由外科医生直接目视引导下插入硬膜外导管。结果 3例计划接受PCEA治疗的患者因预定义的排除标准被排除。术后48小时内,PCEA组的术后疼痛明显低于PIA组(p = 0.03)。在术后8小时(p < 0.001)、24小时(p = 0.004)、48小时(p = 0.015)、72小时(p = 0.0031)和96小时(p < 0.001)进行的躯干控制测试表明,与PIA组相比,PCEA治疗组患者的活动能力明显增强。与PIA组相比,PCEA组完成所有活动动作恢复正常的时间缩短(p = 0.04)。两组并发症发生率无差异(p = 0.52)。结论 PCEA可能降低因胸腰椎脊椎椎间盘炎接受手术治疗患者的术后疼痛,并以低并发症率使功能能力更早恢复。