• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筛查与非筛查结肠镜检查的差异:有改进的空间吗?

Differences in screening vs non-screening colonoscopy: scope for improvement?

机构信息

Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2016 Sep;18(9):903-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.13291.

DOI:10.1111/codi.13291
PMID:26850216
Abstract

AIM

Colonoscopy performed as part of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) is of high standard as measured using global rating scale (GRS) criteria. Screening practitioners also provide a non-screening colonoscopy service. The current study compares colonoscopy quality indicators between screening and non-screening groups performed by a single practitioner using the GRS.

METHOD

Patient details were obtained for all consecutive colonoscopies between 2007 and 2014 performed by a single screening practitioner. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic patient records; BCSP Exeter database and non-screening colonoscopies were compared. Data included patient demographics (age, gender), sedation, and the GRS data including caecal intubation, adenoma and neoplasia detection rates.

RESULTS

In all, 1961 colonoscopy procedures (1067 screening and 894 non-screening) were identified; 57% were men. Mean (SD) age for all patients was 64 (± 10.4) years. Non-screening patients were younger [62 (± 14) vs 66 (± 4.8) years; P < 0.05] and were less likely to be men (51.5% vs 61.9%; P < 0.05) than their screening counterparts. Caecal intubation was more successful in screening patients [1027/1067 (96.3%)] than non-screening patients [805/894 (90%)]; P < 0.05. Adenoma detection rate was higher in the screening (46.8 ± 4.4) than non-screening (26.3 ± 11.8) group; P < 0.05. There were no differences in neoplasia detection. Polypectomy was more likely (55.5% vs 30.2%) and polyp retrieval more successful (97.5% vs 86.7%) in the screening group.

CONCLUSION

Screening and non-screening colonoscopy differ in the GRS domains of completion and pathology detection. These differences need to be acknowledged when comparing screeners and non-screeners using GRS within units.

摘要

目的

使用全球评分量表(GRS)标准衡量,作为国民保健制度(NHS)结直肠癌筛查计划(BCSP)一部分的结肠镜检查具有高标准。筛查医生还提供非筛查结肠镜检查服务。本研究比较了同一位医生进行的筛查组和非筛查组的结肠镜检查质量指标,使用 GRS 进行评估。

方法

收集了 2007 年至 2014 年间由一位筛查医生进行的所有连续结肠镜检查的患者详细信息。数据从电子患者记录、埃克塞特 BCSP 数据库中回顾性收集,比较了筛查和非筛查结肠镜检查。数据包括患者人口统计学信息(年龄、性别)、镇静情况以及 GRS 数据,包括盲肠插管、腺瘤和肿瘤检出率。

结果

共确定了 1961 例结肠镜检查(1067 例筛查和 894 例非筛查);57%为男性。所有患者的平均(标准差)年龄为 64(±10.4)岁。非筛查患者年龄较小[62(±14)岁比 66(±4.8)岁;P<0.05],男性比例较低(51.5%比 61.9%;P<0.05)。筛查患者的盲肠插管成功率更高[1027/1067(96.3%)],而非筛查患者为[805/894(90%)];P<0.05。筛查组的腺瘤检出率较高[46.8±4.4],而非筛查组为[26.3±11.8];P<0.05。两组在肿瘤检出率方面无差异。在筛查组中,息肉切除术更有可能(55.5%比 30.2%),息肉回收更成功(97.5%比 86.7%)。

结论

筛查和非筛查结肠镜检查在完成情况和病理检测的 GRS 领域存在差异。在单位内使用 GRS 比较筛查者和非筛查者时,需要注意这些差异。

相似文献

1
Differences in screening vs non-screening colonoscopy: scope for improvement?筛查与非筛查结肠镜检查的差异:有改进的空间吗?
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Sep;18(9):903-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.13291.
2
Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.结肠镜检查质量指标:来自英国国民保健署结直肠癌筛查计划的经验。
Gut. 2012 Jul;61(7):1050-7. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300651. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
3
High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.在奥地利,高质量的结肠镜筛查并不取决于内镜医师的专业或检查地点。
Endoscopy. 2015 Mar;47(3):207-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390910. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
4
Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.在伊朗这个结直肠癌发病率不断上升的国家,一项机会性筛查结肠镜检查项目中的腺瘤检出率。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 18;14:196. doi: 10.1186/s12876-014-0196-8.
5
The first 3 years of national bowel cancer screening at a single UK tertiary centre.英国一家三级中心开展全国结直肠癌筛查的头 3 年。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):166-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02567.x.
6
The mean number of adenomas per procedure should become the gold standard to measure the neoplasia yield of colonoscopy: a population-based cohort study.每例手术中腺瘤的平均数量应成为衡量结肠镜检查肿瘤检出率的金标准:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Feb;46(2):176-81. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.08.129. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
7
Practice patterns of sedation for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查镇静的实践模式。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):503-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.041. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
8
A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.一种对腺瘤检测具有重大影响的新方法:联合水交换和帽辅助结肠镜检查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
9
Full spectrum endoscopy (FUSE) versus standard forward-viewing endoscope (SFV) in a high-risk population.高风险人群中全光谱内镜检查(FUSE)与标准前视内镜(SFV)的比较
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov;52(11):1298-1303. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1363278. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
10
Colonoscopy conversion after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: results from the UK Bowel Scope Screening Programme.结肠镜检查转换后灵活乙状结肠镜检查筛查:来自英国肠道范围筛选计划的结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jun;20(6):502-508. doi: 10.1111/codi.13982.

引用本文的文献

1
The Risk of Colorectal Polyps after Weight Loss Therapy Versus Obesity: A Propensity-Matched Nationwide Cohort Study.减肥疗法与肥胖相比导致大肠息肉的风险:一项倾向匹配的全国队列研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 30;15(19):4820. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194820.
2
The impact of surgical weight loss procedures on the risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia: the differential effect of surgery type, sex, and anatomic location.手术减肥术对结直肠异时性肿瘤风险的影响:手术类型、性别和解剖部位的差异效应。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2023 May 4;2023(61):77-83. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac029.
3
Heterogeneity in colorectal cancer incidence among people recommended 3-yearly surveillance post-polypectomy: a validation study.
结直肠癌患者息肉切除术后推荐每 3 年进行一次监测的人群中发病率的异质性:验证性研究。
Endoscopy. 2021 Apr;53(4):402-410. doi: 10.1055/a-1217-0155. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
4
Impact of the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) on endoscopy services in the UK and beyond.胃肠内镜检查联合咨询小组(JAG)对英国及其他地区内镜检查服务的影响。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;10(2):93-106. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-100969. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
5
Accredited residents perform colonoscopy to the same high standards as consultants.认证住院医师行结肠镜检查的标准与顾问医师相同。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1377-1381. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5818-0. Epub 2017 Aug 15.