Kawaguchi Masahiko, Shimada Masanari, Ishikawa Norihiko, Watanabe Go
a Department of General and Cardiothoracic Surgery , Kanazawa University , Ishikawa , Japan.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25(3):129-33. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2016.1141103. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
Laparoscopic and robotic surgeries have become popular, and this popularity is increasing. However, the environment in which such surgeries are performed is rarely discussed. Similar to arthrosurgery performed in water, artificial ascites could be a new environment for laparoscopic surgery. This study was performed to determine whether robotic surgery is applicable to complicated suturing underwater.
A da Vinci Surgical System S was used. A weighted fabric sheet was placed at the bottom of a tank. Identical sets were made for each environment: One tank was dry, and the other was filled with water. The suturing task involved placement of a running silk suture around the perimeter of a small circle. The task was performed eight times in each environment. The task time and integrity score were determined. The integrity score was calculated by evaluating accuracy, tightness, thread damage, and uniformity; each factor was evaluated using a five-point scale.
Although statistically significant differences were not shown in either task time or integrity score between the underwater and air environments, robotic suturing underwater is not inferior to performance in air.
The feasibility of robotic suturing underwater was confirmed under the herein-described experimental conditions.
腹腔镜手术和机器人手术已变得流行,且这种流行程度正在增加。然而,此类手术的实施环境却很少被讨论。类似于在水中进行的关节手术,人工腹水可能成为腹腔镜手术的一种新环境。本研究旨在确定机器人手术是否适用于水下复杂缝合。
使用达芬奇手术系统S。在水箱底部放置一块加重的织物片。为每个环境制作相同的装置:一个水箱是干燥的,另一个装满水。缝合任务包括在一个小圆圈的周边放置连续的丝线缝合。该任务在每个环境中进行8次。确定任务时间和完整性评分。完整性评分通过评估准确性、紧密性、缝线损伤和均匀性来计算;每个因素使用五点量表进行评估。
尽管水下和空气环境之间在任务时间或完整性评分上均未显示出统计学上的显著差异,但水下机器人缝合并不逊色于在空气中的操作。
在本文所述的实验条件下,证实了水下机器人缝合的可行性。