Suppr超能文献

美国国立综合癌症网络各机构间局部晚期非小细胞肺癌确定性治疗的差异

Variation in Definitive Therapy for Localized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Among National Comprehensive Cancer Network Institutions.

作者信息

Valle Luca F, Jagsi Reshma, Bobiak Sarah N, Zornosa Carrie, D'Amico Thomas A, Pisters Katherine M, Dexter Elisabeth U, Niland Joyce C, Hayman James A, Kapadia Nirav S

机构信息

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Feb 1;94(2):360-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.030. Epub 2015 Oct 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study determined practice patterns in the staging and treatment of patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) member institutions. Secondary aims were to determine trends in the use of definitive therapy, predictors of treatment type, and acute adverse events associated with primary modalities of treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Oncology Outcomes Database from 2007 to 2011 for US patients with stage I NSCLC were used. Main outcome measures included patterns of care, predictors of treatment, acute morbidity, and acute mortality.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine percent of patients received surgery, 16% received definitive radiation therapy (RT), and 3% were not treated. Seventy-four percent of the RT patients received stereotactic body RT (SBRT), and the remainder received nonstereotactic RT (NSRT). Among participating NCCN member institutions, the number of surgeries-to-RT course ratios varied between 1.6 and 34.7 (P<.01), and the SBRT-to-NSRT ratio varied between 0 and 13 (P=.01). Significant variations were also observed in staging practices, with brain imaging 0.33 (0.25-0.43) times as likely and mediastinoscopy 31.26 (21.84-44.76) times more likely for surgical patients than for RT patients. Toxicity rates for surgical and for SBRT patients were similar, although the rates were double for NSRT patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The variations in treatment observed among NCCN institutions reflects the lack of level I evidence directing the use of surgery or SBRT for stage I NSCLC. In this setting, research of patient and physician preferences may help to guide future decision making.

摘要

目的

本研究确定了美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)成员机构中I期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者分期和治疗的实践模式。次要目的是确定确定性治疗的使用趋势、治疗类型的预测因素以及与主要治疗方式相关的急性不良事件。

方法和材料

使用2007年至2011年美国I期NSCLC患者的国立综合癌症网络肿瘤学结局数据库中的数据。主要结局指标包括治疗模式、治疗预测因素、急性发病率和急性死亡率。

结果

79%的患者接受了手术,16%接受了确定性放射治疗(RT),3%未接受治疗。74%的接受RT的患者接受了立体定向体部放疗(SBRT),其余患者接受了非立体定向放疗(NSRT)。在参与的NCCN成员机构中,手术与RT疗程比在1.6至34.7之间变化(P<0.01),SBRT与NSRT比在0至13之间变化(P=0.01)。在分期实践中也观察到显著差异,手术患者进行脑成像的可能性是RT患者的0.33(0.25 - 0.43)倍,进行纵隔镜检查的可能性是RT患者的31.26(21.84 - 44.76)倍。手术患者和SBRT患者的毒性率相似,尽管NSRT患者的毒性率是前者的两倍。

结论

NCCN机构间观察到的治疗差异反映了缺乏指导I期NSCLC手术或SBRT使用的I级证据。在此情况下,对患者和医生偏好的研究可能有助于指导未来的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验