Stellbrink Hans-Jürgen, Le Fevre Eric, Carr Andrew, Saag Michael S, Mukwaya Geoffrey, Nozza Silvia, Valluri Srinivas Rao, Vourvahis Manoli, Rinehart Alex R, McFadyen Lynn, Fichtenbaum Carl, Clark Andrew, Craig Charles, Fang Annie F, Heera Jayvant
aICH-Study Center, Hamburg, Germany bViiV Healthcare, Brentford, UK cSt. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia dUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama ePfizer Inc., New York, New York, USA fOspedale San Raffaele, Divisione di Malattie Infettive, Milan, Italy gViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA hPfizer Inc., Sandwich, UK iDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA jViiV Healthcare, London kThe Research Network, Sandwich, UK lPfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut, USA.
AIDS. 2016 May 15;30(8):1229-38. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001058.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of maraviroc along with darunavir/ritonavir, all once daily, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 infected individuals.
MODERN was a multicentre, double-blind, noninferiority, phase III study in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral-naive adults with plasma HIV-1 RNA at least 1000 copies/ml and no evidence of reduced susceptibility to study drugs.
At screening, participants were randomized 1 : 1 to undergo either genotypic or phenotypic tropism testing. Participants with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 were randomized 1 : 1 to receive maraviroc 150 mg once daily or tenofovir/emtricitabine once daily each with darunavir/ritonavir once daily for 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml (Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm) at Week 48. A substudy evaluated bone mineral density, body fat distribution and serum bone turnover markers.
Seven hundred and ninety-seven participants were dosed (maraviroc, n = 396; tenofovir/emtricitabine, n = 401). The Data Monitoring Committee recommended early study termination due to inferior efficacy in the maraviroc group. At Week 48, the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml was 77.3% for maraviroc and 86.8% for tenofovir/emtricitabine [difference of -9.54% (95% confidence interval: -14.83 to -4.24)]. More maraviroc participants discontinued for lack of efficacy, which was not associated with non-R5 tropism or resistance. Discontinuations for adverse events, Category C events, Grade 3/4 adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were similar between groups.
A once-daily nucleos(t)ide-sparing two-drug regimen of maraviroc and darunavir/ritonavir was inferior to a three-drug regimen of tenofovir/emtricitabine and darunavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive adults.
本研究旨在评估马拉维若联合达芦那韦/利托那韦(均为每日一次)用于治疗初治的HIV-1感染个体的疗效。
MODERN研究是一项针对血浆HIV-1 RNA至少为1000拷贝/ml且无研究药物敏感性降低证据的初治HIV-1感染成人的多中心、双盲、非劣效性III期研究。
在筛查时,参与者按1:1随机分组,接受基因型或表型嗜性检测。CCR5嗜性HIV-1感染者按1:1随机分组,接受每日一次150mg马拉维若或每日一次替诺福韦/恩曲他滨,均联合每日一次达芦那韦/利托那韦,疗程96周。主要终点是第48周时HIV-1 RNA低于50拷贝/ml的参与者比例(食品药品监督管理局快照算法)。一项子研究评估了骨矿物质密度、体脂分布和血清骨转换标志物。
797名参与者接受了给药(马拉维若组,n = 396;替诺福韦/恩曲他滨组,n = 401)。数据监测委员会建议提前终止研究,因为马拉维若组疗效较差。在第48周时,HIV-1 RNA低于50拷贝/ml的参与者比例,马拉维若组为77.3%,替诺福韦/恩曲他滨组为86.8%[差异为-9.54%(95%置信区间:-14.83至-4.24)]。更多接受马拉维若治疗的参与者因疗效不佳而停药,这与非R5嗜性或耐药性无关。两组因不良事件、C类事件、3/4级不良事件和实验室异常而停药的情况相似。
在初治成人中,每日一次的马拉维若和达芦那韦/利托那韦的双药核苷类药物保留方案在抗逆转录病毒疗效上不如替诺福韦/恩曲他滨和达芦那韦/利托那韦的三药方案。