Schneider Daniel A, Akhurst Timothy J, Ngan Samuel Y, Warrier Satish K, Michael Michael, Lynch Andrew C, Te Marvelde Luc, Heriot Alexander G
1 Department of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 2 Centre for Molecular Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 4 Department of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 5 Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Mar;59(3):179-86. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000557.
Management of rectal cancer has become multidisciplinary and is driven by the stage of the disease, with increased focus on restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.
The purpose of this study was to assess the relative impact of restaging after preoperative chemoradiation with FDG-PET scan, CT, and MRI in the management of patients with rectal cancer.
This was a retrospective study from a single institution.
This study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center.
A total of 199 patients met the inclusion criteria: patients with rectal adenocarcinoma; staged with positron emission tomography, CT, and MRI; T2 to T4, N0 to N2, M0 to M1; treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation 50.4 Gy and infusional 5-fluorouracil; and restaged 4 weeks after chemoradiation before surgery between 2003 and 2013.
Comparisons of the tumor stage among different imaging modalities before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation were performed. The impact of restaging on the management plan was assessed.
The stage at presentation was T2, 8.04%; T3, 65.33%; T4, 26.63%; N0, 17.09%; N1, 47.74%; N2, 34.67%; M0, 81.91%; and M1, 18.09%. Changes in disease stage postneoadjuvant chemoradiation were observed in 99 patients (50%). The management plans of 29 patients (15%) were changed. The impact of each restaging modality on management for all of the patients was positron emission tomography, 11%; CT, 4%; and MRI, 4%. In patients with metastatic disease at primary staging, the relative impact of each restaging modality in changing management was positron emission tomography, 32%; CT, 18%; and MRI, 6%.
This study was limited by its single-center and retrospective design. Operations were performed 4 weeks after restaging.
Changes in the extent of disease after long-course chemoradiotherapy result in changes of management in a significant percentage of patients. Positron emission tomography has the most significant impact in the change of management overall, and its use in restaging advanced rectal cancer should be further explored.
直肠癌的治疗已变得多学科化,且由疾病分期驱动,对新辅助治疗后直肠癌的再分期关注度日益增加。
本研究旨在评估术前同步放化疗后采用氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)进行再分期对直肠癌患者治疗的相对影响。
这是一项来自单一机构的回顾性研究。
本研究在一家三级癌症中心开展。
共有199例患者符合纳入标准:直肠腺癌患者;通过正电子发射断层扫描、CT和MRI进行分期;T2至T4期,N0至N2期,M0至M1期;接受50.4 Gy新辅助同步放化疗及持续静脉输注5-氟尿嘧啶治疗;于2003年至2013年间在放化疗后4周手术前进行再分期。
对新辅助放化疗前后不同成像方式的肿瘤分期进行比较。评估再分期对治疗方案的影响。
初诊时的分期为T2期,占8.04%;T3期,占65.33%;T4期,占26.63%;N0期,占17.09%;N1期,占47.74%;N2期,占34.67%;M0期,占81.91%;M1期,占18.09%。99例患者(50%)在新辅助放化疗后疾病分期发生了变化。29例患者(15%)的治疗方案发生了改变。每种再分期方式对所有患者治疗的影响为:正电子发射断层扫描,11%;CT,4%;MRI,4%。在初诊时患有转移性疾病的患者中,每种再分期方式在改变治疗方面的相对影响为:正电子发射断层扫描,32%;CT,18%;MRI,6%。
本研究受单中心和回顾性设计的限制。再分期后4周进行手术。
长程同步放化疗后疾病范围的改变导致相当比例的患者治疗方案发生改变。正电子发射断层扫描对总体治疗方案的改变影响最大,其在晚期直肠癌再分期中的应用应进一步探索。