Centre for Pain Medicine, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Neuromodulation. 2016 Jul;19(5):533-40. doi: 10.1111/ner.12391. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
The speed of intrathecal drug administration (slow continuous infusion vs. rapid bolus application) might influence the efficacy of therapy despite the equal daily dose in both administration patterns. We tested this hypothesis in a small prospective single-centre pilot study in a population of chronic pain patients with intrathecal opioid therapy.
Ten patients receiving intrathecal opioids for chronic pain assessed their pain four times daily on a numeric rating scale (NRS), more than the time course of six weeks divided into three blocks of two weeks each: Baseline evaluation (intrathecal pumps with previously established continuous infusion settings), followed by two blinded trial blocks of continuous (same pump parameters as during evaluation) and bolus (40% of daily dose split into four equal boli applied every six hours, with the remaining 60% as background continuous infusion) regimes. Patients were randomized in a crossover fashion.
6/10 patients reported significantly lower NRS-scores during bolus as compared to continuous trial blocks while only one patient showed the opposite effect. Overall, bolus trial blocks were associated with a small but significant reduction of NRS-scores (mean -0.56; p < 0.0001). Side-effects related to bolus infusions were not reported.
Intermittent bolus administration may be helpful for increasing the efficacy of intrathecal opioid therapy of chronic pain.
尽管两种给药方式的日剂量相等,但鞘内药物给药速度(缓慢持续输注与快速推注)可能会影响治疗效果。我们在接受鞘内阿片类药物治疗的慢性疼痛患者的小前瞻性单中心试点研究中检验了这一假设。
10 名接受鞘内阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的患者每天四次使用数字评分量表(NRS)评估疼痛,时间超过六周,分为三个两星期的块:基线评估(使用先前建立的持续输注设置的鞘内泵),随后进行两个盲法试验块的持续(与评估期间相同的泵参数)和推注(每日剂量的 40%分为四个相等的推注,每六小时推注一次,其余 60%作为背景持续输注)。患者以交叉方式随机分组。
6/10 名患者报告在推注试验块期间的 NRS 评分明显低于持续试验块,而只有 1 名患者表现出相反的效果。总体而言,推注试验块与 NRS 评分的轻微但显著降低相关(平均 -0.56;p<0.0001)。未报告与推注输注相关的副作用。
间歇性推注给药可能有助于提高慢性疼痛的鞘内阿片类药物治疗的疗效。