Dalle Ave Anne L, Bernat James L
Ethics Unit, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University Medical Center, Geneva, Switzerland.
Neurology Department, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
J Crit Care. 2016 Jun;33:114-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
The UK, France, and Switzerland determine death using the brain criterion even in organ donation after the circulatory determination of death (DCDD), in which the United States and Canada use the circulatory-respiratory criterion. In our analysis of the scientific validity of the brain criterion in DCDD, we concluded that although it may be attractive in theory because it conceptualizes death as a unitary phenomenon, its use in practice is invalid. The preconditions (ie, the absence of reversible causes, such as toxic or metabolic disorders) for determining brain death cannot be met in DCDD. Thus, although brain death tests prove the cessation of tested brain functions, they do not prove that their cessation is irreversible. A stand-off period of 5 to 10 minutes is insufficient to achieve the irreversibility requirement of brain death. Because circulatory cessation inevitably leads to cessation of brain functions, first permanently and then irreversibly, the use of brain criterion is unnecessary to determine death in DCDD. Expanding brain death to permit it to be satisfied by permanent cessation of brain functions is controversial but has been considered as a possible means to declare death in uncontrolled DCDD.
英国、法国和瑞士即使在循环判定死亡(DCDD)后的器官捐赠中也使用脑死亡标准来判定死亡,而美国和加拿大则使用循环-呼吸标准。在我们对DCDD中脑死亡标准的科学有效性进行分析时,我们得出结论,尽管它在理论上可能具有吸引力,因为它将死亡概念化为一种单一现象,但在实践中的应用是无效的。在DCDD中,无法满足判定脑死亡的前提条件(即不存在可逆原因,如中毒或代谢紊乱)。因此,尽管脑死亡测试证明了所测试的脑功能已经停止,但它们并不能证明这种停止是不可逆的。5到10分钟的间隔期不足以满足脑死亡的不可逆性要求。由于循环停止不可避免地会导致脑功能首先永久停止,然后不可逆地停止,因此在DCDD中使用脑死亡标准来判定死亡是没有必要的。将脑死亡扩展到允许通过脑功能的永久停止来满足脑死亡标准存在争议,但已被视为在非受控DCDD中宣告死亡的一种可能方式。