Mazzoni Agustina, Althabe Fernando, Gutierrez Laura, Gibbons Luz, Liu Nancy H, Bonotti Ana María, Izbizky Gustavo H, Ferrary Marta, Viergue Nora, Vigil Silvia I, Zalazar Denett Gabriela, Belizán José M
Mother and Child's Health Research Department, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Feb 8;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0824-0.
Rates of caesarean section have steadily increased in most middle- and high-income countries over the last few decades without medical justification. Maternal request is one of the frequently cited non-medical factors contributing to this trend. The objectives of this study were to assess pregnant women's preferences regarding mode of delivery and to compare actual caesarean section rates in the public and private sectors.
A prospective cohort study was conducted in two public and three private hospitals in Buenos Aires, Argentina. 382 nulliparous pregnant women (183 from the private sector and 199 from the public sector) aged 18 to 35 years, with single pregnancies over 32 weeks of gestational age were enrolled during antenatal care visits between October 2010 and September 2011. We excluded women with pregnancies resulting from assisted fertility, women with known pre-existing major diseases or, with pregnancy complications, or with a medical indication of elective cesarean section. We used two different approaches to assess women's preferences: a survey using a tailored questionnaire, and a discrete choice experiment.
Only 8 and 6% of the healthy nulliparous women in the public and private sectors, respectively, expressed a preference for caesarean section. Fear of pain and safety were the most frequently expressed reasons for preferring caesarean section. When reasons for delivery mode were assessed by a discrete choice experiment, women placed the most emphasis on sex after childbirth. Of women who expressed their preference for vaginal delivery, 34 and 40% ended their pregnancies by caesarean section in public and private hospitals, respectively.
The preference for caesarean section is low among healthy nulliparous women in Buenos Aires. The reasons why these women had a rate of more than 35% caesarean sections are unlikely related to their preferences for mode of delivery.
在过去几十年里,大多数中高收入国家的剖宫产率在没有医学指征的情况下稳步上升。产妇要求是导致这一趋势的常见非医学因素之一。本研究的目的是评估孕妇对分娩方式的偏好,并比较公立和私立部门的实际剖宫产率。
在阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯的两家公立医院和三家私立医院进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。2010年10月至2011年9月期间,在产前检查时纳入了382名年龄在18至35岁之间、单胎妊娠且孕周超过32周的初产妇(183名来自私立部门,199名来自公立部门)。我们排除了辅助生殖妊娠的妇女、已知患有重大疾病或有妊娠并发症的妇女,或有择期剖宫产医学指征的妇女。我们使用两种不同的方法来评估妇女的偏好:使用定制问卷进行调查和离散选择实验。
公立和私立部门健康初产妇中分别只有8%和6%表示倾向于剖宫产。对疼痛和安全的恐惧是最常被提及的选择剖宫产的原因。当通过离散选择实验评估分娩方式的原因时,女性最看重产后性生活。在表示偏好阴道分娩的女性中,公立和私立医院分别有34%和40%的人以剖宫产结束妊娠。
布宜诺斯艾利斯健康初产妇对剖宫产的偏好较低。这些妇女剖宫产率超过35%的原因不太可能与她们对分娩方式的偏好有关。