• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其对分娩方式和按需剖宫产的态度。

Attitudes towards mode of delivery and cesarean on demand in Turkey.

作者信息

Koken G, Cosar E, Sahin F K, Tolga Arioz D, Duman Z, Aral I

机构信息

Afyon Kocatepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Dec;99(3):233-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.031. Epub 2007 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.031
PMID:17673239
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the attitudes of healthcare providers and the public in Turkey towards mode of delivery and cesarean delivery on demand.

METHODS

A written questionnaire was given to female healthcare providers and women from the general public, and their answers were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 329 female healthcare providers and 347 women from the public group completed the survey. In response, 48.1% of healthcare providers and 69.6% of the public group chose vaginal delivery as the preferred mode of delivery (P<0.001). Some 45.3% of healthcare providers and 20.6% of the public group had undergone a cesarean delivery without any medical indications (P<0.001). In addition, 37.8% of healthcare providers and 36.2% of the public group believed that women should have the right to a cesarean delivery on demand.

CONCLUSIONS

In the two groups studied the preference for cesarean delivery is higher in Turkish healthcare providers than in the public population. In both groups the attitude towards cesarean delivery on demand is high.

摘要

目的

评估土耳其医疗服务提供者和公众对分娩方式及按需剖宫产的态度。

方法

向女性医疗服务提供者和普通公众发放书面问卷,并对答案进行分析。

结果

共有329名女性医疗服务提供者和347名公众完成了调查。结果显示,48.1%的医疗服务提供者和69.6%的公众选择阴道分娩作为首选分娩方式(P<0.001)。约45.3%的医疗服务提供者和20.6%的公众在无任何医学指征的情况下接受了剖宫产(P<0.001)。此外,37.8%的医疗服务提供者和36.2%的公众认为女性应有权按需进行剖宫产。

结论

在所研究的两组人群中,土耳其医疗服务提供者对剖宫产的偏好高于公众。两组对按需剖宫产的态度都较为积极。

相似文献

1
Attitudes towards mode of delivery and cesarean on demand in Turkey.土耳其对分娩方式和按需剖宫产的态度。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Dec;99(3):233-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.031. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
2
Obstetrical providers' preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study.产科医生首选的分娩方式和对非医学指征剖宫产的态度:一项横断面研究。
BJOG. 2018 Sep;125(10):1294-1302. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15122. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
3
Turkish obstetricians' personal preference for mode of delivery and attitude toward cesarean delivery on maternal request.土耳其产科医生对分娩方式的个人偏好和对产妇要求剖宫产的态度。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Sep;284(3):543-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1682-z. Epub 2010 Sep 26.
4
Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?智利女性对分娩方式的偏好:她们更喜欢哪种方式以及原因是什么?
BJOG. 2006 Nov;113(11):1253-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01069.x. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
5
Cesarean section: requested mode of delivery?剖宫产:期望的分娩方式?
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2017;44(1):85-87.
6
Do provider birth attitudes influence cesarean delivery rate: a cross-sectional study.医生的分娩态度是否会影响剖宫产率:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 29;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1756-7.
7
Non-medical determinants of cesarean section in a medically dominated maternity system.在以医学为主导的孕产妇保健体系中剖宫产的非医学决定因素
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Oct;93(10):1025-33. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12466. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
8
Women's attitudes toward mode of delivery in South Korea--a society with high cesarean section rates.韩国女性对分娩方式的态度——一个剖宫产率较高的社会
Birth. 2004 Jun;31(2):108-16. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00288.x.
9
Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system.在剖宫产率高且医疗主导型产科体系的背景下,女性对分娩方式的产前偏好。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Apr;93(4):408-15. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12353.
10
Cesarean by choice? Empirical study of public attitudes.选择性剖宫产?公众态度的实证研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(12):1301-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340802482978.

引用本文的文献

1
Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders.女性选择剖宫产作为分娩方式是她们的决定吗?利益相关者观点的文献综述。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2440-2.
2
Comparison of bilateral transversus abdominis plane block and wound infiltration with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery.剖宫产术后双侧腹横肌平面阻滞与布比卡因伤口浸润用于术后镇痛的比较。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2017 Mar 15;18(1):26-32. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.2016.0155.
3
Women's preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study.
公立医院和私立医院中女性的偏好与分娩方式:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Feb 8;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0824-0.
4
The preference of Iranian women to have normal vaginal or cesarean deliveries.伊朗女性对顺产或剖宫产的偏好。
J Res Med Sci. 2013 Nov;18(11):943-50.
5
Medical students' personal choice for mode of delivery in Santa Catarina, Brazil: a cross-sectional, quantitative study.巴西圣卡塔琳娜州医学生对分娩方式的个人选择:一项横断面、定量研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Jul 20;12:57. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-57.
6
Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.女性对剖宫产的偏好:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2011 Mar;118(4):391-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02793.x. Epub 2010 Dec 7.