Slovarp Laurie, King Lauren, Off Catherine, Liss Julie
Communicative Sciences and Disorders, The University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT, 59812-9968, USA.
Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Ave, P.O. Box 870102, Tempe, AZ, 85287-0102, USA.
Dysphagia. 2016 Jun;31(3):416-23. doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9693-y. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
This pilot study investigated the tongue pull-back (TPB) exercise to improve tongue-base retraction as well as two methods to add resistance to the TPB. Surface electromyography (sEMG) to the submental triangle was used as an indication of tongue-base activity on 13 healthy adults during: (1) saliva swallow, (2) 15 mL water swallow, (3) effortful swallow, (4) unassisted TPB, (5) TPB with added resistance by holding the tongue with gauze (finger-resisted TPB), and (6) TPB with the tongue clipped to a spring-loaded tension resistance device (device-resisted TPB). Order of the exercises was randomized. The exercises fell into two groups-weak and intense. Weak exercises included saliva swallow, water swallow, and unassisted TPB (mean sEMG = 19.07 μV, p = .593). Intense exercises included effortful swallow, finger-resisted TPB, and device-resisted TPB (mean sEMG = 36.44 μV, p = .315). Each intense exercise resulted in significantly higher mean sEMG peak amplitude than each weak exercise (p < .05), with one exception; the effortful swallow was not significantly different than the unassisted TPB (p = .171). This study provides preliminary evidence that the unassisted TPB may not be any more helpful for improving tongue-base retraction than normal swallowing. Adding resistance to the TPB by holding the tongue with gauze may be an effective alternative. This study also demonstrates proof-of-concept for creating a device to attach to the tongue and provide tension resistance during the TPB exercise. Further research with a more sophisticated design is needed before such a device can be fully developed and implemented clinically.
这项初步研究调查了舌后缩(TPB)练习对改善舌根后缩的作用,以及两种增加TPB阻力的方法。对13名健康成年人进行颏下三角表面肌电图(sEMG)检查,以作为舌根活动的指标,检查期间包括:(1)唾液吞咽,(2)15毫升水吞咽,(3)用力吞咽,(4)无辅助TPB,(5)用纱布固定舌头增加阻力的TPB(手指辅助TPB),以及(6)将舌头夹在弹簧加载张力阻力装置上的TPB(装置辅助TPB)。练习顺序是随机的。这些练习分为两组——弱强度和高强度。弱强度练习包括唾液吞咽、水吞咽和无辅助TPB(平均sEMG = 19.07 μV,p = 0.593)。高强度练习包括用力吞咽、手指辅助TPB和装置辅助TPB(平均sEMG = 36.44 μV,p = 0.315)。除一项例外,每项高强度练习的平均sEMG峰值幅度均显著高于每项弱强度练习(p < 0.05);用力吞咽与无辅助TPB无显著差异(p = 0.171)。本研究提供了初步证据,表明无辅助TPB对改善舌根后缩可能并不比正常吞咽更有帮助。用纱布固定舌头增加TPB的阻力可能是一种有效的替代方法。本研究还证明了设计一种装置连接到舌头并在TPB练习期间提供张力阻力的概念验证。在这种装置能够完全开发并临床应用之前,需要进行更复杂设计的进一步研究。