• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫苗接种计划的社会价值:超越成本效益

The Social Value Of Vaccination Programs: Beyond Cost-Effectiveness.

作者信息

Luyten Jeroen, Beutels Philippe

机构信息

Jeroen Luyten (

Philippe Beutels is a professor at the Centre for Health Economics Research and Modeling Infectious Diseases at the University of Antwerp, in Belgium.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Feb;35(2):212-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1088.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1088
PMID:26858372
Abstract

In the current global environment of increased strain on health care budgets, all medical interventions have to compete for funding. Cost-effectiveness analysis has become a standard method to use in estimating how much value an intervention offers relative to its costs, and it has become an influential element in decision making. However, the application of cost-effectiveness analysis to vaccination programs fails to capture the full contribution such a program offers to the community. Recent literature has highlighted how cost-effectiveness analysis can neglect the broader economic impact of vaccines. In this article we also argue that socioethical contributions such as effects on health equity, sustaining the public good of herd immunity, and social integration of minority groups are neglected in cost-effectiveness analysis. Evaluations of vaccination programs require broad and multidimensional perspectives that can account for their social, ethical, and economic impact as well as their cost-effectiveness.

摘要

在当前全球医疗保健预算压力增大的环境下,所有医疗干预措施都必须竞争资金。成本效益分析已成为一种标准方法,用于估计一项干预措施相对于其成本所提供的价值,并且它已成为决策中的一个有影响力的因素。然而,将成本效益分析应用于疫苗接种计划未能充分体现该计划对社区的全部贡献。最近的文献强调了成本效益分析如何可能忽略疫苗更广泛的经济影响。在本文中,我们还认为,诸如对健康公平性的影响、维持群体免疫的公共利益以及少数群体的社会融合等社会伦理贡献在成本效益分析中被忽视了。对疫苗接种计划的评估需要广泛和多维度的视角,以考虑其社会、伦理和经济影响以及成本效益。

相似文献

1
The Social Value Of Vaccination Programs: Beyond Cost-Effectiveness.疫苗接种计划的社会价值:超越成本效益
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Feb;35(2):212-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1088.
2
When Not All That Counts Can Be Counted: Economic Evaluations And The Value Of Vaccination.当并非所有重要的东西都能被量化时:经济评估与疫苗接种的价值
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Feb;35(2):208-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1438.
3
A novel method to value real options in health care: the case of a multicohort human papillomavirus vaccination strategy.一种评估医疗保健中实物期权价值的新方法:多队列人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种策略案例。
Clin Ther. 2013 Jul;35(7):904-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
4
Mind the gaps: what's missing from current economic evaluations of universal HPV vaccination?留意差距:当前人乳头瘤病毒普遍接种的经济评估中缺少了什么?
Vaccine. 2014 Jun 24;32(30):3732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 May 15.
5
Cost effectiveness of adding 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate (PCV-7) vaccine to the Norwegian childhood vaccination program.在挪威儿童疫苗接种计划中添加7价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV - 7)的成本效益。
Vaccine. 2006 Jul 17;24(29-30):5690-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.04.042. Epub 2006 May 5.
6
Valuing vaccines: deficiencies and remedies.重视疫苗:缺陷与补救措施
Vaccine. 2015 Jun 8;33 Suppl 2:B29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.03.023.
7
[Clinical effectiveness and economical evaluation of preventive vaccination].预防性疫苗的临床效果与经济学评估
Acta Med Port. 2011 Jul-Aug;24(4):565-86. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
8
The economics of routine childhood hepatitis A immunization in the United States: the impact of herd immunity.美国儿童常规甲肝疫苗接种的经济学:群体免疫的影响
Pediatrics. 2007 Jan;119(1):e22-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1572.
9
Costs of diarrheal disease and the cost-effectiveness of a rotavirus vaccination program in kyrgyzstan.吉尔吉斯斯坦腹泻病的成本及轮状病毒疫苗接种计划的成本效益
J Infect Dis. 2009 Nov 1;200 Suppl 1:S195-202. doi: 10.1086/605040.
10
Health economic research on vaccinations and immunisation practices--an introductory primer.疫苗接种与免疫实践的卫生经济学研究——入门指南。
Vaccine. 2005 Mar 18;23(17-18):2095-103. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.064.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in routine childhood immunization uptake between single and multiple healthcare facility use: the Kochi Adjunct Study of Japan Environment and Children's Study.单次和多次使用医疗机构情况下儿童常规免疫接种率的差异:日本环境与儿童研究的高知辅助研究
Environ Health Prev Med. 2025;30:51. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.25-00028.
2
Strategies to accelerate cervical cancer elimination in Greece: a modeling study.希腊加速消除宫颈癌的策略:一项建模研究
Front Oncol. 2025 May 27;15:1480942. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1480942. eCollection 2025.
3
The Relationship Between Illusory Health Beliefs, Recommended Health Behaviours, and Complementary and Alternative Medicine: An Investigation Across Multiple Time Points.
虚幻健康信念、推荐健康行为与补充和替代医学之间的关系:跨多个时间点的调查
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 1;15(5):614. doi: 10.3390/bs15050614.
4
The impact of quality-adjusted life years on evaluating COVID-19 mitigation strategies: lessons from age-specific vaccination roll-out and variants of concern in Belgium (2020-2022).质量调整生命年对评估 COVID-19 缓解策略的影响:比利时特定年龄组疫苗接种开展和关注变异株的经验教训(2020-2022 年)。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):1171. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18576-w.
5
Exploring trends and determinants of basic childhood vaccination coverage: Empirical evidence over 41 years.探索基础儿童疫苗接种覆盖率的趋势和决定因素:41 年来的实证证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 21;19(3):e0300404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300404. eCollection 2024.
6
Improved vaccine coverage for First Nations children receiving first dose on-reserve: a retrospective cohort study in western Canada.提高在保留地接受第一剂疫苗的第一民族儿童的疫苗接种率:加拿大西部的一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Dec 12;8(12):e013261. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013261.
7
Sociodemographic and socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Belgium: a nationwide record linkage study.比利时新冠疫苗接种中的社会人口学和社会经济差异:一项全国性记录关联研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023 Dec 26;78(3):176-83. doi: 10.1136/jech-2023-220751.
8
Vaccine pricing strategies in China.中国的疫苗定价策略。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jul;8(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011405.
9
Return on Investment (ROI) of Three Vaccination Programmes in Italy: HPV at 12 Years, Herpes Zoster in Adults, and Influenza in the Elderly.意大利三种疫苗接种计划的投资回报率:12岁人群的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗、成人带状疱疹疫苗和老年人流感疫苗
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Apr 30;11(5):924. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11050924.
10
[Health Technology Assessment: a value-based tool for the evaluation of healthcare technologies. Reassessment of the cell-culture-derived quadrivalent influenza vaccine: Flucelvax Tetra 2.0].[卫生技术评估:一种基于价值的医疗技术评估工具。细胞培养衍生四价流感疫苗Flucelvax Tetra 2.0的重新评估]
J Prev Med Hyg. 2023 Mar 2;63(4 Suppl 1):E1-E140. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.4s1. eCollection 2022 Dec.