• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin therapy versus intravenous ceftazidime therapy for selected bacterial infections.

作者信息

Gaut P L, Carron W C, Ching W T, Meyer R D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center/University of California-Los Angeles School of Medicine 90048.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):169S-175S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90051-x.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(89)90051-x
PMID:2686417
Abstract

The efficacy and toxicity of sequential intravenous and oral ciprofloxacin therapy was compared with intravenously administered ceftazidime in a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-blinded trial. Thirty-two patients (16 patients receiving ciprofloxacin and 16 patients receiving ceftazidime) with 38 infections caused by susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa, enteric gram-negative rods, Salmonella group B, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas cepacia, and Xanthomonas maltophilia at various sites were evaluable for determination of efficacy. Length of therapy varied from seven to 25 days. Concomitant antimicrobials included intravenously administered beta-lactams for gram-positive organisms, intravenous/oral metronidazole and clindamycin for anaerobes, and intravenous/local amphotericin B for Candida albicans. Intravenous administration of 200 mg ciprofloxacin every 12 hours to 11 patients produced peak serum levels between 1.15 and 3.12 micrograms/ml; trough levels ranged between 0.08 and 0.86 micrograms/ml. Overall response rates were similar for patients receiving ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime. Emergence of resistance was similar in both groups--one Enterobacter cloacae and two P. aeruginosa became resistant after ciprofloxacin therapy and two P. aeruginosa became resistant after ceftazidime therapy. The frequency of superinfection with a variety of organisms was also similar in both groups. Adverse events related to ciprofloxacin included transient pruritus at the infusion site and generalized rash leading to drug discontinuation (one patient each), and with ceftazidime adverse effects included pain at the site of infusion and the development of allergic interstitial nephritis (one patient each). Overall, intravenous/oral ciprofloxin therapy appears to be as safe and effective as intravenous ceftazidime therapy in the treatment of a variety of infections due to susceptible aerobic gram-negative organisms.

摘要

相似文献

1
Intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin therapy versus intravenous ceftazidime therapy for selected bacterial infections.
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):169S-175S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90051-x.
2
Prospective, randomized comparison of sequential intravenous followed by oral ciprofloxacin with intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of serious infections.
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):185S-190S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90055-7.
3
Intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin versus ceftazidime in the treatment of serious infections.
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):164S-168S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90050-8.
4
Ciprofloxacin (intravenous/oral) versus ceftazidime in lower respiratory tract infections.
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):113S-115S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90036-3.
5
Intravenous ciprofloxacin or ceftazidime in selected infections. A prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):191S-194S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90056-9.
6
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravenous ciprofloxacin and intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of selected infections.
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):176S-180S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90052-1.
7
Randomized, double-blind comparative study of intravenous ciprofloxacin versus ceftazidime in the treatment of serious infections.
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):160S-163S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90049-1.
8
Intravenous ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime in serious infections. A prospective, controlled clinical trial with third-party blinding.
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):202S-205S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90059-4.
9
Efficacy and safety of intravenous ciprofloxacin in the treatment of serious infections. A comparison with ceftazidime.
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):198S-201S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90058-2.
10
Intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin versus intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of serious gram-negative infections of the skin and skin structure.
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):132S-135S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90042-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Sequential antibiotic therapy: Effective cost management and patient care.序贯抗生素治疗:有效的成本管理与患者护理。
Can J Infect Dis. 1995 Nov;6(6):306-15. doi: 10.1155/1995/165848.
2
Modes of administration of antibiotics for symptomatic severe urinary tract infections.用于有症状的严重尿路感染的抗生素给药方式。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD003237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003237.pub2.
3
Do we need an intravenous fluoroquinolone?我们需要静脉注射氟喹诺酮类药物吗?
West J Med. 1992 Jul;157(1):55-9.