• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在日常临床实践中,基于血流储备分数指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗稳定型冠状动脉疾病的长期预后:倾向评分匹配的里程碑分析。

Long-term outcome of FFR-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease in daily clinical practice: a propensity score-matched landmark analysis.

机构信息

The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2016 Feb;11(11):e1257-66. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I11A247.

DOI:10.4244/EIJV11I11A247
PMID:26865443
Abstract

AIMS

Our aim was to investigate the strength of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in daily practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

For this study, 3,512 patients with stable CAD and at least one 50-89% coronary stenosis were identified; those patients thought to require PCI (n=1,716) were selected. Of these, 962 (56%) were treated based on angiography (XA) alone, whereas 754 patients (44%) had an FFR-guided treatment. In the latter group, 321 patients (43%) were reallocated to another treatment, predominantly medical treatment. After propensity score matching, the number of indicated lesions was 957 in the XA-guided group and 947 in the FFR-guided group. FFR guidance resulted in PCI deferral in 462 lesions (48.8%). In a seven-day landmark analysis, the rate of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) was less than half in the FFR-guided group (p>0.05). For the eight-day to four-year follow-up period, FFR guidance resulted in a significantly lower rate of the combined endpoint of death/MI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63) and MI-driven target lesion revascularisation (HR 0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

This large, retrospective study shows that performing FFR has a significant impact on therapeutic strategy and demonstrates the favourable long-term outcome of FFR-guided PCI in an "all-comers" population of patients with stable CAD in daily clinical practice.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在日常临床实践中,基于冠状动脉血流储备分数(FFR)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)中的作用。

方法和结果

本研究纳入了 3512 例稳定性 CAD 且至少存在一处 50%-89%狭窄的患者,选择了其中需要进行 PCI 的患者(n=1716)。在这些患者中,有 962 例(56%)仅接受了血管造影(XA)指导的治疗,而 754 例(44%)患者接受了 FFR 指导的治疗。在后者组中,有 321 例(43%)患者重新分配到另一种治疗方法,主要是药物治疗。经过倾向评分匹配后,XA 指导组和 FFR 指导组的病变数量分别为 957 个和 947 个。FFR 指导使 462 个病变的 PCI 延迟(48.8%)。在 7 天的时间点分析中,FFR 指导组的围手术期心肌梗死(MI)发生率低于一半(p>0.05)。在 8 天至 4 年的随访期间,FFR 指导与死亡/MI 复合终点发生率显著降低相关(风险比[HR] 0.63)和 MI 驱动的靶病变血运重建(HR 0.35)。

结论

这项大型回顾性研究表明,FFR 检测对治疗策略有显著影响,并证明了在日常临床实践中,在稳定性 CAD 的“所有患者”中,FFR 指导的 PCI 具有良好的长期预后。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcome of FFR-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease in daily clinical practice: a propensity score-matched landmark analysis.在日常临床实践中,基于血流储备分数指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗稳定型冠状动脉疾病的长期预后:倾向评分匹配的里程碑分析。
EuroIntervention. 2016 Feb;11(11):e1257-66. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I11A247.
2
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.多支血管病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中血流储备分数与血管造影的比较:多支血管评估血流储备分数与血管造影(FAME)研究的 2 年随访。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 May 28.
3
Long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice.在当代实践中,基于血流储备分数指导的与基于血管造影指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期结果。
Eur Heart J. 2013 May;34(18):1375-83. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht005. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
4
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.多支冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中血流储备分数与血管造影指导的比较(FAME):一项随机对照试验的 5 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2015 Nov 7;386(10006):1853-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00057-4. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
5
The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy.年龄对血流储备分数指导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响:FAME(血流储备分数与血管造影术用于多支血管评估)试验的一项子研究
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 15;177(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
6
Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with small-vessel disease.小血管病变患者经分数血流储备指导的经皮冠状动脉血运重建术的长期临床结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb 1;5(1):62-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.966937. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
7
Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve- versus angio-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with intermediate stenosis of coronary artery bypass grafts.冠状动脉旁路移植术中中度狭窄患者的血流储备分数指导与血管造影指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期临床结局。
Am Heart J. 2013 Jul;166(1):110-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 16.
8
Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在中间型冠状动脉疾病中的疗效:血流储备分数指导与血管内超声指导。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug;3(8):812-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.016.
9
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography-guided strategy in acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a randomized trial.分数血流储备与血管造影引导策略在多支血管病变急性心肌梗死中的应用:一项随机试验。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Feb 7;44(6):473-484. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac763.
10
The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on fractional flow reserve: Insights from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial.左心室射血分数对血流储备分数的影响:来自FAME(血流储备分数与血管造影术用于多支血管评估)试验的见解。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 1;204:206-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.169. Epub 2015 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of the Feasibility of Myocardial Blood Flow Index Versus CT-FFR in the Diagnosis of Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.心肌血流指数与CT-FFR在疑似冠状动脉疾病诊断中的可行性比较分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 12;25(8):284. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2508284. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Coronary Revascularization: Evidence from Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies.血流储备分数指导的冠状动脉血运重建:来自随机和非随机研究的证据。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 1;12(11):2659. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112659.
3
Coronary Assessment and Revascularization Before Transcutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation: An Update on Current Knowledge.
经皮主动脉瓣植入术前的冠状动脉评估与血运重建:当前知识更新
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 May 21;8:654892. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.654892. eCollection 2021.
4
One-year clinical outcome of angiography, fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.血管造影、血流储备分数和瞬时无波比值引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的一年临床结局:一项符合PRISMA标准的荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Mar;17(3):1939-1951. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7156. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
5
Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of FFR Compared with Angiography in Multivessel Disease Patient.多支血管病变患者中血流储备分数(FFR)与血管造影比较的临床结局和成本效益分析。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019 Jan;112(1):40-47. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180262. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
6
Impact of spatial characteristics in the left stenotic coronary artery on the hemodynamics and visualization of 3D replica models.左冠状动脉狭窄处空间特征对血流动力学及三维复制模型可视化的影响
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 13;7(1):15452. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15620-1.
7
Hemodynamics analysis of the serial stenotic coronary arteries.串联狭窄冠状动脉的血液动力学分析。
Biomed Eng Online. 2017 Nov 9;16(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12938-017-0413-0.