Suppr超能文献

简要报告:2009 年至 2014 年美国类风湿关节炎患者在使用非生物性疾病修正抗风湿药物治疗后的强化三联治疗。

Brief Report: Intensification to Triple Therapy After Treatment With Nonbiologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United States From 2009 to 2014.

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

CVS Health, Woonsocket, Rhode Island.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jul;68(7):1588-95. doi: 10.1002/art.39617.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Several trials suggest that triple therapy (methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine) and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have similar efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study was undertaken to investigate intensification to triple therapy after initial nonbiologic prescription among patients with RA.

METHODS

The use of triple therapy among patients with RA in 2009-2014 was evaluated using US insurance claims data. Patients with a health care visit for RA and an initial nonbiologic DMARD prescription were included. Frequencies of intensification to triple therapy or a biologic DMARD and rates of intensification per 6-month time period were calculated. Using Cox regression, we evaluated whether sociodemographic, temporal, geographic, clinical, and health care utilization factors were associated with intensification to triple therapy. Among those patients whose therapy was intensified, we investigated factors associated with triple therapy use by logistic regression. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for intensification to triple therapy in relation to various clinical and demographic factors were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 24,576 patients with a mean ± SD age of 50.3 ± 12.3 years, and 78% were female. During the study period, treatment was intensified to biologic DMARDs in 2,739 patients (11.1%) compared to 181 patients (0.7%) whose treatment was intensified to triple therapy. There was no significant change in triple therapy use across calendar years. Patients whose treatment was intensified to triple therapy were more likely to receive glucocorticoids (HR 1.91 [95% CI 1.41-2.60]) compared to patients who did not use glucocorticoids and were more likely to use nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.10-1.99 versus no NSAID use). Among those patients whose treatment was intensified to triple therapy or biologic DMARDs, factors significantly associated with triple therapy use included older age, US region (with the highest odds for triple therapy use in the West and lowest odds for triple therapy use in the Northeast), glucocorticoid use, and lower number of outpatient visits within 180 days of initial nonbiologic DMARD prescription.

CONCLUSION

Despite reports published during the study period suggesting equivalent efficacy of triple therapy and biologic DMARDs for RA, the use of triple therapy was infrequent and did not increase over time in this large nationwide study.

摘要

目的

几项试验表明,在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中,三联疗法(甲氨蝶呤、柳氮磺胺吡啶和羟氯喹)和生物改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)的疗效相似。本研究旨在探讨 RA 患者初始非生物制剂处方后强化三联疗法的情况。

方法

使用美国保险索赔数据评估 2009-2014 年 RA 患者中三联疗法的使用情况。纳入有 RA 就诊和初始非生物 DMARD 处方的患者。计算强化三联疗法或生物 DMARD 的频率和每 6 个月强化率。使用 Cox 回归评估社会人口统计学、时间、地理、临床和医疗保健利用因素是否与强化三联疗法相关。在那些治疗得到强化的患者中,我们通过 logistic 回归调查了与三联疗法使用相关的因素。计算了与各种临床和人口统计学因素相关的强化三联疗法的风险比(HR)及其 95%置信区间(95%CI)。

结果

共纳入 24576 例患者,平均年龄为 50.3±12.3 岁,78%为女性。在研究期间,与 181 例(0.7%)治疗强化为三联疗法的患者相比,2739 例(11.1%)患者的治疗强化为生物 DMARDs。糖皮质激素(HR 1.91[95%CI 1.41-2.60]),更有可能使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)(HR 1.48,95%CI 1.10-1.99 与未使用 NSAIDs 相比)。在那些治疗强化为三联疗法或生物 DMARDs 的患者中,与三联疗法使用显著相关的因素包括年龄较大、美国地区(西部地区使用三联疗法的可能性最高,东北部地区使用三联疗法的可能性最低)、糖皮质激素的使用以及初始非生物 DMARD 处方后 180 天内门诊就诊次数较少。

结论

尽管研究期间发表的报告表明三联疗法和生物 DMARDs 对 RA 的疗效相当,但在这项大型全国性研究中,三联疗法的使用频率较低,且并未随着时间的推移而增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验