Suppr超能文献

分居后的婚姻暴力与共同养育质量

Marital violence and coparenting quality after separation.

作者信息

Hardesty Jennifer L, Crossman Kimberly A, Khaw Lyndal, Raffaelli Marcela

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Southern Illinois University.

出版信息

J Fam Psychol. 2016 Apr;30(3):320-30. doi: 10.1037/fam0000132. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

Abstract

Research has identified multiple predictors of coparenting quality, but few studies have investigated how intimate partner violence (IPV) affects divorcing couples' coparenting relationships. We addressed this question in a sample of 154 mothers with different marital IPV experiences. Mothers were recruited within 4 months of a divorce filing and completed two interviews 3 months apart. At Time 1, mothers reported on violence and coercive control during marriage, and postseparation behavioral (e.g., parental communication), emotional (e.g., anger), and intrusion (e.g., harassment) dynamics; at Time 2, they reported on coparenting quality (i.e., levels of support and conflict). In the overall sample, divorce and violence variables independently predicted coparenting quality. Mothers were then classified into three groups: no violence (NV; n = 74), situational couple violence (SCV; n = 46), or coercive controlling violence (CCV; n = 34). Of the 3, coparenting quality was lowest in the CCV group. While the SCV group was similar to the NV group on most divorce-related variables, the CCV group reported more hostility at separation and placed less importance on father-child relationships. Finally, patterns of association between study variables and coparenting quality showed some parallels between the SCV and NV groups. For CCV, postseparation harassment and fear were negatively associated with coparenting quality. Findings contribute to understanding predictors of coparenting quality and support the need for individualized assessments of divorce cases with attention to IPV dynamics.

摘要

研究已经确定了共同养育质量的多个预测因素,但很少有研究调查亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)如何影响正在离婚的夫妻的共同养育关系。我们在154名有不同婚姻IPV经历的母亲样本中解决了这个问题。母亲们在提交离婚申请后的4个月内被招募,并在相隔3个月的时间里完成了两次访谈。在时间1,母亲们报告了婚姻期间的暴力和强制控制,以及分居后的行为(如亲子沟通)、情绪(如愤怒)和侵扰(如骚扰)动态;在时间2,她们报告了共同养育质量(即支持和冲突水平)。在整个样本中,离婚和暴力变量独立预测了共同养育质量。然后,母亲们被分为三组:无暴力(NV;n = 74)、情境性夫妻暴力(SCV;n = 46)或强制控制暴力(CCV;n = 34)。在这三组中,CCV组的共同养育质量最低。虽然SCV组在大多数与离婚相关的变量上与NV组相似,但CCV组报告说分居时敌意更多,对父子关系的重视程度更低。最后,研究变量与共同养育质量之间的关联模式显示,SCV组和NV组之间存在一些相似之处。对于CCV组来说,分居后的骚扰和恐惧与共同养育质量呈负相关。研究结果有助于理解共同养育质量的预测因素,并支持对离婚案件进行个性化评估的必要性,同时要关注IPV动态。

相似文献

1
Marital violence and coparenting quality after separation.
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Apr;30(3):320-30. doi: 10.1037/fam0000132. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
3
"He Could Scare Me Without Laying a Hand on Me": Mothers' Experiences of Nonviolent Coercive Control During Marriage and After Separation.
Violence Against Women. 2016 Mar;22(4):454-73. doi: 10.1177/1077801215604744. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
4
Exploring Variations Within Situational Couple Violence and Comparisons With Coercive Controlling Violence and No Violence/No Control.
Violence Against Women. 2016 Feb;22(2):206-24. doi: 10.1177/1077801215599842. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
5
Predictors of supportive coparenting after relationship dissolution among at-risk parents.
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Jun;25(3):356-65. doi: 10.1037/a0023652.
7
Parenting and women arrested for intimate partner violence.
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Aug;25(8):1429-48. doi: 10.1177/0886260509346064. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
9
Factors that contribute to the improvement in maternal parenting after separation from a violent husband or partner.
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Jan;27(2):380-95. doi: 10.1177/0886260511416464. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Post-separation abuse: A concept analysis.
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Apr;79(4):1225-1246. doi: 10.1111/jan.15310. Epub 2022 May 27.
2
Intimate Partner Violence and Child Custody Evaluation: A Model for Preliminary Clinical Intervention.
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 17;9:1471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01471. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward a Standard Approach to Operationalizing Coercive Control and Classifying Violence Types.
J Marriage Fam. 2015 Aug;77(4):833-843. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12201.
2
Exploring Variations Within Situational Couple Violence and Comparisons With Coercive Controlling Violence and No Violence/No Control.
Violence Against Women. 2016 Feb;22(2):206-24. doi: 10.1177/1077801215599842. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
3
Perceptions of boundary ambiguity in the process of leaving an abusive partner.
Fam Process. 2015 Jun;54(2):327-43. doi: 10.1111/famp.12104. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
4
The mental health of mothers in and after violent and controlling unions.
Soc Sci Res. 2010 Nov;39(6):925-937. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.06.013.
5
When does intimate partner violence continue after separation?
Violence Against Women. 2013 May;19(5):617-33. doi: 10.1177/1077801213490560. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
6
Suicidal behavior among low-income, African American female victims of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence.
J Interpers Violence. 2011 Sep;26(13):2568-91. doi: 10.1177/0886260510388280. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
7
Processes linking adolescent well-being, marital love, and coparenting.
J Fam Psychol. 2007 Dec;21(4):645-54. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.645.
10
Child custody and visitation decisions when the father has perpetrated violence against the mother.
Violence Against Women. 2005 Aug;11(8):1076-107. doi: 10.1177/1077801205278046.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验