• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国企业平均燃油经济性政策和温室气体排放标准下,替代燃料汽车的采用增加了车队的汽油消耗和温室气体排放。

Alternative Fuel Vehicle Adoption Increases Fleet Gasoline Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under United States Corporate Average Fuel Economy Policy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards.

机构信息

Carnegie Mellon University , 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Mar 1;50(5):2165-74. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02842. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.5b02842
PMID:26867100
Abstract

The United States Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission standards are designed to reduce petroleum consumption and GHG emissions from light-duty passenger vehicles. They do so by requiring automakers to meet aggregate criteria for fleet fuel efficiency and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission rates. Several incentives for manufacturers to sell alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) have been introduced in recent updates of CAFE/GHG policy for vehicles sold from 2012 through 2025 to help encourage a fleet technology transition. These incentives allow automakers that sell AFVs to meet less-stringent fleet efficiency targets, resulting in increased fleet-wide gasoline consumption and emissions. We derive a closed-form expression to quantify these effects. We find that each time an AFV is sold in place of a conventional vehicle, fleet emissions increase by 0 to 60 t of CO2 and gasoline consumption increases by 0 to 7000 gallons (26,000 L), depending on the AFV and year of sale. Using projections for vehicles sold from 2012 to 2025 from the Energy Information Administration, we estimate that the CAFE/GHG AFV incentives lead to a cumulative increase of 30 to 70 million metric tons of CO2 and 3 to 8 billion gallons (11 to 30 billion liters) of gasoline consumed over the vehicles' lifetimes - the largest share of which is due to legacy GHG flex-fuel vehicle credits that expire in 2016. These effects may be 30-40% larger in practice than we estimate here due to optimistic laboratory vehicle efficiency tests used in policy compliance calculations.

摘要

美国公司平均燃油经济性 (CAFE) 标准和温室气体 (GHG) 排放标准旨在减少轻型乘用车的石油消耗和 GHG 排放。它们通过要求汽车制造商满足车队燃油效率和二氧化碳 (CO2) 排放率的综合标准来实现这一目标。最近对 2012 年至 2025 年销售的车辆的 CAFE/GHG 政策进行了更新,引入了几项鼓励制造商销售替代燃料车辆 (AFV) 的激励措施,以帮助鼓励车队技术转型。这些激励措施允许销售 AFV 的汽车制造商达到不那么严格的车队效率目标,从而导致车队范围内的汽油消耗和排放增加。我们推导出一个封闭形式的表达式来量化这些影响。我们发现,每次用传统车辆替代 AFV 销售时,车队排放会增加 0 到 60 公吨的 CO2,汽油消耗会增加 0 到 7000 加仑(26000 升),具体取决于 AFV 和销售年份。根据能源信息署对 2012 年至 2025 年销售车辆的预测,我们估计 CAFE/GHG AFV 激励措施导致在车辆使用寿命内累计增加 30 至 7000 万吨 CO2 和 3 至 80 亿加仑(11 至 300 亿升)的汽油消耗 - 其中最大份额是由于 2016 年到期的遗留 GHG 灵活燃料车辆信用额度。由于政策合规计算中使用的乐观实验室车辆效率测试,这些影响在实践中可能比我们在这里估计的要大 30-40%。

相似文献

1
Alternative Fuel Vehicle Adoption Increases Fleet Gasoline Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under United States Corporate Average Fuel Economy Policy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards.在美国企业平均燃油经济性政策和温室气体排放标准下,替代燃料汽车的采用增加了车队的汽油消耗和温室气体排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Mar 1;50(5):2165-74. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02842. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
2
A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels.替代汽车燃料的生命周期比较。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Oct;50(10):1769-79.
3
Current and Future United States Light-Duty Vehicle Pathways: Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Assessment.当前和未来美国轻型车的发展路径:从摇篮到坟墓全生命周期温室气体排放和经济评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Feb 20;52(4):2392-2399. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06006. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
Comparison of Gasoline Direct-Injection (GDI) and Port Fuel Injection (PFI) Vehicle Emissions: Emission Certification Standards, Cold-Start, Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Potential, and Potential Climate Impacts.比较汽油直喷(GDI)和进气道燃油喷射(PFI)车辆排放:排放认证标准、冷启动、二次有机气溶胶形成潜力以及潜在气候影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Jun 6;51(11):6542-6552. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06509. Epub 2017 May 9.
5
Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.2018 年至 2030 年美国电动汽车与燃油汽车的全生命周期温室气体排放对比。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 15;308:114592. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114592. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
6
Greenhouse Gas and Noxious Emissions from Dual Fuel Diesel and Natural Gas Heavy Goods Vehicles.双燃料柴油和天然气重型货车的温室气体和有害排放物。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Feb 16;50(4):2018-26. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04240. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
7
Economic and environmental benefits of higher-octane gasoline.高辛烷值汽油的经济和环境效益。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jun 17;48(12):6561-8. doi: 10.1021/es405557p. Epub 2014 May 28.
8
A Life-Cycle Comparison of Alternative Automobile Fuels.替代汽车燃料的生命周期比较
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Oct;50(10):1769-1779. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464209.
9
The Effect of Compression Ratio, Fuel Octane Rating, and Ethanol Content on Spark-Ignition Engine Efficiency.压缩比、燃料辛烷值和乙醇含量对火花点火发动机效率的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Sep 15;49(18):10778-89. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01420. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
10
Fuel consumption, emissions estimation, and emissions cost estimates using global positioning data.利用全球定位数据进行燃料消耗、排放估算及排放成本估算。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007 Mar;57(3):348-54. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2007.10465328.

引用本文的文献

1
Cleaning up while Changing Gears: The Role of Battery Design, Fossil Fuel Power Plants, and Vehicle Policy for Reducing Emissions in the Transition to Electric Vehicles.在换挡的同时进行清洁:电池设计、火力发电厂和车辆政策在向电动汽车过渡过程中减少排放的作用。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Feb 27;58(8):3787-3799. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c07098. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
2
Greenhouse gas consequences of the China dual credit policy.中国双积分政策的温室气体影响
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 15;11(1):5212. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19036-w.