• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢羟氨苄与阿莫西林治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的随机、前瞻性、单盲对照研究

A randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of cefadroxil and amoxycillin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

作者信息

Bint A J, Cefai C, McGhie D, Perera B S

出版信息

Br J Clin Pract. 1989 Jan;43(1):19-23.

PMID:2686741
Abstract

Cefadroxil 1 g twice daily and amoxycillin 500 mg three times a day were compared in 111 patients suffering from acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Treatment was for seven days. Excellent or good clinical responses were found in 85 per cent of cases receiving cefadroxil and 81 per cent of patients taking amoxycillin. However, residual symptoms of cough and rhonchi were present to a statistically significantly greater extent in the amoxycillin group. Tolerance of both drugs was good with mild to moderate side effects reported in seven of 54 patients in the cefadroxil group and six of 56 patients taking amoxycillin. Severe nausea and vomiting in two cases in the amoxycillin group resulted in discontinuation of therapy. Microbiological examination of sputum samples showed pathogenic bacteria in 16 per cent, principally Haemophilus influenzae. Amoxycillin 500 mg tds and cefadroxil 1 g bd were equally effective in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

摘要

对111例慢性支气管炎急性加重期患者比较了头孢羟氨苄每日2次、每次1g与阿莫西林每日3次、每次500mg的疗效。疗程为7天。接受头孢羟氨苄治疗的患者中85%以及服用阿莫西林的患者中81%获得了优秀或良好的临床反应。然而,阿莫西林组咳嗽和干啰音等残留症状在统计学上显著更严重。两种药物的耐受性均良好,头孢羟氨苄组54例患者中有7例、服用阿莫西林的56例患者中有6例报告有轻至中度副作用。阿莫西林组有2例出现严重恶心和呕吐,导致治疗中断。痰标本的微生物学检查显示16%有病原菌,主要是流感嗜血杆菌。阿莫西林500mg每日3次和头孢羟氨苄1g每日2次在治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期方面同样有效。

相似文献

1
A randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of cefadroxil and amoxycillin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.头孢羟氨苄与阿莫西林治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的随机、前瞻性、单盲对照研究
Br J Clin Pract. 1989 Jan;43(1):19-23.
2
Treatment of exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. A comparative double-blind study with cotrimoxazole and cefadroxil.慢性支气管炎急性加重期的治疗。一项关于复方新诺明与头孢羟氨苄的对照双盲研究。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1984;4(5):355-9.
3
Amoxycillin versus ampicillin in treatment of exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.
Br J Dis Chest. 1980 Oct;74(4):379-84.
4
Amoxycillin and co-trimoxazole in acute purulent exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.
Chemotherapy. 1977;23(1):58-64.
5
[Oral and parenteral amoxicillin in the treatment of pneumonia and acute bronchitis].[口服及胃肠外给予阿莫西林治疗肺炎和急性支气管炎]
Pharmatherapeutica. 1989;5(6):387-91.
6
Cefaclor af versus amoxycillin/clavulanate in acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a randomised multicentre study.头孢克洛与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的随机多中心研究
Int J Clin Pract. 1999 Dec;53(8):578-83.
7
[Treatment and surgery of abdominal septic states: comparison of two antibiotic therapies].
Pharmatherapeutica. 1989;5(5):355-63.
8
Evaluation of efficacy and safety of erdosteine in patients affected by chronic bronchitis during an infective exacerbation phase and receiving amoxycillin as basic treatment (ECOBES, European Chronic Obstructive Bronchitis Erdosteine Study).在感染加重期接受阿莫西林作为基础治疗的慢性支气管炎患者中评价厄多司坦的疗效和安全性(ECOBES,欧洲慢性阻塞性支气管炎厄多司坦研究)
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Nov;33(11):612-8.
9
A comparison of a five-day regimen of cefdinir with a seven-day regimen of loracarbef for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.头孢地尼五日疗法与氯碳头孢七日疗法治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的比较。
Int J Clin Pract. 2000 Jun;54(5):293-9.
10
Efficacy of fleroxacin versus amoxicillin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):131S-135S.