• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝脏血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的CT与对比增强超声表现及病理相关性比较

Comparison of CT and contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings in hepatic angiomyolipoma with pathological correlations.

作者信息

Li Rui, Tang Chun-Lin, Cai Ping, Ma Kuan-sheng, Zhang Xiao-Hang, Ding Shi-Yi, Zhang Yi, Guo De-Yu, Yan Xiao-Chu

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Southwest Hospital Affiliated to Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.

Department of Hepato-biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Southwest Hospital Affiliated to Third Military Medical University, No.30, Gaotangyan Street, Shapingba, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Feb;41(2):248-56. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0571-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-015-0571-0
PMID:26867906
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare imaging findings of CT and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) in hepatic angiomyolipoma (HAML) and investigate their pathological correlations.

METHODS

Imaging findings and preoperative diagnosis of CT and CEUS were retrospectively compared head to head in 46 patients with 54 histologically proven HAMLs. Correlations between imaging features and preoperative diagnosis with pathological types of HAMLs were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fat was detected in 100% of lipomatous type, 84.6% of mixed type, and 7.1% of myomatous type (p = 0.000) of HAML at unenhanced CT. Well-defined hyper-echogenicity was displayed in 100% of lipomatous type, 88.5% of mixed type, 50% of myomatous type, and 66.7% of angiomatous type of HAMLs at unenhanced US. More arterial hyper-enhancement was noted on CEUS (100%) than on CT (73.1%) in mixed type (p = 0.015) and in lipomatous type (90.9% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.000) of HAMLs. Washout was present in more HAMLs on CT than on CEUS (42.6% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.007). Correct preoperative diagnosis was suggested in more HAMLs of myomatous type on CEUS than on CT (42.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.016) but showed no difference in other types of HAMLs.

CONCLUSION

There are considerable discrepancies between CT and CEUS findings of HAMLs, and the imaging appearance and preoperative diagnosis of HAMLs on CT and CEUS are significantly affected by pathological types of HAMLs.

摘要

目的

比较肝脏血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(HAML)的CT和超声造影(CEUS)影像学表现,并探讨它们与病理的相关性。

方法

回顾性对比分析46例经组织学证实的54个HAML患者的CT和CEUS影像学表现及术前诊断情况。分析影像学特征及术前诊断与HAML病理类型之间的相关性。

结果

平扫CT显示脂肪瘤型HAML脂肪检出率为100%,混合型为84.6%,肌瘤型为7.1%(p = 0.000)。未增强超声显示脂肪瘤型HAML的边界清晰的高回声率为100%,混合型为88.5%,肌瘤型为50%,血管瘤型为66.7%。CEUS显示混合型(p = 0.015)和脂肪瘤型(90.9%对9.1%,p = 0.000)HAML的动脉期强化比CT更多(分别为100%和73.1%)。CT显示HAML的廓清比CEUS更多(42.6%对18.5%,p = 0.007)。CEUS对肌瘤型HAML术前正确诊断率高于CT(42.9%对0%,p = 0.016),但在其他类型HAML中无差异。

结论

HAML的CT和CEUS表现存在显著差异,且CT和CEUS上HAML的影像学表现及术前诊断受其病理类型的显著影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of CT and contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings in hepatic angiomyolipoma with pathological correlations.肝脏血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的CT与对比增强超声表现及病理相关性比较
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Feb;41(2):248-56. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0571-0.
2
The differential enhancement pattern of contrast enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics in hepatic angiomyolipoma: 7 case reports.肝脏血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的超声造影与磁共振成像特征的对比增强模式:7 例报告。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;71(1):17-26. doi: 10.3233/CH-170317.
3
Diagnosis of Hepatic Angiomyolipoma by Combination of Baseline and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound--A Prospective Study in Non-Cirrhotic Patients.通过基线超声和超声造影联合诊断肝血管平滑肌脂肪瘤——一项针对非肝硬化患者的前瞻性研究
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0132290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132290. eCollection 2015.
4
Hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma: clinical features and imaging findings of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and CT.肝上皮样血管平滑肌脂肪瘤:超声造影和CT的临床特征及影像学表现
Clin Radiol. 2017 Apr;72(4):339.e1-339.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.10.018. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
5
Hepatic angiomyolipoma: CT and MR imaging findings with clinical-pathologic comparison.肝血管平滑肌脂肪瘤:CT与MR成像表现及临床病理对照
Abdom Imaging. 2013 Jun;38(3):482-9. doi: 10.1007/s00261-012-9932-0.
6
[Sonographic and computed tomography features of hepatic angiomyolipoma].[肝脏血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的超声及计算机断层扫描特征]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2010 Oct;32(5):561-4. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2010.05.018.
7
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of hepatic angiomyolipoma: comparison with AFP-negative and non-viral hepatocellular carcinoma.肝脏血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的超声造影特征:与甲胎蛋白阴性及非病毒性肝细胞癌的比较
Ultrasound Int Open. 2024 Jun 14;10:a23186654. doi: 10.1055/a-2318-6654. eCollection 2024.
8
The Histopathological Features and CT/MRI Imaging Performances in Hepatic Angiomyolipoma Patients.肝血管平滑肌脂肪瘤患者的组织病理学特征及 CT/MRI 影像学表现。
Ann Hepatol. 2017 Sep-Oct;16(5):759-764. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.2769.
9
Hepatic angiomyolipoma: contrast patterns with SonoVue-enhanced real-time gray-scale ultrasonography.肝脏血管平滑肌脂肪瘤:声诺维增强实时灰阶超声造影模式
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(2):493-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.2.493.
10
Imaging hepatic angiomyolipomas: key features and avoiding errors.肝脏血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的影像学表现:关键特征与误诊防范。
Clin Radiol. 2020 Feb;75(2):88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.09.135. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of hepatic angiomyolipoma: comparison with AFP-negative and non-viral hepatocellular carcinoma.肝脏血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的超声造影特征:与甲胎蛋白阴性及非病毒性肝细胞癌的比较
Ultrasound Int Open. 2024 Jun 14;10:a23186654. doi: 10.1055/a-2318-6654. eCollection 2024.
2
Hepatic Angiomyolipoma Staining in the Post-vascular Phase of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Due to the Presence of Macrophages.由于巨噬细胞的存在,肝脏血管平滑肌脂肪瘤在超声造影血管后期的表现。
Intern Med. 2018 May 1;57(9):1247-1251. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9697-17. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
3
Combination of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging, serological indexes and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of liver lesions.
声辐射力脉冲成像、血清学指标与超声造影联合用于肝脏病变的诊断。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug 14;23(30):5602-5609. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i30.5602.