Just Timothy P, DeLorey Darren S
Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Physiol Rep. 2016 Feb;4(3). doi: 10.14814/phy2.12707.
Exercise training (ET) increases sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness and enhances contraction-mediated inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstriction (i.e., sympatholysis) through a nitric oxide (NO)-dependent mechanism. Changes in α2-adrenoreceptor vasoconstriction mediate a portion of these training adaptations, however the contribution of other postsynaptic receptors remains to be determined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of ET on α1-adrenoreceptor-mediated vasoconstriction in resting and contracting muscle. It was hypothesized that α1-adrenoreceptor-mediated sympatholysis would be enhanced following ET. Male Sprague Dawley rats were randomized to sedentary (S; n = 12) or heavy-intensity treadmill ET (n = 11) groups. Subsequently, rats were anesthetized and instrumented for lumbar sympathetic chain stimulation and measurement of femoral vascular conductance (FVC) at rest and during muscle contraction. The percentage change in FVC in response to sympathetic stimulation was measured in control, α1-adrenoreceptor blockade (Prazosin; 20 μg, IV), and combined α1 and NO synthase (NOS) blockade (l-NAME; 5 mg·kg(-1) IV) conditions. Sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness was increased (P < 0.05) in ET compared to S rats at low, but not high (P > 0.05) stimulation frequencies at rest (S: 2 Hz: -25 ± 4%; 5 Hz: -45 ± 5 %; ET: 2 Hz: -35 ± 7%, 5 Hz: -52 ± 7%), whereas sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness was not different (P > 0.05) between groups during contraction (S: 2 Hz: -11 ± 8%; 5 Hz: -26 ± 11%; ET: 2 Hz: -10 ± 7%, 5 Hz: -27 ± 12%). Prazosin blunted (P < 0.05) vasoconstrictor responsiveness in S and ET rats at rest and during contraction, and abolished group differences in vasoconstrictor responsiveness. Subsequent NOS blockade increased vasoconstrictor responses (P < 0.05) in S at rest and during contraction, whereas in ET vasoconstriction was increased (P < 0.05) in response to sympathetic stimulation at 2 Hz at rest and unchanged (P > 0.05) during contraction. ET enhanced (P < 0.05) sympatholysis, however the training-mediated improvements in sympatholysis were abolished by α1-adrenoreceptor blockade. Subsequent NOS inhibition did not alter (P > 0.05) sympatholysis in S or ET rats. In conclusion, ET augmented α1-adrenoreceptor-mediated vasoconstriction in resting skeletal muscle and enhanced α1-adrenoreceptor-mediated sympatholysis. Furthermore, these data suggest that NO is not required to inhibit α2-adrenoreceptor- and nonadrenoreceptor-mediated vasoconstriction during exercise.
运动训练(ET)可增强交感缩血管反应性,并通过一氧化氮(NO)依赖性机制增强收缩介导的交感缩血管抑制作用(即交感神经抑制)。α2-肾上腺素能受体血管收缩的变化介导了这些训练适应性变化的一部分,然而其他突触后受体的作用仍有待确定。因此,本研究的目的是探讨ET对静息和收缩肌肉中α1-肾上腺素能受体介导的血管收缩的影响。研究假设是ET后α1-肾上腺素能受体介导的交感神经抑制作用会增强。雄性Sprague Dawley大鼠被随机分为久坐组(S;n = 12)或高强度跑步机ET组(n = 11)。随后,大鼠被麻醉并安装仪器,用于在静息和肌肉收缩期间进行腰交感神经链刺激和股血管传导(FVC)测量。在对照、α1-肾上腺素能受体阻断(哌唑嗪;20μg,静脉注射)和α1与一氧化氮合酶(NOS)联合阻断(L-NAME;5mg·kg-1静脉注射)条件下,测量交感神经刺激引起的FVC百分比变化。与S组大鼠相比,ET组在静息时低刺激频率下交感缩血管反应性增加(P < 0.05),但高刺激频率下无增加(P > 0.05)(S组:2Hz:-25±4%;5Hz:-45±5%;ET组:2Hz:-35±7%,5Hz:-52±7%),而在收缩期间两组间交感缩血管反应性无差异(P > 0.05)(S组:2Hz:-11±8%;5Hz:-26±11%;ET组:2Hz:-10±7%,5Hz:-27±12%)。哌唑嗪使S组和ET组大鼠在静息和收缩时的缩血管反应性减弱(P < 0.05),并消除了两组间缩血管反应性的差异。随后的NOS阻断使S组在静息和收缩时的缩血管反应增加(P < 0.05),而在ET组中,静息时2Hz交感神经刺激引起的血管收缩增加(P < 0.05),收缩期间无变化(P > 0.05)。ET增强了(P < 0.05)交感神经抑制作用,然而α1-肾上腺素能受体阻断消除了训练介导的交感神经抑制改善作用。随后的NOS抑制未改变(P > 0.05)S组或ET组大鼠的交感神经抑制作用。总之,ET增强了静息骨骼肌中α1-肾上腺素能受体介导的血管收缩,并增强了α1-肾上腺素能受体介导的交感神经抑制作用。此外,这些数据表明运动期间抑制α2-肾上腺素能受体和非肾上腺素能受体介导的血管收缩不需要NO。