Nezic Dusko, Spasic Tatjana, Micovic Slobodan, Kosevic Dragana, Petrovic Ivana, Lausevic-Vuk Ljiljana, Unic-Stojanovic Dragana, Borzanovic Milorad
Departments of Cardiac Surgery.
Cardiology, "Dedinje" Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade, Serbia.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Apr;30(2):345-51. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
To compare and validate the original EuroSCORE risk stratification models with the renewed EuroSCORE II model in a contemporary cardiac surgical practice.
A consecutive observational study to validate EuroSCORE II performances, conducted as retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
A tertiary university institute for cardiovascular diseases.
Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January and December 2012.
One thousand eight hundred sixty-four consecutive patients were scored preoperatively using additive and logistic EuroSCORE as well as EuroSCORE II. The discriminative power of the EuroSCORE models was tested by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The calibration of the models was assessed by Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics and with observed-to-expected mortality ratio.
The in-hospital overall mortality was 3.65%, with predicted mortalities according to additive EuroSCORE, logistic EuroSCORE, and EuroSCORE II of 5.14%, 6.60%, and 3.51%, respectively. The observed-to-expected (O/E) mortality ratio confirmed good calibration for the entire cohort only for EuroSCORE II (1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.81 - 1.29). Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed overall good calibration only for additive EuroSCORE (p = 0.129). The EuroSCORE II confirmed very good discriminatory power for a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay of>2 days and>5 days (AUCs>0.75). Acceptable discriminatory power was confirmed for a prolonged postoperative stay of>7 days and>12 days (AUCs>0.70).
EuroSCORE II confirmed very good discriminatory capacity, good calibration ability (O/E mortality ratio), and good capability to predict prolonged ICU and postoperative stays in a contemporary patient cohort undergoing cardiac surgery.
在当代心脏外科实践中比较并验证原始欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)风险分层模型与更新后的欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)模型。
一项连续观察性研究,用于验证EuroSCORE II的性能,通过对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析开展。
一所三级大学心血管疾病研究所。
2012年1月至12月期间接受心脏手术的成年患者。
对1864例连续患者术前使用累加式和逻辑回归EuroSCORE以及EuroSCORE II进行评分。通过计算受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积来测试EuroSCORE模型的辨别力。通过Hosmer-Lemeshow统计量以及观察到的与预期的死亡率之比来评估模型的校准情况。
住院总死亡率为3.65%,根据累加式EuroSCORE、逻辑回归EuroSCORE和EuroSCORE II预测的死亡率分别为5.14%、6.60%和3.51%。仅EuroSCORE II的观察到的与预期的(O/E)死亡率之比证实整个队列校准良好(1.05,95%置信区间0.81 - 1.29)。Hosmer-Lemeshow检验仅证实累加式EuroSCORE总体校准良好(p = 0.129)。EuroSCORE II证实对于重症监护病房(ICU)停留时间延长>2天和>5天具有非常好的辨别力(AUCs>0.75)。对于术后停留时间延长>7天和>12天证实具有可接受的辨别力(AUCs>0.70)。
EuroSCORE II在当代接受心脏手术的患者队列中证实具有非常好的辨别能力、良好的校准能力(O/E死亡率之比)以及良好的预测ICU停留时间延长和术后停留时间延长的能力。