Tagu Jérôme, Doré-Mazars Karine, Lemoine-Lardennois Christelle, Vergilino-Perez Dorine
Laboratoire Vision Action Cognition, EA n°7326, Institut de Psychologie, Institut Universitaire Paris Descartes de Psychologie, Institut de Neurosciences et Cognition, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Laboratoire Vision Action Cognition, EA n°7326, Institut de Psychologie, Institut Universitaire Paris Descartes de Psychologie, Institut de Neurosciences et Cognition, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Boulogne-Billancourt, France 2Institut.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Feb;57(2):534-43. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18428.
Neuroimaging studies have shown that the dominant eye is linked preferentially to the ipsilateral primary visual cortex. However, its role in perception still is misunderstood. We examined the influence of eye dominance and eye dominance strength on saccadic parameters, contrasting stimulations presented in the two hemifields.
Participants with contrasted eye dominance (left or right) and eye dominance strength (strong or weak) were asked to make a saccade toward a target displayed at 5° or 7° left or right of a fixation cross. In some trials, a distractor at 3° of eccentricity also was displayed either in the same hemifield as the target (to induce a global effect on saccade amplitude) or in the opposite hemifield (to induce a remote distractor effect on saccade latency).
Eye dominance did influence saccade amplitude as participants with strong eye dominance showed more accurate saccades toward the target (weaker global effect) in the hemifield contralateral to the dominant eye than in the ipsilateral one. Such asymmetry was not found in participants with weak eye dominance or when a remote distractor was used.
We show that eye dominance strength influences saccade target selection. We discuss several arguments supporting the view that such advantage may be linked to the relationship between the dominant eye and ipsilateral hemisphere. French Abstract.
神经影像学研究表明,优势眼优先与同侧初级视觉皮层相连。然而,其在感知中的作用仍被误解。我们研究了眼优势和眼优势强度对扫视参数的影响,对比了在两个半视野中呈现的刺激。
具有对比性眼优势(左或右)和眼优势强度(强或弱)的参与者被要求向位于注视十字左侧或右侧5°或7°处显示的目标进行扫视。在一些试验中,还在与目标相同的半视野(以对扫视幅度产生全局影响)或相反的半视野(以对扫视潜伏期产生远距离干扰效应)中显示一个离心率为3°的干扰物。
眼优势确实影响扫视幅度,因为具有强眼优势的参与者在优势眼对侧的半视野中比在同侧半视野中对目标的扫视更准确(全局效应较弱)。在眼优势弱的参与者中或使用远距离干扰物时未发现这种不对称性。
我们表明眼优势强度影响扫视目标选择。我们讨论了几个支持这种优势可能与优势眼和同侧半球之间的关系有关的观点的论据。法语摘要。