IRIS Lab, Neurophysiology of Binocular Motor Control and Vision, CNRS FRE2022 Neurosciences, UFR Biomedical, University of Paris, 45 rue des Saints Pères, 75006, Paris, France.
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 17;10(1):22116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79089-1.
Previous studies suggest vergence and saccade abnormalities in dyslexic adolescents. However, these studies are mainly clinically based and do not provide objective measurements of eye movements, but rather subjectively evaluate vergence using haplosopic conditions in which the two eyes are dissociated (via polarizers, prisms, or intermittent spectacles). Other studies have identified deficits with binocular coordination during reading in dyslexics. Yet, there are few studies that provide objective measurements of eye movements in the dyslexic population to help provide more information regarding if these deficits could be due to an intrinsic motor problem or if they are the consequence of poor reading. 47 dyslexic adolescents (18 female, 29 male; mean age 15.5) and 44 non-dyslexic adolescents (22 female, 22 male; mean age 14.8) wore a head-based eye tracker (PupilCore, Pupil Labs, Berlin) which recorded wide angle saccade and vergence eye movements at 200 Hz. Tests were run using the REMOBI device, which produced a saccade or vergence audiovisual target. Analysis of eye movements was performed with lab-developed software, AIDEAL. The results showed statistically significant abnormalities in vergence and saccades. In vergence, dyslexics displayed a reduced amplitude of the visually driven portion of convergence and a longer duration in the initial phase of divergence. In saccades, dyslexic adolescents demonstrated slower saccades in both directions. They also had an increased disconjugate drift in the first 80 or 160 ms following saccades to the right, suggesting poor binocular coordination. For both vergence and saccades, the peak velocity and time to peak velocity was higher and earlier, respectively, in non-dyslexics compared to dyslexics; yet the average velocity of both movements was lower in dyslexics. Thus, these results indicate peculiar velocity profiles in dyslexics, particularly a slow deceleration phase in both vergence and saccades. The study provides an objective method to diagnose vergence and saccade abnormalities while viewing targets in the real three-dimensional space in a dyslexic population. Vergence abnormalities are demonstrated to be a problem in dyslexics, occurring independently from reading. We hypothesize these disconjugate drifts following saccades are the result of slow vergence capacity. Rehabilitation programs, such as those using REMOBI, should aim to target these deficits in vergence velocity, as this has been shown to improve binocular control.
先前的研究表明,阅读障碍青少年存在辐辏和扫视异常。然而,这些研究主要基于临床,并未提供眼动的客观测量,而是通过双眼分离(通过偏光镜、棱镜或间歇性眼镜)的半影条件主观评估辐辏。其他研究发现阅读障碍者在阅读过程中存在双眼协调缺陷。然而,很少有研究为阅读障碍人群提供眼动的客观测量,以提供更多信息,了解这些缺陷是否可能是由于内在运动问题引起,还是阅读不良的结果。47 名阅读障碍青少年(18 名女性,29 名男性;平均年龄 15.5 岁)和 44 名非阅读障碍青少年(22 名女性,22 名男性;平均年龄 14.8 岁)佩戴了一个基于头部的眼动追踪器(PupilCore,Pupil Labs,柏林),该追踪器以 200 Hz 的频率记录广角扫视和辐辏眼动。测试使用 REMOBI 设备进行,该设备产生扫视或辐辏视听目标。眼动分析使用实验室开发的软件 AIDEAL 进行。结果显示,辐辏和扫视存在统计学上的显著异常。在辐辏方面,阅读障碍者表现出会聚的视觉驱动部分幅度减小,发散初始阶段持续时间延长。在扫视方面,阅读障碍青少年在两个方向上的扫视速度都较慢。他们在向右扫视后的前 80 或 160 毫秒内也出现了更大的非共轭漂移,表明双眼协调能力较差。与非阅读障碍者相比,阅读障碍者的辐辏和扫视的峰值速度和达到峰值速度的时间分别更高和更早;然而,阅读障碍者的两种运动的平均速度都较低。因此,这些结果表明阅读障碍者的速度特征存在特殊性,特别是辐辏和扫视的减速阶段都较慢。该研究为在阅读障碍人群中观看真实三维空间中的目标时诊断辐辏和扫视异常提供了一种客观方法。辐辏异常被证明是阅读障碍者的一个问题,与阅读无关。我们假设这些扫视后的非共轭漂移是由于辐辏能力较慢所致。康复计划,如使用 REMOBI 的计划,应旨在针对辐辏速度的这些缺陷,因为这已被证明可以改善双眼控制。