Kraaijenga S A C, Oskam I M, van Son R J J H, Hamming-Vrieze O, Hilgers F J M, van den Brekel M W M, van der Molen L
The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 210, 1012 VT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Oral Oncol. 2016 Apr;55:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
Assessment of long-term objective and subjective voice, speech, articulation, and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for advanced, stage IV disease.
Twenty-two disease-free survivors, treated with cisplatin-based CRT for inoperable HNC (1999-2004), were evaluated at 10-years post-treatment. A standard Dutch text was recorded. Perceptual analysis of voice, speech, and articulation was conducted by two expert listeners (SLPs). Also an experimental expert system based on automatic speech recognition was used. Patients' perception of voice and speech and related quality of life was assessed with the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and Speech Handicap Index (SHI) questionnaires.
At a median follow-up of 11-years, perceptual evaluation showed abnormal scores in up to 64% of cases, depending on the outcome parameter analyzed. Automatic assessment of voice and speech parameters correlated moderate to strong with perceptual outcome scores. Patient-reported problems with voice (VHI>15) and speech (SHI>6) in daily life were present in 68% and 77% of patients, respectively. Patients treated with IMRT showed significantly less impairment compared to those treated with conventional radiotherapy.
More than 10-years after organ-preservation treatment, voice and speech problems are common in this patient cohort, as assessed with perceptual evaluation, automatic speech recognition, and with validated structured questionnaires. There were fewer complaints in patients treated with IMRT than with conventional radiotherapy.
评估接受同步放化疗(CRT)治疗晚期IV期头颈部癌(HNC)患者的长期客观和主观嗓音、言语、清晰度及生活质量。
对22例接受以顺铂为基础的CRT治疗不可切除HNC(1999 - 2004年)的无病生存者在治疗后10年进行评估。记录一段标准荷兰语文本。由两名专家听众(言语语言病理学家)对嗓音、言语和清晰度进行感知分析。还使用了基于自动语音识别的实验性专家系统。通过嗓音障碍指数(VHI)和言语障碍指数(SHI)问卷评估患者对嗓音和言语的感知以及相关生活质量。
中位随访11年时,根据所分析的结果参数,感知评估显示高达64%的病例得分异常。嗓音和言语参数的自动评估与感知结果得分呈中度至高度相关。分别有68%和77%的患者报告在日常生活中存在嗓音问题(VHI>15)和言语问题(SHI>6)。与接受传统放疗的患者相比,接受调强放疗(IMRT)的患者损伤明显更小。
在器官保留治疗10多年后,通过感知评估、自动语音识别以及经过验证的结构化问卷评估发现该患者队列中嗓音和言语问题很常见。接受IMRT治疗的患者的抱怨比接受传统放疗的患者少。