Lane Suzanne, Johnston Karissa, Sulham Katherine A, Syed Iqra, Pollack Charles V, Holland Thomas, Nathwani Dilip
ICON plc Epidemiology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
ICON plc Epidemiology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Clin Ther. 2016 Mar;38(3):531-44; quiz 544.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
Rates of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) have sharply increased since 2000. Treatment may be administered in the inpatient or outpatient setting; clinical decision-making regarding hospitalization is inconsistent, often leading to hospitalization of some patients with ABSSSI who qualify for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy, which leads to increased overall care costs. New antibiotics such as oritavancin are hypothesized to be a cost-effective option improving accessibility to ambulatory treatment of ABSSSI. The goal of this study was to understand the patient attributes that affect clinical decision-making regarding the setting of care for ABSSSI treatment.
An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted that surveyed clinicians of various specialties from the United States and the United Kingdom. The survey collected quantitative responses and used a series of choice-based experimental designs to evaluate patient attributes influencing clinical treatment decisions.
Infection severity, severe comorbidities, and age ≥ 75 years were observed to have the greatest impact on treatment location decisions (odds ratio [OR], 0.000-0.004 [95% CI, 0.000-0.011], vs mild ABSSSI; OR, 0.246-0.484 [95% CI, 0.154-0.788], vs no active comorbidities; OR, 0.136-0.523 [95% CI, 0.070-0.888], vs ≤ 18 years, respectively). The majority of respondents indicated they would consider oritavancin to avoid postdischarge outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy or oral therapy, regardless of the pathogen (63.5%-83.5%).
Key factors influencing ABSSSI treatment setting were severity of infection, severity of comorbidities, and age. Clinicians surveyed identified patient profiles in which single-dose oritavancin might enable wholly outpatient or shortened inpatient management. Additional studies to elucidate the ABSSSI care pathways that include oritavancin and other novel antibiotics are needed.
自2000年以来,急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)的发病率急剧上升。治疗可在住院或门诊环境中进行;关于住院治疗的临床决策并不一致,常常导致一些符合门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗条件的ABSSSI患者住院,这导致了总体护理成本的增加。新型抗生素如奥利万星被认为是一种具有成本效益的选择,可改善ABSSSI门诊治疗的可及性。本研究的目的是了解影响ABSSSI治疗护理环境临床决策的患者特征。
进行了一项观察性横断面研究,对来自美国和英国的各专业临床医生进行了调查。该调查收集了定量反应,并使用一系列基于选择的实验设计来评估影响临床治疗决策的患者特征。
观察到感染严重程度、严重合并症和年龄≥75岁对治疗地点决策影响最大(比值比[OR],0.000 - 0.004[95%可信区间,0.000 - 0.011],与轻度ABSSSI相比;OR,0.246 - 0.484[95%可信区间,0.154 - 0.788],与无活动性合并症相比;OR,0.136 - 0.523[95%可信区间,0.070 - 0.888],与≤18岁相比)。大多数受访者表示,无论病原体如何,他们会考虑使用奥利万星以避免出院后门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗或口服治疗(63.5% - 83.5%)。
影响ABSSSI治疗环境的关键因素是感染严重程度、合并症严重程度和年龄。接受调查的临床医生确定了单剂量奥利万星可能实现完全门诊治疗或缩短住院管理的患者概况。需要进一步开展研究以阐明包括奥利万星和其他新型抗生素在内的ABSSSI护理途径。