Margaret Roberts Jennifer, Jin Fengyi, Ekman Deborah, Kay Adams Marjorie, Lindsay McDonald Ross, Kathleen Thurloe Julia, Richards Adele, Mary Poynten Isobel, Law Carmella, Kincaid Fairley Christopher, John Hillman Richard, Tabrizi Sepehr N, Marie Cornall Alyssa, James Templeton David, Marie Garland Suzanne, Edwin Grulich Andrew, Farnsworth Annabelle
Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Sydney, Australia.
The Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Diagn Cytopathol. 2016 May;44(5):384-8. doi: 10.1002/dc.23451. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
The ThinPrep Imaging System (TIS) is an accurate time-saving method of reading cervical ThinPrep slides in screening programs. As anal and cervical cytology are morphologically similar, TIS can potentially be used for anal cytology. We assessed the performance of TIS on anal ThinPrep slides from homosexual men in a natural history study of human papillomavirus-related anal abnormalities.
Four hundred nineteen anal cytology slides were processed by TIS and classified by a cytologist as either No further review (slide archived) or Manual review (slide requiring full manual screen). The results were compared with the original manual screening report for all slides and specifically for those screening episodes accompanied by a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) on concurrent biopsy.
One hundred seventy six of 419 (42.0%) slides were classified as No further review, with a trend of decreasing proportions as the degree of severity of the cytological abnormality increased. Thirteen (27.7%) slides with an original unsatisfactory report were classified as No further review. Eighty two (92.1%) of those with biopsy HSIL and cytological abnormality were classified for Manual review, including all 45 (100%) with cytological HSIL.
The cervical algorithm of TIS performed best on anal samples when HSIL was present both cytologically and histologically. The 27.7% unsatisfactory slides classified as No further review may indicate need for use of different criteria from cervical cytology. Because of the high prevalence of abnormalities, and hence the large proportion of slides needing manual review, the cytologist time-saving would compare unfavorably with use of TIS in cervical screening.
薄层液基制片成像系统(TIS)是一种在筛查项目中读取宫颈薄层液基制片的准确且节省时间的方法。由于肛门和宫颈细胞学在形态学上相似,TIS有可能用于肛门细胞学检查。我们在一项关于人乳头瘤病毒相关肛门异常的自然史研究中,评估了TIS对男同性恋者肛门薄层液基制片的性能。
419张肛门细胞学制片由TIS处理,并由一名细胞学家分类为无需进一步检查(制片存档)或人工复查(制片需要全面人工筛查)。将结果与所有制片的原始人工筛查报告进行比较,特别是与那些在同期活检中伴有高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)的筛查病例报告进行比较。
419张制片中有176张(42.0%)被分类为无需进一步检查,随着细胞学异常严重程度的增加,这一比例有下降趋势。13张(27.7%)原始报告为不满意的制片被分类为无需进一步检查。活检为HSIL且有细胞学异常的病例中,82例(92.1%)被分类为需要人工复查,包括所有45例(100%)细胞学为HSIL的病例。
当细胞学和组织学上均存在HSIL时,TIS的宫颈算法在肛门样本上表现最佳。27.7%被分类为无需进一步检查的不满意制片可能表明需要使用与宫颈细胞学不同的标准。由于异常患病率高,因此需要人工复查的制片比例大,与在宫颈筛查中使用TIS相比,节省细胞学家的时间效果不佳。