• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于估计具有连续处理的广义倾向得分的提升算法。

A Boosting Algorithm for Estimating Generalized Propensity Scores with Continuous Treatments.

作者信息

Zhu Yeying, Coffman Donna L, Ghosh Debashis

机构信息

Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.

The Methodology Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Causal Inference. 2015 Mar 1;3(1):25-40. doi: 10.1515/jci-2014-0022. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1515/jci-2014-0022
PMID:26877909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4749263/
Abstract

In this article, we study the causal inference problem with a continuous treatment variable using propensity score-based methods. For a continuous treatment, the generalized propensity score is defined as the conditional density of the treatment-level given covariates (confounders). The dose-response function is then estimated by inverse probability weighting, where the weights are calculated from the estimated propensity scores. When the dimension of the covariates is large, the traditional nonparametric density estimation suffers from the curse of dimensionality. Some researchers have suggested a two-step estimation procedure by first modeling the mean function. In this study, we suggest a boosting algorithm to estimate the mean function of the treatment given covariates. In boosting, an important tuning parameter is the number of trees to be generated, which essentially determines the trade-off between bias and variance of the causal estimator. We propose a criterion called average absolute correlation coefficient (AACC) to determine the optimal number of trees. Simulation results show that the proposed approach performs better than a simple linear approximation or L2 boosting. The proposed methodology is also illustrated through the Early Dieting in Girls study, which examines the influence of mothers' overall weight concern on daughters' dieting behavior.

摘要

在本文中,我们使用基于倾向得分的方法研究具有连续处理变量的因果推断问题。对于连续处理,广义倾向得分被定义为给定协变量(混杂因素)时处理水平的条件密度。然后通过逆概率加权估计剂量反应函数,其中权重是根据估计的倾向得分计算得出的。当协变量的维度很大时,传统的非参数密度估计会受到维度诅咒的影响。一些研究人员提出了一种两步估计程序,首先对均值函数进行建模。在本研究中,我们提出一种提升算法来估计给定协变量时处理的均值函数。在提升算法中,一个重要的调优参数是要生成的树的数量,它本质上决定了因果估计量偏差和方差之间的权衡。我们提出一种称为平均绝对相关系数(AACC)的准则来确定最优树的数量。模拟结果表明,所提出的方法比简单线性近似或L2提升表现更好。还通过女孩早期节食研究对所提出的方法进行了说明,该研究考察了母亲对总体体重的关注对女儿节食行为的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cf/4749263/6028d6d1b7fa/nihms725897f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cf/4749263/f950df97b7e4/nihms725897f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cf/4749263/e3fd04460570/nihms725897f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cf/4749263/671080924e63/nihms725897f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cf/4749263/b00b415c40c7/nihms725897f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cf/4749263/6028d6d1b7fa/nihms725897f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cf/4749263/f950df97b7e4/nihms725897f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cf/4749263/e3fd04460570/nihms725897f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cf/4749263/671080924e63/nihms725897f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cf/4749263/b00b415c40c7/nihms725897f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cf/4749263/6028d6d1b7fa/nihms725897f5.jpg

相似文献

1
A Boosting Algorithm for Estimating Generalized Propensity Scores with Continuous Treatments.一种用于估计具有连续处理的广义倾向得分的提升算法。
J Causal Inference. 2015 Mar 1;3(1):25-40. doi: 10.1515/jci-2014-0022. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
2
Using Propensity Score Methods To Assess Causal Effects of Mothers' Dieting Behavior on Daughters' Early Dieting Behavior.使用倾向得分法评估母亲节食行为对女儿早期节食行为的因果效应。
Child Obes. 2016 Oct;12(5):334-40. doi: 10.1089/chi.2015.0249. Epub 2016 May 5.
3
Optimizing Variance-Bias Trade-off in the TWANG Package for Estimation of Propensity Scores.优化TWANG软件包中用于倾向得分估计的方差-偏差权衡
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2017 Dec;17(3-4):175-197. doi: 10.1007/s10742-016-0168-2. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
4
Targeted estimation of nuisance parameters to obtain valid statistical inference.对干扰参数进行有针对性的估计以获得有效的统计推断。
Int J Biostat. 2014;10(1):29-57. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2012-0038.
5
A Kernel-Based Metric for Balance Assessment.一种基于核的平衡评估指标。
J Causal Inference. 2018 Sep;6(2). doi: 10.1515/jci-2016-0029. Epub 2018 May 18.
6
Propensity scores based methods for estimating average treatment effect and average treatment effect among treated: A comparative study.基于倾向得分法估计平均治疗效果及治疗组中的平均治疗效果:一项比较研究。
Biom J. 2017 Sep;59(5):967-985. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600094. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
7
Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores in Estimating Counterfactual Survival Functions via the Overlap Weights.通过重叠权重解决极端倾向评分对反事实生存函数估计的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 May 20;191(6):1140-1151. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac043.
8
Two-step estimation in ratio-of-mediator-probability weighted causal mediation analysis.两阶段估计在中介概率比加权因果中介分析中的应用。
Stat Med. 2018 Apr 15;37(8):1304-1324. doi: 10.1002/sim.7581. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
9
Estimating generalized propensity scores with survey and attrition weighted data.利用调查和流失加权数据估计广义倾向得分。
Stat Med. 2024 May 20;43(11):2183-2202. doi: 10.1002/sim.10039. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
10
Propensity score analysis with local balance.倾向评分分析与局部平衡。
Stat Med. 2023 Jul 10;42(15):2637-2660. doi: 10.1002/sim.9741. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Lipid metabolism-related inflammatory indices (LMIIs) and incident peripheral artery diseases (PAD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): a multicohort study from China and the UK biobank.2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的脂质代谢相关炎症指标(LMIIs)与外周动脉疾病(PAD)的发生:一项来自中国和英国生物银行的多队列研究
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Aug 22;24(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02887-2.
2
A Simple Diagnostic for the Positivity Assumption for Continuous Exposures.一种针对连续暴露阳性假设的简单诊断方法。
Stat Med. 2025 Jul;44(15-17):e70194. doi: 10.1002/sim.70194.
3
Weighted Euclidean balancing for a matrix exposure in estimating causal effect.

本文引用的文献

1
A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models.使用广义提升模型进行多种处理的倾向评分估计教程。
Stat Med. 2013 Aug 30;32(19):3388-414. doi: 10.1002/sim.5753. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
2
An information criterion for marginal structural models.边缘结构模型的信息准则。
Stat Med. 2013 Apr 15;32(8):1383-93. doi: 10.1002/sim.5599. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
3
Dieting and unhealthy weight control behaviors during adolescence: associations with 10-year changes in body mass index.青少年时期的节食和不健康的体重控制行为:与 10 年内体重指数变化的关联。
用于估计因果效应的矩阵暴露的加权欧几里得平衡法。
Int J Biostat. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2024-0021.
4
Impact of young adult life transitions on adult mental health problems: a propensity score analysis.青年期生活转变对成人心理健康问题的影响:一项倾向得分分析。
Psychol Med. 2025 May 19;55:e152. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725001072.
5
Causal Effect of Count Treatment on Ordinal Outcome Using Generalized Propensity Score: Application to Number of Antenatal Care and Age Specific Childhood Vaccination.使用广义倾向得分分析计数治疗对有序结局的因果效应:在产前检查次数和特定年龄儿童疫苗接种中的应用
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2025 Feb 12;15(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s44197-025-00344-7.
6
Antibiotics versus Non-Antibiotic in the treatment of Aspiration Pneumonia: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.抗生素与非抗生素治疗吸入性肺炎的对比:MIMIC-IV数据库分析
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03441-8.
7
Childhood PM exposure and upward mobility in the United States.儿童时期 PM 暴露与美国的向上流动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 17;121(38):e2401882121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401882121. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
8
An introduction to inverse probability weighting and marginal structural models: The case of environmental tobacco exposure and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder behaviors.逆概率加权法与边际结构模型介绍:以环境烟草暴露与注意力缺陷多动障碍行为为例
Dev Psychol. 2024 Aug 22. doi: 10.1037/dev0001803.
9
Comparing traditional and causal inference methodologies for evaluating impacts of long-term air pollution exposure on hospitalization with Alzheimer disease and related dementias.比较传统方法和因果推断方法,以评估长期空气污染暴露对阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症住院治疗的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 8;194(1):64-72. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae133.
10
Residential greenness and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a large cohort in southern China: Potential causal links, risk trajectories, and mediation pathways.中国南方一个大型队列中的居住绿地与慢性阻塞性肺疾病:潜在因果联系、风险轨迹及中介途径
J Adv Res. 2025 May;71:355-367. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2024.05.025. Epub 2024 May 24.
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Jan;50(1):80-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
4
Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research.倾向评分技术与测量协变量平衡评估在心理研究中测试因果关系。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Sep;15(3):234-49. doi: 10.1037/a0019623.
5
On Brownian Distance Covariance and High Dimensional Data.关于布朗距离协方差与高维数据
Ann Appl Stat. 2009 Jan 1;3(4):1266-1269. doi: 10.1214/09-AOAS312.
6
Average causal effects from nonrandomized studies: a practical guide and simulated example.非随机研究的平均因果效应:实用指南与模拟示例。
Psychol Methods. 2008 Dec;13(4):279-313. doi: 10.1037/a0014268.
7
Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.评论:揭开双重稳健性的神秘面纱:从不完整数据估计总体均值的替代策略比较。
Stat Sci. 2007;22(4):569-573. doi: 10.1214/07-STS227.
8
Model selection for incomplete and design-based samples.不完全样本和基于设计的样本的模型选择
Stat Med. 2006 Jul 30;25(14):2502-20. doi: 10.1002/sim.2559.
9
On the use of discrete choice models for causal inference.关于离散选择模型在因果推断中的应用。
Stat Med. 2005 Jul 30;24(14):2197-2212. doi: 10.1002/sim.2095.
10
Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies.使用增强回归进行倾向评分估计以评估观察性研究中的因果效应。
Psychol Methods. 2004 Dec;9(4):403-25. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.403.