• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的一年经验:未使用反向三角测量法。

One-year experience with single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a single center: without the use of inverse triangulation.

作者信息

Ryu Yun Beom, Lee Jung Woo, Park Yo Han, Lim Man Sup, Cho Ji Woong, Jeon Jang Yong

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Feb;90(2):72-8. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.90.2.72. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

DOI:10.4174/astr.2016.90.2.72
PMID:26878014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4751148/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is generally performed with the use of inverse triangulation. In this study, we performed 3-channel or 4-channel SILC without the use of inverse triangulation. We evaluated the adequacy and feasibility of SILC using our surgical method.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our series of 309 SILCs performed between March 2014 and February 2015.

RESULTS

Among 309 SILCs, male were 148 and female were 161 patients, mean age was 48.7 ± 15.3 years old and mean body mass index was 24.8 ± 3.8 kg/m(2). Forty patients had previously undergone abdominal surgery including 6 cases of upper abdominal surgery. SILC after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder (GB) drainage was completed in 8.7% of cases. There were 10 cases of emergency SILC. SILC was performed for noncomplicated GB including symptomatic GB stone and polyp in 66.7% of cases, acute cholecystitis in 33.3%. Overall, 96.8% of procedures were successfully completed without additional port. The reason for addition of an extra port or open conversion included technical difficulties due to severe adhesion and bleeding. The mean operating time was 60.7 ± 22.3 minutes. The overall complication rate was 4.8%: 9 patients of wound seroma, 1 case of bile leakage from GB bed, 4 cases of intra-abdominal abscess or fluid collection, and 1 case of incisional hernia were developed. There was no case of common bile duct injury.

CONCLUSION

Our surgical method of SILC without the use of inverse triangulation is safe, feasible and effective technique.

摘要

目的

单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)通常采用反向三角定位法进行。在本研究中,我们在不使用反向三角定位法的情况下进行了三通道或四通道SILC。我们评估了使用我们的手术方法进行SILC的充分性和可行性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2014年3月至2015年2月期间进行的309例SILC病例。

结果

在309例SILC中,男性148例,女性161例,平均年龄为48.7±15.3岁,平均体重指数为24.8±3.8kg/m²。40例患者既往接受过腹部手术,其中6例为上腹部手术。8.7%的病例在经皮经肝胆囊引流术后完成了SILC。有10例急诊SILC。66.7%的病例为非复杂性胆囊疾病,包括有症状的胆囊结石和息肉,33.3%为急性胆囊炎。总体而言,96.8%的手术在未增加额外端口的情况下成功完成。增加额外端口或转为开放手术的原因包括严重粘连和出血导致的技术困难。平均手术时间为60.7±22.3分钟。总体并发症发生率为4.8%:9例伤口血清肿,1例胆囊床胆汁漏,4例腹腔内脓肿或积液,1例切口疝。无胆总管损伤病例。

结论

我们不使用反向三角定位法的SILC手术方法是一种安全、可行且有效的技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac32/4751148/a09a9ef49cb9/astr-90-72-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac32/4751148/0e90f647a301/astr-90-72-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac32/4751148/d668f8950953/astr-90-72-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac32/4751148/a09a9ef49cb9/astr-90-72-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac32/4751148/0e90f647a301/astr-90-72-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac32/4751148/d668f8950953/astr-90-72-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac32/4751148/a09a9ef49cb9/astr-90-72-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
One-year experience with single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a single center: without the use of inverse triangulation.单中心单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的一年经验:未使用反向三角测量法。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Feb;90(2):72-8. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.90.2.72. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
2
Four-channel single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a snake retractor: comparison between 3- and 4-channel SILC 4-channel single incision cholecystectomy.使用蛇形牵开器的四通道单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:三通道与四通道单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较 四通道单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 Aug;87(2):81-6. doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.87.2.81. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
3
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using Konyang Standard Method.采用光阳标准方法的单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 Apr;86(4):177-83. doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.86.4.177. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
4
Comparison of outcomes of single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis requiring percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage.对于需要经皮经肝胆管胆囊引流术的胆囊炎患者,单切口与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疗效比较。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Oct;13(4):477-480. doi: 10.1111/ases.12774. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
5
A large-cohort comparison between single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a single center; 2080 cases.单中心2080例单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的大样本队列比较
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018 Nov;22(4):367-373. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.4.367. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
6
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: will it succeed as the future leading technique for gallbladder removal?单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:它会成为未来胆囊切除的主导技术并取得成功吗?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Dec;24(6):e207-10. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31829ce9c0.
7
Comparison of outcomes of single incision robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔机器人胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疗效比较。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2021 Feb 28;25(1):78-83. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.78.
8
Safety and feasibility of needlescopic grasper-assisted single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: comparison with three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.针状内镜抓钳辅助单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎患者的安全性和可行性:与三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Aug;24(8):523-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0552. Epub 2014 May 12.
9
Evolution of the Konyang Standard Method for single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the result from a thousand case of a single center experience.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的昆阳标准方法的演变:来自单中心一千例病例的经验结果。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Aug;95(2):80-86. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.95.2.80. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
10
Risk factors for conversion to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转为传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的危险因素。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Jun;90(6):303-8. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.90.6.303. Epub 2016 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical risk calculator development for postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter prospective cohort study.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后手术风险计算器对术后结局的预测:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Jun;108(6):352-361. doi: 10.4174/astr.2025.108.6.352. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
2
Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review.腹腔镜手术和机器人手术用于单孔胆囊切除术:一项更新的系统评价。
Updates Surg. 2021 Dec;73(6):2039-2046. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01056-w. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
3
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using instrumental alignment in robotic single-site cholecystectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Is routine single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy feasible? A retrospective observational study.
Am J Surg. 2015 Aug;210(2):315-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.032. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
2
Do height and weight affect the feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy?身高和体重会影响单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性吗?
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3594-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4115-z. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
3
How to do single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using LEAN BACK technique.
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Apr;85(4):284-5. doi: 10.1111/ans.12943. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
4
在机器人单孔胆囊切除术中利用器械对齐进行单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Jun;94(6):291-297. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.94.6.291. Epub 2018 May 29.
Expanding the indications for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy to all patients with biliary disease: is it safe?将单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的适应症扩大至所有胆道疾病患者:这安全吗?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Feb;25(1):10-14. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000095.
5
Four-channel single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a snake retractor: comparison between 3- and 4-channel SILC 4-channel single incision cholecystectomy.使用蛇形牵开器的四通道单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:三通道与四通道单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较 四通道单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 Aug;87(2):81-6. doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.87.2.81. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
6
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using Konyang Standard Method.采用光阳标准方法的单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 Apr;86(4):177-83. doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.86.4.177. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
7
SILC for SILC: Single Institution Learning Curve for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的单机构学习曲线:单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的单机构学习曲线
Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:381628. doi: 10.1155/2013/381628. Epub 2013 May 9.
8
Teaching single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric patients.在儿科患者中教授单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术。
JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):619-22. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882737339.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.系统评价和随机临床试验的荟萃分析比较单切口与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Br J Surg. 2013 Jan;100(2):191-208. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8937. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
10
Controversies in single-port laparoscopic surgery.单孔腹腔镜手术中的争议
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Oct;22(5):380-2. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182615776.