• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高外科医生的风险认知能力。

Improving risk literacy in surgeons.

作者信息

Garcia-Retamero Rocio, Cokely Edward T, Wicki Barbara, Joeris Alexander

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Spain; Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany; National Institute for Risk & Resilience, and Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jul;99(7):1156-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.013
PMID:26879804
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To effectively practice evidence-based medicine, surgeons need to understand and be able to communicate health-relevant numerical information. We present the first study examining risk literacy in surgeons by assessing numeracy and surgical risk comprehension. Our study also investigated whether visual aids improve risk comprehension in surgeons with limited numeracy.

METHODS

Participants were 292 surgeons from 60 countries who completed an instrument measuring numeracy and evaluated the results of a randomized controlled trial including post-surgical side-effects. Half of the surgeons received this information in numbers. The other half received the information represented visually. Accuracy of risk estimation, reading latency, and estimate latency (i.e., deliberation) were assessed.

RESULTS

Some surgeons have low numeracy and could not correctly interpret surgical risks without additional support. Visual aids made risks transparent and eliminated differences in risk understanding between more and less numerate surgeons, increasing the amount of time that less numerate surgeons spent deliberating about risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual aids can be an efficient and inexpensive means of improving risk comprehension and clinical judgement in surgeons with low numerical and statistical skills.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Programs designed to help professionals represent and communicate health-relevant numerical information in simple transparent graphs may unobtrusively promote informed decision making.

摘要

目的

为了有效地践行循证医学,外科医生需要理解并能够交流与健康相关的数值信息。我们开展了第一项通过评估算术能力和手术风险理解来研究外科医生风险素养的研究。我们的研究还调查了视觉辅助工具是否能提高算术能力有限的外科医生的风险理解。

方法

参与者为来自60个国家的292名外科医生,他们完成了一项测量算术能力的工具,并评估了一项包括术后副作用的随机对照试验的结果。一半的外科医生以数字形式接收此信息。另一半以视觉形式接收信息。评估了风险估计的准确性、阅读潜伏期和估计潜伏期(即思考时间)。

结果

一些外科医生算术能力较低,在没有额外支持的情况下无法正确解读手术风险。视觉辅助工具使风险变得清晰易懂,消除了算术能力较强和较弱的外科医生在风险理解上的差异,增加了算术能力较弱的外科医生思考风险的时间。

结论

视觉辅助工具可以成为提高算术和统计技能较低的外科医生风险理解和临床判断的一种高效且经济的手段。

实践意义

旨在帮助专业人员以简单易懂的图表呈现和交流与健康相关数值信息的项目,可能会在不引人注意的情况下促进明智的决策。

相似文献

1
Improving risk literacy in surgeons.提高外科医生的风险认知能力。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jul;99(7):1156-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
2
Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.告知患者:计算能力、框架和副作用信息呈现格式对风险认知的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2011 May-Jun;31(3):432-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10391672. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
3
Communicating global cardiovascular risk: are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk?传达全球心血管风险:在提高对风险的理解、记忆和认知方面,图标阵列是否优于数值估计?
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):394-402. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.026. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
4
Who profits from visual aids: overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks [corrected].谁从视觉辅助中受益:克服人们对风险理解的挑战 [已更正]。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(7):1019-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.031. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
5
Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools.图表素养在以患者为中心的沟通工具开发中的相关性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Mar;99(3):448-454. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
6
Health literacy, numeracy, and interpretation of graphical breast cancer risk estimates.健康素养、计算能力与图形化乳腺癌风险估计的解读。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Apr;83(1):92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.027.
7
Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics.设计促进风险素养的视觉辅助工具:健康研究与循证设计启发法的系统综述
Hum Factors. 2017 Jun;59(4):582-627. doi: 10.1177/0018720817690634. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
8
Correlating reading comprehension and health numeracy among adults with low literacy.研究低文化程度成年人的阅读理解和健康算数能力的相关性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jul;84(1):132-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.030. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
9
Empirical relationships between numeracy and treatment decision making: A scoping review of the literature.算术能力与治疗决策之间的实证关系:文献综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Mar;99(3):310-325. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
10
Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial.动画是否能提高低健康素养患者对风险信息的理解?一项随机试验。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):17-28. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19890296. Epub 2019 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of risk literacy, decision-making styles and motivation on clinical reasoning in medical students: an ordinal logistic regression analysis.风险认知、决策风格和动机对医学生临床推理的影响:一项有序逻辑回归分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07135-5.
2
Teaching Medical Students to Communicate Risks Like Military Intelligence Analysts.教医学生像军事情报分析师一样传达风险。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Sep 27;11:23821205241278182. doi: 10.1177/23821205241278182. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Healthcare worker attitudes on routine non-urological preoperative urine cultures: a qualitative assessment.
医护人员对常规非泌尿外科术前尿培养的态度:一项定性评估。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 19;45(10):1-6. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.85.
4
Assessing Risk Literacy Skills: Enhancing Healthcare Management among University Students.评估风险素养技能:提升大学生的医疗保健管理水平。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 23;12(11):1061. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12111061.
5
General practitioners' risk literacy and real-world prescribing of potentially hazardous drugs: a cross-sectional study.全科医生的风险素养与潜在危害药物的实际处方:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Sep 19;33(10):634-641. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016979.
6
Healthcare providers' understanding of data displays of clinical trial information: a scoping review of the literature.医疗保健提供者对临床试验信息数据展示的理解:文献的范围综述。
J Commun Healthc. 2023 Oct;16(3):260-267. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2022.2150236. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
7
How Do People Process Different Representations of Statistical Information? Insights into Cognitive Effort, Representational Inconsistencies, and Individual Differences.人们如何处理不同形式的统计信息?对认知努力、表示不一致和个体差异的洞察。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Oct-Nov;43(7-8):803-820. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231202505. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
8
Examining Care Planning Efficiency and Clinical Decision Support Adoption in a System Tailoring to Nurses' Graph Literacy: National, Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.考察在专为护士图形读写能力定制的系统中,护理计划效率和临床决策支持采用情况:全国性、基于网络的随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 11;25:e45043. doi: 10.2196/45043.
9
Complexity of Data Displays in Prescription Drug Advertisements for Healthcare Providers.处方药广告中数据展示的复杂性:面向医疗保健提供者。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):712-716. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00523-3. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
10
Clinician Attitudes and Beliefs Associated with More Aggressive Diagnostic Testing.临床医生的态度和信念与更积极的诊断检测有关。
Am J Med. 2022 Jul;135(7):e182-e193. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.02.036. Epub 2022 Mar 18.