Alschuler Kevin N, Kratz Anna L, Ehde Dawn M
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine.
Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Medical School.
Rehabil Psychol. 2016 Feb;61(1):7-18. doi: 10.1037/rep0000055.
To examine the independent contributions of vulnerability and resilience factors to pain interference, self-efficacy for managing pain, global mental health, and global physical health.
RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Secondary analysis of baseline data from individuals with a spinal cord injury (n = 73), amputation (n = 33), or multiple sclerosis (n = 82) and chronic pain who participated in a randomized controlled trial comparing 2 chronic pain interventions. Participants completed a comprehensive battery of pain-related outcomes that assessed for both psychosocial assets and maladaptive cognitions and behaviors.
Results suggested that vulnerability and resilience factors together account for a considerable amount of variance in the physical outcomes, but that neither set of factors was able to make a substantial contribution above and beyond the other. In contrast, for mental health related outcomes, results indicated that resilience factors did make a meaningful contribution above and beyond vulnerability factors, suggesting the important contribution of resilience factors to the psychological experience of chronic pain.
The present study suggested a valuable contribution of both resilience and vulnerability factors to pain outcomes, with the additional caveat that resilience factors uniquely impact specific outcomes-particularly those that are more psychosocially focused-above and beyond vulnerability factors. Taken together, this highlights the importance of considering resilience factors in addition to vulnerability factors for individuals with chronic pain. Additional research is needed to explore other factors that could be considered representative of the resilience construct and more attention should be focused on evaluating the effects of interventions that seek to build an individual's assets.
探讨易损性因素和复原力因素对疼痛干扰、疼痛管理自我效能、整体心理健康和整体身体健康的独立影响。
研究方法/设计:对脊髓损伤(n = 73)、截肢(n = 33)或多发性硬化症(n = 82)且患有慢性疼痛并参与比较两种慢性疼痛干预措施的随机对照试验的个体的基线数据进行二次分析。参与者完成了一系列全面的疼痛相关结局评估,包括心理社会资产以及适应不良的认知和行为。
结果表明,易损性因素和复原力因素共同解释了身体结局中相当大比例的变异,但两组因素均无法在对方基础上做出实质性额外贡献。相比之下,对于心理健康相关结局,结果表明复原力因素确实在易损性因素之外做出了有意义的贡献,这表明复原力因素对慢性疼痛心理体验具有重要作用。
本研究表明复原力因素和易损性因素对疼痛结局均有重要贡献,此外复原力因素在易损性因素之外对特定结局(尤其是那些更侧重于心理社会方面的结局)具有独特影响。综上所述,这凸显了对于慢性疼痛患者除考虑易损性因素外还需考虑复原力因素的重要性。需要进一步研究探索其他可被视为复原力结构代表的因素,并且应更加关注评估旨在增强个体资产的干预措施的效果。