School of Psychology and Centre for Pain Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
J Pain. 2013 Mar;14(3):233-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.11.004.
An 8-item version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8) has recently been proposed and validated. The aims of this study were to further investigate the reliability and validity of the CPAQ-8 in a new sample. Questionnaires were completed by 550 people with chronic pain (478 online survey, 72 paper survey). A demographic and pain history questionnaire was administered along with the CPAQ-8 and measures of pain self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, psychological flexibility in pain, anxiety, and mood. In addition, 105 respondents completed the CPAQ-8 within 6 weeks to provide test-retest reliability data. The 2-factor structure of the CPAQ-8 (Activity Engagement [AE] and Pain Willingness [PW]) was confirmed and had reasonable-to-good scale score reliability and test-retest reliability. Pain acceptance as measured by the CPAQ-8 was associated with less depression, anxiety, pain interference, fear of reinjury, pain catastrophizing, and psychological inflexibility in pain, and higher levels of satisfaction with life, pain self-efficacy, and general acceptance. Furthermore, pain acceptance fully mediated the relationship between reported pain severity and emotional distress (anxiety and depression) and partially mediated the relationship between pain severity and pain interference in a structural equation model. The test-retest reliability after 4 to 6 weeks ranged from .68 for PW to .86 for AE; the overall score correlation was .81. We conclude that the CPAQ-8 is a reliable and valid measure of pain acceptance and that the 2 subscales of the measure each make an individual contribution to the prediction of adjustment in people with chronic pain.
The present study provides further evidence for the reliability and validity of the CPAQ-8. Support was found for the 2 related subscales, PW and AE, which appear to work in synergy to influence levels of pain interference and emotional distress in people living with chronic pain.
最近提出并验证了慢性疼痛接受问卷(CPAQ-8)的 8 项版本。本研究的目的是在新样本中进一步研究 CPAQ-8 的可靠性和有效性。共有 550 名慢性疼痛患者(478 名在线调查,72 名纸质调查)完成了问卷调查。除了 CPAQ-8 外,还进行了人口统计学和疼痛史问卷以及疼痛自我效能感、疼痛灾难化、疼痛心理灵活性、焦虑和情绪的测量。此外,105 名受访者在 6 周内完成了 CPAQ-8,以提供测试-重测信度数据。CPAQ-8 的 2 因素结构(活动参与度 [AE]和疼痛意愿度 [PW])得到了确认,量表得分具有合理到良好的可靠性和测试-重测信度。CPAQ-8 测量的疼痛接受度与抑郁、焦虑、疼痛干扰、害怕再受伤、疼痛灾难化和疼痛心理灵活性降低,生活满意度、疼痛自我效能感和一般接受度提高有关。此外,在结构方程模型中,疼痛接受度完全中介了报告的疼痛严重程度与情绪困扰(焦虑和抑郁)之间的关系,部分中介了疼痛严重程度与疼痛干扰之间的关系。4 至 6 周后的测试-重测信度范围从 PW 的.68 到 AE 的.86;总分相关性为.81。我们得出结论,CPAQ-8 是一种可靠且有效的疼痛接受度测量工具,并且该测量的 2 个分量表各自对慢性疼痛患者的适应情况做出了独立的贡献。
本研究进一步证明了 CPAQ-8 的可靠性和有效性。CPAQ-8 的两个相关分量表 PW 和 AE 得到了支持,它们似乎协同工作,影响慢性疼痛患者的疼痛干扰和情绪困扰水平。